IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v10y1992i2p173-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The competitive advantage of European nations: The impact of national culture -- a missing element in porter's analysis?

Author

Listed:
  • Van Den Bosch, Frans A. J.
  • Van Prooijen, Arno A.

Abstract

This article uses as its starting point Michael Porter's model of the national 'diamond' to explain the role of the national environment in the competitive position of industries and firms. The authors believe, however, that the influence of national culture on the competitive advantage of nations is given too little attention in this model. In particular, strong or weak uncertainty avoidance behaviour in nations and their masculine/feminine characteristics are neglected. The national diamond rests on the base of national culture, and the latter is exogenous to the firm. In a European context, managing the different diamonds that exist itself generates competitive advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Den Bosch, Frans A. J. & Van Prooijen, Arno A., 1992. "The competitive advantage of European nations: The impact of national culture -- a missing element in porter's analysis?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 173-177, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:10:y:1992:i:2:p:173-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026323739290066D
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alina HAGIU & Marinela BĂRBULESCU, 2013. "The Competitive Advantage Of Nations And The Particularities Of Romanian Companies," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 23-35, November.
    2. repec:cmj:journl:y:2013:i:29:hagiu is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Dekuwmini Mornah & Raymond MacDermott, 2016. "Culture as a Determinant of Competitive Advantage in Trade," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 9(1), pages 69-76, April.
    4. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel & Giuliani, Antonio Paco, 2014. "Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1177-1188.
    5. Yui-Yip Lau & Adolf Ky Ng & David Guerrero, 2014. "Becoming a major hub in the distribution of wine: Hong Kong as a gate to Asian markets," Post-Print hal-01069882, HAL.
    6. Angelos Kotios & Spyros Roukanas & Emmanouil Karakostas, 2019. "Protectionism or Strengthening Competitiveness: The Case of the United States of America," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 69(3), pages 21-34, July-Sept.
    7. Oz, Ozlem, 2002. "Assessing Porter's framework for national advantage: the case of Turkey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 509-515, June.
    8. Corinna Doegl, & Dirk Holtbruegge, 2010. "Competitive advantage of German renewable energy firms in Russsia – An empirical study based on Porter’s diamond," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 34-58.
    9. Ozlem Oz, 2001. "Sources of competitive advantage of Turkish construction companies in international markets," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 135-144.
    10. Arild Aspelund & Mohammad Javadinia Azari & Andreas Flåt Aglen & Sondre Gullord Graff, 2018. "The birth and development of a born global industry: The case of microelectronics in Norway," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 82-108, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:10:y:1992:i:2:p:173-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.