IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v18y1995i2p129-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the quality of evaluations of federal human services national demonstration programs

Author

Listed:
  • Stahler, Gerald J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stahler, Gerald J., 1995. "Improving the quality of evaluations of federal human services national demonstration programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 129-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:18:y:1995:i:2:p:129-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149-7189(95)00004-U
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth A. Leithwood & Deborah J. Montgomery, 1980. "Evaluating Program Implementation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 4(2), pages 193-214, April.
    2. John S. Brekke, 1987. "The Model-Guided Method for Monitoring Program Implementation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 11(3), pages 281-299, June.
    3. Eva Lantos Rezmovic, 1984. "Assessing Treatment Implementation Amid the Slings and Arrows of Reality," Evaluation Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 187-204, April.
    4. Mary Ann Scheirer & Eva Lantos Rezmovic, 1983. "Measuring the Degree of Program Implementation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(5), pages 599-633, October.
    5. Jennifer C. Greene & Joan Doughty & Jules M. Marquart & Marilyn L. Ray & Lynn Roberts, 1988. "Qualitative Evaluation Audits in Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 12(4), pages 352-375, August.
    6. Moskowitz, Joel M., 1993. "Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable : Examples from evaluations of drug abuse prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gorman, Dennis M. & Conde, Eugenia, 2007. "Conflict of interest in the evaluation and dissemination of "model" school-based drug and violence prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 422-429, November.
    2. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B. Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1995. "An Evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), Using a Solomon Four-Group Design With Latent Variables," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 409-435, August.
    3. Green, Rex S., 2003. "Assessing the productivity of human service programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 21-27, February.
    4. Braver, Sanford L. & Smith, Melanie C., 1996. "Maximizing both external and internal validity in longitudinal true experiments with voluntary treatments: The "combined modified" design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 287-300, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:18:y:1995:i:2:p:129-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.