IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v26y2003i3p263-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A process evaluation of a parenting group for parents with intellectual disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Heinz, Laura C.
  • Grant, Peter R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinz, Laura C. & Grant, Peter R., 2003. "A process evaluation of a parenting group for parents with intellectual disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 263-274, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:26:y:2003:i:3:p:263-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(03)00030-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grant, Peter R., 1997. "The relocation of nursing home residents: An illustration of the advantages gained by planning a new program and designing an implementation evaluation together," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 507-516, November.
    2. Mathison, Sandra, 1994. "Rethinking the evaluator role: Partnerships between organizations and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 299-304.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hogard, Elaine, 2008. "Purpose and method for the evaluation of interpersonal process in health and social care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 34-40, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grant, Peter R., 1997. "The relocation of nursing home residents: An illustration of the advantages gained by planning a new program and designing an implementation evaluation together," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 507-516, November.
    2. Olsen, Odd Einar & Lindoe, Preben, 2004. "Trailing research based evaluation; phases and roles," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 371-380, November.
    3. Damien S. E. Broekharst & Mara P. J. Brouwers & Annerieke Stoop & Wilco P. Achterberg & Monique A. A. Caljouw, 2022. "Types, Aspects, and Impact of Relocation Initiatives Deployed within and between Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Blaser Mapitsa, Caitlin & Chirau, Takunda J., 2019. "Institutionalising the evaluation function: A South African study of impartiality, use and cost," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 38-42.
    5. Willging, Cathleen E. & Helitzer, Deborah & Thompson, Janice, 2006. "`Sharing wisdom': Lessons learned during the development of a diabetes prevention intervention for urban American Indian women," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 130-140, May.
    6. O’Neil, Glenn & Bauer, Martin W., 2018. "Pathways to use of communication campaigns’ evaluation findings within international organizations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 82-91.
    7. Nichols, Laura, 2002. "Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    8. McDonald, Diane, 1999. "Developing guidelines to enhance the evaluation of overseas development projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 163-174, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:26:y:2003:i:3:p:263-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.