IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v104y2024ics0149718924000326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using theory knitting to conceptualize social phenomena in the design and evaluation of dance programs for people living with Parkinson’s disease

Author

Listed:
  • Senter, Morgan
  • Clifford, Amanda M.
  • Bhriain, Orfhlaith Ni

Abstract

Dance programs for people living with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD) offer participants an opportunity to exercise, engage in artistic self-expression, and form new relationships. While it is understood that the social dimension of dance programs for PwPD contributes to dancer satisfaction and program sustainability, the social mechanisms instrumental to program success are under-examined. Engaging with theory from wider disciplines, or “theory knitting” can help program designers and evaluators examine the mechanisms and contextual factors that make classes socially meaningful with greater detail and specificity. This study identified and examined three theoretical frameworks that program planners and evaluators could use to conceptualize social engagement in dance for PwPD contexts and inform practice. Each theory was assessed for fit using the T-CaST theory comparison and selection tool developed by Birken et al. (2018). As an example, we used anthropologist Victor Turner’s (1970; 1977) theory of liminality and communitas to identify five key areas for fostering a sense of social connection in dance for PwPD contexts: (1) selecting a meaningful dance space (2) creating a joyous atmosphere (3) marking entrance into the liminal time and space with rituals (4) embodying liminality and anti-structure and (5) inverting power relations and embracing fluid roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Senter, Morgan & Clifford, Amanda M. & Bhriain, Orfhlaith Ni, 2024. "Using theory knitting to conceptualize social phenomena in the design and evaluation of dance programs for people living with Parkinson’s disease," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000326
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibson, Rachael & Robichaud, Sarah, 2020. "Evaluating Dancing With Parkinson's: Reflections from the perspective of a community organization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Nakaima, April, 2020. "Valuing and embracing complexity: How an understanding of complex interventions needs to shape our evaluation capacities building initiatives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Anna M Carapellotti & Rebecca Stevenson & Michail Doumas, 2020. "The efficacy of dance for improving motor impairments, non-motor symptoms, and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Nakaima, April & Sridharan, Sanjeev & Gibson, Rachael, 2023. "Towards an evolutionary approach to learning from assumptions: Lessons from the evaluation of Dancing with Parkinson’s," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Nakaima, April & Sridharan, Sanjeev, 2020. "Reflections on experiential learning in evaluation capacity building with a community organization, Dancing With Parkinson’s," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nakaima, April & Sridharan, Sanjeev & Gibson, Rachael, 2023. "Towards an evolutionary approach to learning from assumptions: Lessons from the evaluation of Dancing with Parkinson’s," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Teasdale, Rebecca M., 2022. "Representing the values of program participants: Endogenous evaluative criteria," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Peter Gates & Fred M. Discenzo & Jin Hyun Kim & Zachary Lemke & Joan Meggitt & Angela L. Ridgel, 2022. "Analysis of Movement Entropy during Community Dance Programs for People with Parkinson’s Disease and Older Adults: A Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Lucía Bracco & Clara Cornaro & Arrate Pinto-Carral & Sabine C. Koch & France Mourey, 2023. "Tango-Therapy Intervention for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment Living in Nursing Homes: Effects on Quality of Life, Physical Abilities and Gait," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Livia P. Carvalho & Simon Décary & Isabelle Beaulieu-Boire & Rosalie Dostie & Isabelle Lalonde & Émilie Texier & Laurence Laprise & Elizabeth Pepin & Mélodie Gilbert & Hélène Corriveau & Michel Tousig, 2021. "Baduanjin Qigong Intervention by Telerehabilitation (TeleParkinson): A Proof-of-Concept Study in Parkinson’s Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.