IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v15y1997i1p35-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-operation in a niche market: The case of fiat and PSA in multi purpose vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Jolly, Dominique

Abstract

Stimulated by the success of Renault in Europe and Chrysler in North America, PSA and Fiat decided to enter the emerging multi purpose vehicle market by forming an alliance to design, develop and manufacture an entirely new vehicle. The study of this case shows that the narrowness of this segment combined with a growing entry cost reduce the possibility of autonomous moves. As a consequence, the alliance has mainly been designed for sharing investments and risks, and for gaining economies of scale in a joint plant. As such, it offers a typical example of a scale alliance. However, we stress that those benefits are counterbalanced by the fact that when the allies go back to competition for commercialising the vehicles in their respective distribution networks, they offer quite similar products. It shows how far scale alliances are constraining (for example, reducing industrial diversity) and reduce the span of differentiation. The two partners agreed to entrust PSA with the day-to-day management of the alliance. As Fiat has similar responsibility for a previous ongoing alliance with PSA in light trucks, the new deal in multi purpose vehicles allowed the two partners to balance their respective powers and to create mutual dependence between themselves. This organisational form demonstrates how it is possible to solve classical problems in alliance management, that is, to limit the probability of opportunistic behaviours. This case also shows that dedicating the management of the alliance to one partner notably prevents the partners from learning from each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolly, Dominique, 1997. "Co-operation in a niche market: The case of fiat and PSA in multi purpose vehicles," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 35-44, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:1:p:35-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237396000722
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Guo & Xiaole Wu, 2018. "Capacity Sharing Between Competitors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3554-3573, August.
    2. Daozhi Zhao & Jiaqin Hao & Cejun Cao & Hongshuai Han, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Three-Player for Low-Carbon Production Capacity Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:1:p:35-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.