IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v40y2012i1p226-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proposed methodology for the calculation of direct consumption of fossil fuels and electricity for livestock breeding, and its application to Cyprus

Author

Listed:
  • Kythreotou, Nicoletta
  • Florides, Georgios
  • Tassou, Savvas A.

Abstract

On-farm energy consumption is becoming increasingly important in the context of rising energy costs and concerns over greenhouse gas emissions. For farmers throughout the world, energy inputs represent a major and rapidly increasing cost. In many countries such as Cyprus, however, there is lack of systematic research on energy use in agriculture, which hinders benchmarking end evaluation of approaches and investment decisions for energy improvement. This study established a methodology for the estimation of the direct consumption of fossil fuels and electricity for livestock breeding, excluding transport, for locations where full data sets are not available. This methodology was then used to estimate fossil fuel and electricity consumption for livestock breeding in Cyprus. For 2008, this energy was found to be equivalent to 40.3 GWh that corresponds to 8% of the energy used in agriculture. Differences between the energy consumption per animal in Cyprus and other countries was found to be mainly due to differences in climatic conditions and technologies used in the farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Florides, Georgios & Tassou, Savvas A., 2012. "A proposed methodology for the calculation of direct consumption of fossil fuels and electricity for livestock breeding, and its application to Cyprus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 226-235.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:40:y:2012:i:1:p:226-235
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544212000928
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahiya, A.K. & Vasudevan, P., 1986. "A Field study of energy consumption pattern on small farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(7), pages 685-689.
    2. Heidari, M.D. & Omid, M. & Akram, A., 2011. "Energy efficiency and econometric analysis of broiler production farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6536-6541.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van linden, Veerle & Herman, Lieve, 2014. "A fuel consumption model for off-road use of mobile machinery in agriculture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 880-889.
    2. Kari-Anne Lyng & Mia Bjerkestrand & Aina Elstad Stensgård & Pieter Callewaert & Ole Jørgen Hanssen, 2018. "Optimising Anaerobic Digestion of Manure Resources at a Regional Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Myeong Gil Jeong & Dhanushka Rathnayake & Hong Seok Mun & Muhammad Ammar Dilawar & Kwang Woo Park & Sang Ro Lee & Chul Ju Yang, 2020. "Effect of a Sustainable Air Heat Pump System on Energy Efficiency, Housing Environment, and Productivity Traits in a Pig Farm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Ilyas, Hafiz Muhammad Abrar & Safa, Majeed & Bailey, Alison & Rauf, Sara & Cullen, Mat, 2019. "Pr - Evaluation Of Energy Footprint Of Pastoral And Barn Dairy Farming Systems In New Zealand," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345886, International Farm Management Association.
    5. Nacer, T. & Hamidat, A. & Nadjemi, O. & Bey, M., 2016. "Feasibility study of grid connected photovoltaic system in family farms for electricity generation in rural areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 305-318.
    6. Cristina Sáez Blázquez & David Borge-Diez & Ignacio Martín Nieto & Miguel Ángel Maté-González & Arturo Farfán Martín & Diego González-Aguilera, 2022. "Geothermal Heat Pumps for Slurry Cooling and Farm Heating: Impact and Carbon Footprint Reduction in Pig Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Antonio José Steidle Neto & Daniela de Carvalho Lopes, 2021. "Technical analysis of photovoltaic energy generation for supplying the electricity demand in Brazilian dairy farms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1355-1370, February.
    8. Blázquez, Cristina Sáez & Borge-Diez, David & Nieto, Ignacio Martín & Maté-González, Miguel Ángel & Martín, Arturo Farfán & González-Aguilera, Diego, 2021. "Investigating the potential of the slurry technology for sustainable pig farm heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    2. Devadas, V., 2001. "Planning for rural energy system: part I," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 203-226, September.
    3. Marcin Wysokiński & Bogdan Klepacki & Piotr Gradziuk & Magdalena Golonko & Piotr Gołasa & Wioletta Bieńkowska-Gołasa & Barbara Gradziuk & Paulina Trębska & Aleksandra Lubańska & Danuta Guzal-Dec & Ark, 2021. "Economic and Energy Efficiency of Farms in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Li, Y. & Arulnathan, V. & Heidari, M.D. & Pelletier, N., 2022. "Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Lei Wang & Ruyin Long & Hong Chen, 2017. "Study of Urban Energy Performance Assessment and Its Influencing Factors Based on Improved Stochastic Frontier Analysis: A Case Study of Provincial Capitals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab, 2022. "Estimating smart energy inputs packages using hybrid optimisation technique to mitigate environmental emissions of commercial fish farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    7. Mohammad Sharifi & Shamsi Soodmand-Moghaddam & Hesam Moloudi, 2024. "Investigation of environmental, energy and economic indicators of the turkey breeding farms: a case study in West Azarbaijan and Zanjan, Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24221-24245, September.
    8. Elahi, Ehsan & Weijun, Cui & Jha, Sunil Kumar & Zhang, Huiming, 2019. "Estimation of realistic renewable and non-renewable energy use targets for livestock production systems utilising an artificial neural network method: A step towards livestock sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 191-204.
    9. Jernej Prišenk & Maksimiljan Brus, 2022. "Economic Viability of Alternative Bedding Material in Broiler Chicken Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-10, March.
    10. Honorata Sierocka & Maciej Zajkowski & Grzegorz Hołdyński & Zbigniew Sołjan, 2023. "Characteristics of Electricity Consumption on the Example of Poultry Farming in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Mondani, Farzad & Riahinia, Shahram, 2012. "Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of sugar beet production system in Iran: A case study in Khorasan Razavi province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1078-1084.
    12. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Akram, Asadolah & Ghobadian, Barat & Rafiee, Shahin & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2014. "Energy-economic life cycle assessment (LCA) and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of olive oil production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 139-149.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:40:y:2012:i:1:p:226-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.