IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v33y2010i3p288-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double risk: Immigrant mothers, domestic violence and public child welfare services in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Earner, Ilze

Abstract

This paper examines the experiences of Mexican immigrant mothers living in New York City who become involved with public child welfare services because of domestic violence and makes recommendations for evaluation of program services to immigrant mothers. A case study and the results of a focus group interview will be presented to illustrate the often conflicting cultural, social and political issues confronted by immigrant mothers as they negotiate the organization of services designed to address specific forms of domestic violence, i.e., the protection of children and the protection of women. Emergent themes point to the double risk faced by immigrant women--first at the hands of their partners and then by service providers who do not understand the cultural issues that surround domestic violence nor the implications that immigration status has for victims of abuse. After intervention, participants in this research study describe feeling both like [`]bad mothers' who fail to protect their children and [`]bad women' who turn family members over for deportation. Evaluation of services to immigrant mothers requires consideration not only of cultural and social issues that affect program outcomes but must also consider the larger implications that immigration status has on utilization of services by immigrant women. Immigrant women often face multiple risks when seeking help for family problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Earner, Ilze, 2010. "Double risk: Immigrant mothers, domestic violence and public child welfare services in New York City," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 288-293, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:3:p:288-293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(09)00065-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mills, Linda G. & Friend, Colleen & Conroy, Kathryn & Fleck-Henderson, Ann & Krug, Stefan & Magen, Randy H. & Thomas, Rebecca L. & Trudeau, John H., 2000. "Child protection and domestic violence: Training, practice, and policy issues," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 315-332, May.
    2. Peter David Brandon, 2001. "State Intervention In Imperfect Families," Rationality and Society, , vol. 13(3), pages 285-303, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hughes, Judy & Chau, Shirley & Poff, Deborah C., 2011. ""They're not my favourite people": What mothers who have experienced intimate partner violence say about involvement in the child protection system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1084-1089, July.
    2. Dettlaff, Alan J. & Johnson, Michelle A., 2011. "Child maltreatment dynamics among immigrant and U.S. born Latino children: Findings from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NSCAW)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 936-944, June.
    3. Millett, Lina Sapokaite & Seay, Kristen D. & Kohl, Patricia L., 2015. "A national study of intimate partner violence risk among female caregivers involved in the child welfare system: The role of nativity, acculturation, and legal status," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 60-69.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nixon, Kendra L. & Tutty, Leslie M. & Weaver-Dunlop, Gillian & Walsh, Christine A., 2007. "Do good intentions beget good policy? A review of child protection policies to address intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1469-1486, December.
    2. Ogbonnaya, Ijeoma Nwabuzor & Keeney, Annie J., 2018. "A systematic review of the effectiveness of interagency and cross-system collaborations in the United States to improve child welfare outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 225-245.
    3. Saunders, Daniel G. & Anderson, Deborah, 2000. "Evaluation of a domestic violence training for child protection workers & supervisors: Initial results," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 373-395, May.
    4. Meyer, Andrea S. & McWey, Lenore M. & McKendrick, Wachell & Henderson, Tammy L., 2010. "Substance using parents, foster care, and termination of parental rights: The importance of risk factors for legal outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 639-649, May.
    5. Yoshihama, Mieko & Horrocks, Julie, 2010. "Risk of intimate partner violence: Role of childhood sexual abuse and sexual initiation in women in Japan," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 28-37, January.
    6. Shim, Woochan S. & Haight, Wendy L., 2006. "Supporting battered women and their children: Perspectives of battered mothers and child welfare professionals," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 620-637, June.
    7. Friend, Colleen, 2000. "Woman abuse and child protection: A tumultuous marriage (volume ii)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 309-314, May.
    8. McCrae, Julie S. & Cahalane, Helen & Fusco, Rachel A., 2011. "Directions for developmental screening in child welfare based on the ages and stages questionnaires," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1412-1418, August.
    9. Friend, Colleen & Shlonsky, Aron & Lambert, Liz, 2008. "From evolving discourses to new practice approaches in domestic violence and child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 689-698, June.
    10. Renner, Lynette M., 2011. ""I'm wondering if I am completely missing that": Foster care case managers and supervisors report on their IPV training," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 386-394, February.
    11. Olszowy, Laura & Jaffe, Peter G. & Dawson, Myrna & Straatman, Anna-Lee & Saxton, Michael D., 2020. "Voices from the frontline: Child protection workers’ perspectives on barriers to assessing risk in domestic violence cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Katerina Hadjimatheou, 2022. "‘Social Care Told me I Had to’: Empowerment And Responsibilization in The Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(2), pages 320-336.
    13. Buckley, Helen & Whelan, Sadhbh & Carr, Nicola, 2011. "'Like waking up in a Franz Kafka novel': Service users' experiences of the child protection system when domestic violence and acrimonious separations are involved," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 126-133, January.
    14. Hartley, Carolyn C., 2004. "Severe domestic violence and child maltreatment: considering child physical abuse, neglect, and failure to protect," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 373-392, April.
    15. Yearwood, Douglas L. & Dowd, Keith & Starsoneck, Leslie, 2008. "Exploring alternatives for improving child support application filing rates within the context of civil protection order cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 821-833, July.
    16. Button, Deeanna M. & Payne, Brian K., 2009. "Training child protective services workers about domestic violence: Needs, strategies, and barriers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 364-369, March.
    17. Lawson, Jennifer, 2019. "Domestic violence as child maltreatment: Differential risks and outcomes among cases referred to child welfare agencies for domestic violence exposure," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 32-41.
    18. Kohl, Patricia L. & Barth, Richard P. & Hazen, Andrea L. & Landsverk, John A., 2005. "Child welfare as a gateway to domestic violence services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(11), pages 1203-1221, November.
    19. Renner, Lynette M., 2011. "The presence of IPV in foster care cases: Examining referrals for services, reunification goals, and system responsibility," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 980-990, June.
    20. Moles, Kerry, 2008. "Bridging the divide between child welfare and domestic violence services: Deconstructing the change process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 674-688, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:3:p:288-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.