IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v63y2017icp54-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining implementation and preliminary performance indicators of veterans treatment courts: The Kentucky experience

Author

Listed:
  • Shannon, Lisa M.
  • Birdwhistell, Shira
  • Hulbig, Shelia K.
  • Jones, Afton Jackson
  • Newell, Jennifer
  • Payne, Connie

Abstract

Veterans’ Treatment Courts (VTCs) are posited as a solution to offer rehabilitation for veterans involved in the criminal justice system. Despite the pervasive implementation of VTCs, there is little research focused specifically on VTC implementation and outcomes, which are based on other problem-solving court models such as drug court. The current study presents qualitative process evaluation data from key stakeholders (n=21) and veteran participants (n=4) to show accomplishments, challenges, and lessons learned during first-year implementation at two VTC sites. Quantitative performance data is also presented on veteran participants (n=19) served during the first year to show: types of services, monitoring, judicial interaction, sanctions/therapeutic responses, and rewards, as well as preliminary data on recidivism. Qualitative data, from both key stakeholders and veteran participants, suggests that offering rehabilitation via various program components, services/referrals, and accountability are critical to the success of the VTC. Data also provides valuable lessons learned for VTC implementation including communication, collaboration, information/protocols, and resources. Performance data shows that a variety of services are utilized and that frequent judicial interaction, drug testing, and sanctions are cornerstones of the VTC. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shannon, Lisa M. & Birdwhistell, Shira & Hulbig, Shelia K. & Jones, Afton Jackson & Newell, Jennifer & Payne, Connie, 2017. "Examining implementation and preliminary performance indicators of veterans treatment courts: The Kentucky experience," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 54-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:54-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.03.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718916302014
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.03.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shannon, Lisa M. & Hulbig, Shelia K. & Birdwhistell, Shira & Newell, Jennifer & Neal, Connie, 2015. "Implementation of an enhanced probation program: Evaluating process and preliminary outcomes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 50-62.
    2. Logan, TK & Hoyt, William H. & McCollister, Kathryn E. & French, Michael T. & Leukefeld, Carl & Minton, Lisa, 2004. "Economic evaluation of drug court: methodology, results, and policy implications," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 381-396, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johanna Catherine Maclean & Justine Mallatt & Christopher J. Ruhm & Kosali Simon, 2022. "The Opioid Crisis, Health, Healthcare, and Crime: A Review of Quasi-Experimental Economic Studies," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 703(1), pages 15-49, September.
    2. Zhang, Sheldon X. & Roberts, Robert E.L. & McCollister, Kathryn E., 2009. "An economic analysis of the in-prison therapeutic community model on prison management costs," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 388-395, July.
    3. Ioana Popovici & Michael T. French & James R. McKay, 2008. "Economic Evaluation of Continuing Care Interventions in the Treatment of Substance Abuse," Evaluation Review, , vol. 32(6), pages 547-568, December.
    4. DeMatteo, David & LaDuke, Casey & Locklair, Benjamin R. & Heilbrun, Kirk, 2013. "Community-based alternatives for justice-involved individuals with severe mental illness: Diversion, problem-solving courts, and reentry," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 64-71.
    5. Christine Godfrey, 2006. "Evidence-Based Illicit Drug Policy: The Potential Contribution of Economic Evaluation Techniques," De Economist, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 563-580, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:54-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.