IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v40y2022i4p546-558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Support or evaluate? The multifaceted role of supervisors during the newcomer socialization process

Author

Listed:
  • Dufour, Lucas
  • Andiappan, Meena
  • Banoun, Arnaud

Abstract

This study develops theory related to how the socialization process occurs from the supervisor's perspective. Using interview data from 102 supervisors, we find that most supervisors simultaneously evaluate (using monitor behaviors) and promote (using inform and support behaviors) newcomers' fits. Supervisors do so by switching their focus three times: first, from general employability to person–group fit; second, from person–group fit to person–job fit; and third, from person–job fit to person–organization fit. We observed variations in the order in which supervisors evaluated and promoted newcomers' types of fits. However, we found that supervisors evaluated and promoted newcomers' fits consistently following the same order in terms of fit paradigms: first adopting a demands–abilities fit paradigm, then a needs–supplies fit paradigm, and finally a value congruence fit paradigm. We contribute to the socialization and fit literatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Dufour, Lucas & Andiappan, Meena & Banoun, Arnaud, 2022. "Support or evaluate? The multifaceted role of supervisors during the newcomer socialization process," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 546-558.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:40:y:2022:i:4:p:546-558
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2021.08.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237321001158
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2021.08.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:40:y:2022:i:4:p:546-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.