IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v20y1995i6p471-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Findings from a low-energy, new commercial-buildings research and demonstration project

Author

Listed:
  • Piette, Mary Ann
  • Nordman, Bruce
  • de Buen, Odon
  • Diamond, Rick

Abstract

Energy edge (EE) was a research-oriented demonstration project that began in 1985; 28 buildings were constructed to use 30% less electricity than a hypothetical simulated baseline building. Average energy savings for 18 buildings evaluated with post-occupancy tuned simulation models were less at 17%. Only six met the cost of conserved (CCE) energy of 5.6 ¢/kWh for the total package of energy-efficiency measures because the building characteristics changed from design assumptions. Forty-one percent of the individual energy-efficiency measures met the target CCE. The cost effectiveness of the measures would have been greater if the baseline had been common practice rather than the regional building code. The EE small offices use about 30–50% less energy than comparable buildings. Savings also would have been greater if commissioning was included within the program. Future projects should consider lower-cost “hands-on” evaluation techniques with annual check-ups to ensure persistence of savings.

Suggested Citation

  • Piette, Mary Ann & Nordman, Bruce & de Buen, Odon & Diamond, Rick, 1995. "Findings from a low-energy, new commercial-buildings research and demonstration project," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 471-482.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:20:y:1995:i:6:p:471-482
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(94)00089-L
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036054429400089L
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(94)00089-L?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salon, Deborah & Sperling, Dan & Meier, Alan & Murphy, Sinnott & Gorham, Roger & Barrett, James, 2008. "City carbon budgets: Aligning incentives for climate-friendly communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4c07z5nq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2017. "Demonstrating sustainable energy: A review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1349-1362.
    3. Peter Olabisi Oluseyi & Tobiloba Emmanuel Somefun & Olubayo Moses Babatunde & Tolulope Olusegun Akinbulire & Oluleke O. Babayomi & Samuel A. Isaac & Damilola Elizabeth Babatunde, 2020. "Evaluation of Energy-efficiency in Lighting Systems for Public Buildings," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 435-439.
    4. Salon, Deborah & Sperling, Dan & Meier, Alan & Murphy, Sinnott & Gorham, Roger & Barrett, James, 2008. "City carbon budgets: Aligning incentives for climate-friendly communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0hp71320, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Petersen, Steffen & Svendsen, Svend, 2012. "Method for component-based economical optimisation for use in design of new low-energy buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 173-180.
    6. Di Stefano, Julian, 2000. "Energy efficiency and the environment: the potential for energy efficient lighting to save energy and reduce carbon dioxide emissions at Melbourne University, Australia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(9), pages 823-839.
    7. Salon, Deborah & Sperling, Daniel & Meier, Alan & Murphy, Sinnott & Gorham, Roger & Barrett, James, 2010. "City carbon budgets: A proposal to align incentives for climate-friendly communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 2032-2041, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:20:y:1995:i:6:p:471-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.