IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v52y2015icp142-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demystifying reflective practice: Using the DATA model to enhance evaluators’ professional activities

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Tiffany L.
  • Barlow, Patrick B.
  • Peters, John M.
  • Skolits, Gary J.

Abstract

Reflective practice (RP), one of six essential competency domains in evaluation identified by Stevahn, King, Ghere, and Minnema (2005), refers to thinking critically about one's evaluation practice, alone or with other people, and using critical insights to improve one's practice. Currently, evaluators have minimal guidance in navigating this essential professional competency, professed to be a necessary part of their practice. This article focuses on how RP can serve as a tool for evaluators through the use of the “DATA” integrated RP framework, developed by Peters (1991, 2009). DATA is an acronym with each letter standing for a different step in the process of reflective practice. The “D” step of the acronym focuses on (D)escribing what is or has been happening in practice. The “A” step refers to (A)nalyzing the current state of practice—why is this happening the way it is? The “T” concentrates on a practice-oriented form of (T)heorizing, which comes from analysis and serves as a basis for the resulting (A)ct. The last “A” focuses on the specifics of an action plan to change one's evaluation practice in light of the practical theory developed through theorizing. This paper describes the DATA model and introduces the application of the framework in a practice context.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Tiffany L. & Barlow, Patrick B. & Peters, John M. & Skolits, Gary J., 2015. "Demystifying reflective practice: Using the DATA model to enhance evaluators’ professional activities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-147.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:142-147
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.04.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971891500049X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.04.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clinton, Janet M. & Hattie, John, 2021. "Cognitive complexity of evaluator competencies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Glasgow, LaShawn & Adams, Elizabeth & Smith, Lucia Rojas & Renaud, Jeanette, 2020. "Key Insights on Participation Measurement from Real-world Health Care Interventions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:142-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.