IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v286y2024ics0360544223030414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, exergy, environmental, and economic analyses and multiobjective optimization of a DSORC system for waste heat utilization in low-concentration gas power generation

Author

Listed:
  • Bu, Shujuan
  • Yang, Xinle
  • Li, Weikang
  • Dai, Wenzhi
  • Su, Chang
  • Wang, Xin
  • Liu, Xunan
  • Yu, Ning
  • Wang, Guanyu

Abstract

This paper proposes a dual-loop ORC system with working fluid shunting (DSORC) for waste heat recovery from low-concentration gas power generation. Thermodynamic models based on pinch points position changes, environmental models based on life cycle assessment, and economic models are established to analyze energy, exergy, environmental, and economic performances of the DSORC system. Multiobjective optimization is performed by GA to reveal the best performance. The results show that the thermodynamic performance of the DSORC system is better than that of the DORC system, and the exergy destruction is smaller in the evaporative condenser, low-temperature evaporator, and low-temperature preheater of the DSORC system. The proportions of ADP and GWP are large in the weighted environmental potential of the DSORC system. The weighted environmental potential generated by the operating process is more than 97 %, but the steel consumption per unit of power generation is the most sensitive to the environmental impact. The optimal P6 is close to the maximum P6 that can be achieved for each working fluid, the optimal P2 ranges from 9.92 MPa to 10.99 MPa, and the optimal P3 ranges from 0.22 MPa to 0.23 MPa.

Suggested Citation

  • Bu, Shujuan & Yang, Xinle & Li, Weikang & Dai, Wenzhi & Su, Chang & Wang, Xin & Liu, Xunan & Yu, Ning & Wang, Guanyu, 2024. "Energy, exergy, environmental, and economic analyses and multiobjective optimization of a DSORC system for waste heat utilization in low-concentration gas power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:286:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223030414
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223030414
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Haozhong & Zhu, Juan & Deng, Wei & Ouyang, Tiancheng & Yan, Bo & Yang, Xu, 2018. "Influence of exhaust heat distribution on the performance of dual-loop organic Rankine Cycles (DORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 54-65.
    2. Shu, Gequn & Liu, Lina & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Yu, Guopeng, 2014. "Parametric and working fluid analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) used in engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1188-1198.
    3. Yu, Haoshui & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2015. "A new pinch based method for simultaneous selection of working fluid and operating conditions in an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) recovering waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 36-46.
    4. Liu, Chao & He, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2013. "The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 144-154.
    5. Wang, Zhiqi & Hu, Yanhua & Xia, Xiaoxia & Zuo, Qingsong & Zhao, Bin & Li, Zhixiong, 2020. "Thermo-economic selection criteria of working fluid used in dual-loop ORC for engine waste heat recovery by multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Ding, Yang & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Cheng & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Mao, Lianfei, 2018. "Exergoenvironmental model of Organic Rankine Cycle system including the manufacture and leakage of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 52-64.
    7. Sarkar, Jahar, 2018. "Generalized pinch point design method of subcritical-supercritical organic Rankine cycle for maximum heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 141-150.
    8. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia, Xiaoxia & Liu, Zhipeng & Wang, Zhiqi & Sun, Tong & Zhang, Hualong & Zhang, Sifeng, 2023. "Thermo-economic-environmental optimization design of dual-loop organic Rankine cycle under fluctuating heat source temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Baofeng Yao & Xu Ping & Hongguang Zhang, 2021. "Dynamic Response Characteristics Analysis and Energy, Exergy, and Economic (3E) Evaluation of Dual Loop Organic Rankine Cycle (DORC) for CNG Engine Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, September.
    3. Wang, Zhiqi & Hu, Yanhua & Xia, Xiaoxia & Zuo, Qingsong & Zhao, Bin & Li, Zhixiong, 2020. "Thermo-economic selection criteria of working fluid used in dual-loop ORC for engine waste heat recovery by multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Javier Cárdenas Gutierrez & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Exergy, Economic, and Life-Cycle Assessment of ORC System for Waste Heat Recovery in a Natural Gas Internal Combustion Engine," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Wang, Shiqi & Yuan, Zhongyuan & Yu, Nanyang, 2023. "Thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle with steam-water dual heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Ping, Xu & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Xing, Chengda & Zhang, Wujie & Wang, Yan & Yao, Baofeng, 2023. "Dynamic response assessment and multi-objective optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) under vehicle driving cycle conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    7. Yu, Xiaoli & Li, Zhi & Lu, Yiji & Huang, Rui & Roskilly, Anthony Paul, 2019. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycle integrated with double latent thermal energy storage for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1098-1112.
    8. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Alklaibi, A.M. & Lior, N., 2021. "Waste heat utilization from internal combustion engines for power augmentation and refrigeration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Carlos Acevedo Peñaloza & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2019. "Thermoeconomic Optimization with PSO Algorithm of Waste Heat Recovery Systems Based on Organic Rankine Cycle System for a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Long Lyu & Wu Chen & Ankang Kan & Yuan Zhang & Song Xue & Jingbin Zeng, 2022. "Investigation of a Dual-Loop ORC for the Waste Heat Recovery of a Marine Main Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    13. Ping, Xu & Yao, Baofeng & Zhang, Hongguang & Yang, Fubin, 2021. "Thermodynamic analysis and high-dimensional evolutionary many-objective optimization of dual loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    14. Feng, Yong-qiang & Zhang, Fei-yang & Xu, Jing-wei & He, Zhi-xia & Zhang, Qiang & Xu, Kang-jing, 2023. "Parametric analysis and multi-objective optimization of biomass-fired organic Rankine cycle system combined heat and power under three operation strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 431-449.
    15. Kang, Lixia & Tang, Jianping & Liu, Yongzhong, 2020. "Optimal design of an organic Rankine cycle system considering the expected variations on heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Juan J. García-Pabón & Dario Méndez-Méndez & Juan M. Belman-Flores & Juan M. Barroso-Maldonado & Ali Khosravi, 2021. "A Review of Recent Research on the Use of R1234yf as an Environmentally Friendly Fluid in the Organic Rankine Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Aldair Benavides Gamero & Josué Camargo Vanegas & Jorge Duarte Forero & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Rafael Diaz Herazo, 2023. "Advanced Exergo-Environmental Assessments of an Organic Rankine Cycle as Waste Heat Recovery System from a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Song, Songsong & Bei, Chen & Wang, Hongjin & Wang, Enhua, 2015. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of an organic Rankine cycle for exhaust waste heat recovery of a diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2208-2228.
    19. Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua & Meng, Fanxiao & Liu, Hongda & Wang, Jingfu, 2017. "Parametric optimization and heat transfer analysis of a dual loop ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 753-775.
    20. Yu, Haoshui & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Eason, John, 2016. "A systematic method to customize an efficient organic Rankine cycle (ORC) to recover waste heat in refineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 302-315.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:286:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223030414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.