IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v21y2003i3p351-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Matrix Structures Work:: Creating Clarity on Unit Roles and Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Goold, Michael
  • Campbell, Andrew

Abstract

Managers often find matrix structures ambiguous, confusing and inefficient. A key reason for these problems is the lack of clarity on the roles that each unit in the matrix is intended to play. We therefore propose an approach to describing unit roles, responsibilities and relationships in a way that is clear, but not excessively detailed and hierarchical. We also put forward a new taxonomy of eight different typs of unit role. The taxonomy forces more clarity about basic differences in roles between units, and also helps in laying out different possible organisation design options in a powerful and concise way. It is therefore an essential component in making the matrix structure work.

Suggested Citation

  • Goold, Michael & Campbell, Andrew, 2003. "Making Matrix Structures Work:: Creating Clarity on Unit Roles and Responsibility," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 351-363, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:21:y:2003:i:3:p:351-363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237303000483
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:21:y:2003:i:3:p:351-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.