IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v12y1994i3p270-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The great IT benefit hunt

Author

Listed:
  • Farbey, Barbara
  • Targett, David
  • Land, Frank

Abstract

Too narrow a focus on overcoming organisational obstacles such as financial hurdle rates can often obstruct effective evaluation of investment in information technology (IT). To clear the hurdle rates with a minimum amount of organisational disturbance, evaluation procedures are often distorted. This may mean that 'difficult to handle' benefits are deliberately excluded from consideration, with many adverse effects. In this paper, Barbara Farbey, David Targett and Frank Land focus on the need for a comprehensive search for benefits of IT investment and the placing of all those benefits firmly on the management agenda. Doing so makes it more likely that the benefits will be achieved and also brings several other advantages to the organisation. They present three models of frameworks as a basis for the search. The first is strategic, the second organisational and the third technological. In each case they have filled the frameworks with benefits of IT investment which they have recorded over several years of research, in different projects. They do not see the filled frameworks as definitive. Instead they see them as pointers to places where benefits might reasonably be looked for and a starting point for a pragmatic dialogue.

Suggested Citation

  • Farbey, Barbara & Targett, David & Land, Frank, 1994. "The great IT benefit hunt," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 270-279, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:12:y:1994:i:3:p:270-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0263237394900612
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip, George & Booth, Marilyn E., 2001. "A new six 'S' framework on the relationship between the role of information systems (IS) and competencies in 'IS' management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 233-247, March.
    2. Gunasekaran, A. & Ngai, E.W.T. & McGaughey, R.E., 2006. "Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 957-983, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:12:y:1994:i:3:p:270-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.