IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v182y2019icp211-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boundaries of high-power charging for long-range battery electric car from the heat generation perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Jiuyu
  • Mo, Xinying
  • Li, Yalun
  • Zhang, Qun
  • Li, Jianqiu
  • Wu, Xiaogang
  • Lu, Languang
  • Ouyang, Minggao

Abstract

High-power charging (HPC) has been associated with a great potential to shorten the charging time, relative to increasing the all-electric range (AER) of battery electric cars (BECs). Such promise of applicability is however restrained by setbacks attributed to the high-voltage system of BECs, its negative influence on the battery performance, and a higher requirement of charging infrastructures. More importantly, the core issue is the functionality of the battery, as research has found that HPC may cause a high charging rate on the battery cell that consequently promotes its heat generation and eventually results in a significant loss of functionality and safety degradation. Considering these elements, the thermal reaction of a battery under HPC is seemingly the key toward the design of an effective thermal management system. Thus, we conducted the present study with a focal objective of examining the thermal reaction of a traction battery to the HPC, to evaluate the gap between existing battery technologies and HPC to find the suitable condition. We investigated the heat generation characteristics of Nickel–Cobalt–Manganese (NCM) and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries by HPC testing in non-adiabatic and adiabatic conditions, respectively, for different charging rates from 0.5 to 5.0C. We analyzed and incorporated the test results to establish a model of battery heat generation, which could predict temperature rise under specified conditions. Moreover, we proposed an HPC operating boundary by considering the present battery technologies. The findings herein indicate that the increased charging rate leading to higher heat generation and lower charge efficiency can be effectively handled through specific thermal management, which, with the boundary, provides a limit for the optimal operation region to avoid safety risk. More practically, a good thermal management system is required to control the boundary setting and extend the operation region of battery charging.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Jiuyu & Mo, Xinying & Li, Yalun & Zhang, Qun & Li, Jianqiu & Wu, Xiaogang & Lu, Languang & Ouyang, Minggao, 2019. "Boundaries of high-power charging for long-range battery electric car from the heat generation perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 211-223.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:182:y:2019:i:c:p:211-223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219311144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Yalun & Gao, Xinlei & Feng, Xuning & Ren, Dongsheng & Li, Yan & Hou, Junxian & Wu, Yu & Du, Jiuyu & Lu, Languang & Ouyang, Minggao, 2022. "Battery eruption triggered by plated lithium on an anode during thermal runaway after fast charging," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    2. Thomas Märzinger & David Wöss & Petra Steinmetz & Werner Müller & Tobias Pröll, 2021. "Novel Modelling Approach for the Calculation of the Loading Performance of Charging Stations for E-Trucks to Represent Fleet Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:182:y:2019:i:c:p:211-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.