IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v15y1997i2p117-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns in the evolution of product competition

Author

Listed:
  • Christensen, Clayton

Abstract

Individual products may pass through life cycles of birth, growth, maturity and demise. But product categories and brands tend to follow cycles of evolution, rather than life cycles. The character of this evolution is determined by the cumulative changes in the attributes of individual new product models that are introduced within a given category. Recent studies of new products and services introduced in four very different industries - hydraulic excavators, disk drives, executive education and diabetes care - reveal a rather stunning regularity in how the nature or basis of competition has evolved in these industries. The article describes these patterns, and shows that the basic mechanism precipitating a shift from one basis to another is when the trajectory of improvement which product developers achieve is steeper than, and hence surpasses, the trajectory of performance improvement which customers in the market demand, or can absorb. In each of these cases, the initial basis upon which companies competed and were compared was the functionality of their product or service (hereafter called 'product'). However, technologists were able to improve the products' functionality at a faster rate than the market needed, or was able to absorb. As a result, multiple competitors 'overshot' customer needs in their mainstream market - their products improved to provide greater functionality than their customers could use. Continued differentiation along traditional measures of functionality, therefore, became competitively meaningless in each of these markets. When functionality had surpassed market need, the basis of competition, or the attributes along which companies could meaningfully claim advantage for their products over competitors, tended to shift to reliability. Measures related to the companies that manufactured and distributed them, became the meaningful metrics along which products were differentiated. The same phenomenon then occurred, however: industry technologists and managers were able to improve reliability at a faster rate than the industry was able to absorb, until multiple competing products were 'reliable enough': the trajectory of improvement in reliability had overshot what the mainstream market demanded. When this happened, reliability no longer was a competitively meaning dimension of differentiation. In each case, the focus of efforts to differentiate new products then shifted toward convenience. Customers began to favor products that had enough functionality and were reliable enough, but were more convenient to use, and were supplied and distributed by companies that were more convenient to deal with. But as companies then began focusing their innovative efforts on convenience as the new basis of competition, the same phenomenon recurred: the trajectory of improvement in convenience which product developers achieved, ultimately exceeded the convenience that the market demanded or was able to absorb. When multiple competitors offered products that were convenient enough, the basis of competition among products then shifted to price. The patterns in the evolution of competition in these industries result from the interaction of trajectories of performance improvement that technologists provided to their market, with the trajectories of performance improvement that customers demanded or could absorb. This article uses these insights to derive several propositions about when, how, and why the basis of competition can be expected to evolve.

Suggested Citation

  • Christensen, Clayton, 1997. "Patterns in the evolution of product competition," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 117-127, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:2:p:117-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237396000813
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kivi, Antero & Smura, Timo & Töyli, Juuso, 2012. "Technology product evolution and the diffusion of new product features," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 107-126.
    2. Rosanna Pittiglio & Filippo Reganati, 2015. "Multinational Enterprises, Technological Intensity and Firm Survival. Evidence from Italian Manufacturing and Services Firms," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 43(1), pages 87-106, March.
    3. Angelo Castaldo & Rosanna Pittiglio & Filippo Reganati & Domenico Sarno, 2023. "Access to bank financing and start‐up resilience: A survival analysis across business sectors in a time of crisis," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 91(3), pages 141-170, June.
    4. Da Silva, Filipe & Núñez Reyes, Georgina, 2021. "Free competition in the post-pandemic digital era: The impact on SMEs," Documentos de Proyectos 46661, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Yoon, Jungsub & Lee, Jeong-Dong & Hwang, Seogwon, 2022. "Episodic change: A new approach to identifying industrial transition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Zhengda Xu & Haiyao Liu & Song Lin, 2022. "The Influence of Government Green Development Policy on a Firm’s Disruptive Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Lasse Torkkeli & Hanna Salojärvi & Liisa-Maija Sainio & Sami Saarenketo, 2015. "Do All Roads Lead to Rome? The Effect of the Decision-Making Logic on Business Model Change," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(3), pages 5-24.
    8. Prithwiraj Choudhury & Evan Starr & Rajshree Agarwal, 2020. "Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1381-1411, August.
    9. Endo, Tadashi, 2022. "Endogenous market development for government securities in lower-income economies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. April M. Franco & MB Sarkar & Rajshree Agarwal & Raj Echambadi, 2009. "Swift and Smart: The Moderating Effects of Technological Capabilities on the Market Pioneering-Firm Survival Relationship," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(11), pages 1842-1860, November.
    11. Jinkuk Kim & Jungsub Yoon & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2021. "Dominant design and evolution of technological trajectories: The case of tank technology, 1915–1998," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 661-676, April.
    12. García-Villaverde, Pedro M. & Ruiz-Ortega, María J. & Parra-Requena, Gloria, 2012. "Towards a comprehensive model of entry timing in the ICT industry: Direct and indirect effects," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 297-310.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:2:p:117-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.