IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v20y2002i1p72-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Organizational Development and the Bottom Line:: Further Empirical Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Flamholtz, Eric
  • Hua, Wei

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical test of a holistic model of organizational success. It builds upon previous work by Flamholtz [Eur. Mngmt J. 13 (1995) 39] and Flamholtz and Aksehirli [Eur. Mngmt J. 14 (2000) 488] to develop a model of organizational success and failure. The initial model of Flamholtz (1995) proposed that there are six key factors or 'strategic building blocks' of successful organizations, and the six key variables must be designed as a holistic system, which has been termed 'The Pyramid of Organizational Development.' Subsequently, Flamholtz and Aksehirli (2000) proposed a link between the organizational development model and the financial success of organizations. They analyzed financial and non-financial information relevant to the hypothesized model for eight pairs of companies in different industries, and found a statistically significant relationship. This current paper builds upon the previous research and provides additional empirical evidence of the hypothesized link between the organizational development model and financial performance. However, this paper reports the results of a test within a single firm, using a set of fifteen relatively comparable divisions. A related research question concerned the thresholds of strategic organizational development for profitability of individual companies or operating units. Each division was evaluated in terms of the six key strategic building blocks. Scores were assigned to indicate the degree of each division's 'strategic organizational development.' This score and measures of financial performance ('EBIT') were used in a regression analysis to test the predictive validity of the framework. The results of the regression analysis suggest that there is a statistically significant relationship between the development of the six critical success factors and overall financial success of organizations. An analysis of the data on the relation between 'average pyramid score and EBIT' for each of the individual divisions was also conducted to determine threshold levels of 'strategic organizational development' and profitability. Accordingly, this research provides further empirical support for the hypothesized relationship between the Pyramid of Organizational Development model and the financial success of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Flamholtz, Eric & Hua, Wei, 2002. "Strategic Organizational Development and the Bottom Line:: Further Empirical Evidence," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 72-81, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:72-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237301001153
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yeongjun Yeo & Chansoo Park, 2018. "Managing Growing Pains for the Sustainable Growth of Organizations: Evidence from the Growth Pathways and Strategic Choices of Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Janne Harkonen & Harri Haapasalo & Kai Hanninen, 2013. "Productisation: A Literature Review," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    3. Harkonen, Janne & Haapasalo, Harri & Hanninen, Kai, 2015. "Productisation: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 65-82.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:72-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.