IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v94y2022ics0149718922000957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a most significant change approach to evaluate learner-centric outcomes of clinical scholars leadership training program

Author

Listed:
  • Henry, Ellison
  • Walker, Madison R.
  • Noble, Cheryl C.
  • Fernandez, Claudia S.P.
  • Corbie-Smith, Giselle
  • Dave, Gaurav

Abstract

Most significant change (MSC) analysis is an evaluative method used to supplement outcome and impact program evaluations. MSC stories provide mini-narratives contextualizing the effect a program had on an individual. The Clinical Scholars program evaluation team used MSC to explore learner-centric leadership outcomes of the Clinical Scholars leadership training program.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry, Ellison & Walker, Madison R. & Noble, Cheryl C. & Fernandez, Claudia S.P. & Corbie-Smith, Giselle & Dave, Gaurav, 2022. "Using a most significant change approach to evaluate learner-centric outcomes of clinical scholars leadership training program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000957
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000957
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saleh, S.S. & Williams, D. & Balougan, M., 2004. "Evaluating the effectiveness of public health leadership training: The NEPHLI experience," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(7), pages 1245-1249.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Onnis, Leigh-ann & Hakendorf, Marcia & Diamond, Mark & Tsey, Komla, 2019. "CQI approaches for evaluating management development programs: A case study with health service managers from geographically remote settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 91-101.
    2. Ga‐Young So, 2024. "How does diversity affect the effectiveness of capacity building training? Evidence from the Republic of Korea," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(3), May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.