IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v27y2009i6p388-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain contract evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Coltman, Tim
  • Bru, Kathrine
  • Perm-Ajchariyawong, Nidthida
  • Devinney, Timothy M.
  • Benito, Gabriel R.G.

Abstract

Summary This paper draws together theories from organisational and neo-institutional literatures to address the evolution of supply chain contracts. Using a longitudinal case study of the Norwegian State Railways, we examine how firms move through the stages in an inter-organisational process of supply chain contract evolution and how they can cooperate to ensure efficiency and equity in their contractual relationship. The findings suggest that inefficient and inequitable initial contracts can occur, in part, because of the cognitive shortcomings in human decision-making processes that reveal themselves early in the arrangement before learning and trust building can accumulate. We then reveal how parties can renegotiate towards a more equitable and efficient supply chain contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Coltman, Tim & Bru, Kathrine & Perm-Ajchariyawong, Nidthida & Devinney, Timothy M. & Benito, Gabriel R.G., 2009. "Supply chain contract evolution," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 388-401, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:27:y:2009:i:6:p:388-401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237308001333
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Papathanasiou, Angeliki & Cole, Rosanna & Murray, Philip, 2020. "The (non-)application of blockchain technology in the Greek shipping industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 927-938.
    2. Lennart Hammerström & Giebe Carsten, 2022. "Taxonomy of an Liot Device Based upon Production Functions," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, ejes_v8_i.
    3. Börjeson, Love, 2015. "Interorganizational situations – An explorative typology," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 191-200.
    4. Alicia Rodríguez & María Jesús Nieto, 2016. "Does R&D offshoring lead to SME growth? Different governance modes and the mediating role of innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1734-1753, August.
    5. Sung Wook Yoon & Suk Jae Jeong, 2016. "Implementing Coordinative Contracts between Manufacturer and Retailer in a Reverse Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Ivana Kovacevic & Biljana Panic & Mirko Vujosevic & Marija Kuzmanovic, 2013. "Application of Transactional Analysis in Bullwhip Effect Analysis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(33), pages 210-223, February.
    7. repec:eur:ejfejr:78 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Martinez-Noya, Andrea & Garcia-Canal, Esteban & Guillen, Mauro F., 2012. "International R&D service outsourcing by technology-intensive firms: Whether and where?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 18-37.
    9. Liu, Yi & Zhang, Hengyuan & Chen, Daniel Q., 2024. "On the economic implications of international travel restrictions: Evidence from Chinese MNEs’ firm value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Tamas Faludi, 2020. "Characteristics Of The Green Supply Chain Coordination: Theoretical Contribution To Use The Wholesale Pricing Contract In The Green Supply Chain," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(special), pages 135-143, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:27:y:2009:i:6:p:388-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.