IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v17y1999i1p93-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What determines acquisition activity within an industry?

Author

Listed:
  • Schoenberg, Richard
  • Reeves, Richard

Abstract

Acquisitions in the UK have shown a steadily rising trend over recent years and one of the noticeable features of the current takeover wave is that it is concentrated in certain industry sectors. This article outlines five factors that may explain this variation in acquisition rates across industry sectors. An empirical investigation based on data from 200 UK industry sectors is then described which reveals that exposure to deregulation is in fact the most important single discriminator between industries with high and low acquisition activity. Industry concentration and industry growth rate are also supported as determinants of the takeover rate within an industry. The results suggest that external changes to industry regulation may act as a greater trigger to industry restructuring than internal industry dynamics, and raise important issues for policy makers given the contradictory findings on the economic benefits of M&A activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Schoenberg, Richard & Reeves, Richard, 1999. "What determines acquisition activity within an industry?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 93-98, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:17:y:1999:i:1:p:93-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237398000668
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheeba Kapil & Vrinda Rawal, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review of Private Equity Determinants: Status, Evidence and Open Issues," Vision, , vol. 27(5), pages 567-581, November.
    2. Ovtchinnikov, Alexei V., 2013. "Merger waves following industry deregulation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 51-76.
    3. Mike Fusillo, 2011. "Structural Factors Underlying Mergers and Acquisitions in Liner Shipping," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Chitra Singla, 2019. "Antecedents of Inbound and Outbound M&A: Industry-Level Analysis from India," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 703-739, October.
    5. Park, Sungwook & Kwon, Youngsun, 2023. "Disentangling the effects on OTT platform performance of three strategies: Pricing, M&As, and content investments," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).
    6. Campello, Murillo & Gao, Janet, 2017. "Customer concentration and loan contract terms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 108-136.
    7. Powell, Ronan & Yawson, Alfred, 2005. "Industry aspects of takeovers and divestitures: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 3015-3040, December.
    8. Arjen H. L. Slangen & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Jean-Francois Hennart, 2011. "The Impact of Cultural Distance on Bilateral Arm’s Length Exports," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 875-896, December.
    9. Monia Lougui & Anders Broström, 2021. "New firm formation in the wake of mergers and acquisitions: An exploration of push and pull factors," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 65-89, January.
    10. Lougui, Monia & Broström, Anders, 2016. "New firm formation in the wake of mergers and acquisitions: Are employees pushed or pulled into entrepreneurship?," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 427, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    11. Redkina, Anastasia (Редькина, Анастасия) & Lagodyuk, Ekaterina (Лагодюк, Екатерина), 2016. "The deterrent effect of Russian control of mergers: An Empirical Study [Сдерживающие Эффекты Российского Контроля Слияний: Эмпирическое Исследование]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 79-104, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:17:y:1999:i:1:p:93-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.