IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v23y2005i5p542-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in Listed Danish Firms:: In Search of the Missing Link

Author

Listed:
  • Rose, Caspar

Abstract

Conventional wisdom argues that managerial ownership may alleviate agency costs due to the separation of ownership and control. The reason is that a higher ownership stake by insiders may help to align the interests of management and shareholders, since management, to a larger extent, becomes a residual claimant. The existing evidence very often relies on data where dispersed ownership combined with a common law tradition are key institutional ingredients. However, it does not provide clear support for the hypothesis that increased managerial ownership improves firm performance. This study contributes to the search for the missing link using a sample in which the institutional framework differs from the Anglo-American system. Specifically, the article conducts a cross-sectional regression analysis of a sample of listed Danish firms testing whether increased managerial ownership is associated with superior firm financial performance measured by Tobin's q. The results reveal that the hypothesis must be rejected. Instead, using three stage least squares analysis shows that increased firm performance results in a higher managerial ownership stake.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose, Caspar, 2005. "Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in Listed Danish Firms:: In Search of the Missing Link," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 542-553, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:23:y:2005:i:5:p:542-553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237305000988
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdullah Ajlouni & Francisco Bastida & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2024. "Corporate Governance and Employee Productivity: Evidence from Jordan," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Oleksandr Talavera & Charlie Weir & Lin Xiong, 2017. "Time Allocation and Performance: The Case of Chinese Entrepreneurs," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 27-51, January.
    3. Afzalur Rashid, 2015. "Revisiting Agency Theory: Evidence of Board Independence and Agency Cost from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 181-198, August.
    4. Mohammed Arkan Sahib Tileal & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Mohammad Javad Saei & Davood Askarany, 2023. "The Impact of Ownership Type on Labour Cost Stickiness," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Elena Merino & Montserrat Manzaneque & Yolanda Ramírez, 2019. "Value-added distribution to stakeholder of Spanish listed companies: a corporate governance perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 577-604, September.
    6. Manzaneque, Montserrat & Merino, Elena & Priego, Alba María, 2016. "The role of institutional shareholders as owners and directors and the financial distress likelihood. Evidence from a concentrated ownership context," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 439-451.
    7. Acero Fraile, Isabel & Alcalde Fradejas, Nuria, 2014. "Ownership structure and board composition in a high ownership concentration context," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 646-657.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:23:y:2005:i:5:p:542-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.