IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v22y2004i4p345-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic Research Networks:: A Key to Enhancing Scholarly Standing

Author

Listed:
  • Lowrie, Anthony
  • McKnight, Phillip J.

Abstract

While there is a prolific body of literature on social and organisation networks, there is no research on how academics develop and manage their research networks for the purpose of publication. This paper provides knowledge and understanding as to how academics develop and manage such networks. Many themes are presented that help academics develop and manage their networks. Key influences are identified. Network structures that academics use to facilitate publication are identified and implications for academics and business schools are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lowrie, Anthony & McKnight, Phillip J., 2004. "Academic Research Networks:: A Key to Enhancing Scholarly Standing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 345-360, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:22:y:2004:i:4:p:345-360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237304000696
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rhoda Ahoba-Sam & David Charles, 2019. "Building of Academics’ Networks—An analysis based on Causation and Effectuation theory," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 39(2), pages 143-161, October.
    2. Luis Cisneros & Mihai Ibanescu & Christian Keen & Odette Lobato-Calleros & Juan Niebla-Zatarain, 2018. "Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: mapping and analyzing authors’ networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 919-951, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:22:y:2004:i:4:p:345-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.