IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v104y2024ics0149718924000302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence-based practice criteria’s effect on the implementation of the Family First Prevention Services Act in Nebraska and Colorado

Author

Listed:
  • Carmody, Charity

Abstract

Child abuse, particularly neglect, is often preventable because many causes of harm stem from poverty, lack of social connections, substance use disorders, mental illness, lack of childcare, and other family support shortages. Prevention of child abuse and neglect starts with family support in these areas. The federal government recognized this need for prevention, and through considerable bipartisan support, passed the Family First Prevention Services Act on February 9, 2018. The Family First Prevention Services Act was designed to divert investment away from long-term foster care and toward programs that prevent unnecessary placement and child protective services interventions. The Family First Prevention Services Act restricts the state’s use of federal funds for institutional foster care placements and uses those savings to fund reimbursements for evidence-based family preservation. The requirement for evidence-based prevention is a first in child-welfare federal law, and compliance with this requirement requires public-private partnership with agencies implementing the models, infrastructure, and evaluation standards that most states must build to be eligible for the new funding. This evaluation research analyzed how the stringent guidelines for prevention funding and the requirement of federally approved evidence-based practice programming affect the implementation of the Family First Prevention Services Act in Nebraska and Colorado.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmody, Charity, 2024. "Evidence-based practice criteria’s effect on the implementation of the Family First Prevention Services Act in Nebraska and Colorado," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000302
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leathers, Sonya J. & Melka-Kaffer, Catherine & Spielfogel, Jill E. & Atkins, Marc S., 2016. "Use of evidence-based interventions in child welfare: Do attitudes matter?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 375-382.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aaltio, Elina, 2023. "Evaluating the effectiveness of the systemic practice model of children’s social care – A pilot study on child- and family-level outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Myers, Christina & Garcia, Antonio & Beidas, Rinad & Yang, Zixiaojie, 2020. "Factors that predict child welfare caseworker referrals to an evidence-based parenting program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.