IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v314y2025ics0360544224039136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education and energy poverty: Evidence from China's compulsory education law

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Yinhe
  • Liu, Xi
  • Yu, Sitian

Abstract

Addressing energy poverty remains a critical global challenge, especially in developing countries. While education's role in poverty reduction is well-studied, its impact on energy poverty and energy justice is less explored. Using China's 1986 Compulsory Education Law as an exogenous shock, this study examines the causal effects of education on household energy poverty and energy justice, based on data from the China Family Panel Survey. We find that each additional year of education reduces the likelihood of experiencing energy poverty by 2.3 %. The key mechanisms are returns to human capital and borrowing constraints. Education's impact is particularly strong for disadvantaged groups, such as women and rural residents, highlighting its dual role in alleviating energy poverty and promoting energy justice. This study offers valuable policy implications and scientific support to help reduce household-level energy poverty and advance the goal of energy justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Yinhe & Liu, Xi & Yu, Sitian, 2025. "Education and energy poverty: Evidence from China's compulsory education law," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:314:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224039136
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.134135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224039136
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Education; Energy poverty; China's compulsory education law; Energy justice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • I26 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Returns to Education
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:314:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224039136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.