IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v181y2019icp724-737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiparameter probability distributions for at-site frequency analysis of annual maximum wind speed with L-Moments for parameter estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Fawad, Muhammad
  • Yan, Ting
  • Chen, Lu
  • Huang, Kangdi
  • Singh, Vijay P.

Abstract

Estimation of quantiles of Annual Maximum Wind Speed (AMWS) is needed in different environmental fields, engineering risk analysis, design of structures, renewable energy sources, agricultural operations, and climatology. Therefore, wind speed frequency analysis (WSFA) was carried out at nine stations from Pakistan. Multiparameter Probability Distributions (PDs), such as Generalized logistic (GLO), Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Generalized Normal (GNO), Generalized Pareto (GPA), Weibull (WEI), Pearson type 3 (P3), Log Pearson type 3 (LP3); and two parameter PDs, such as Logistic (LOG), Normal (NOR), Gumbel (GUM), Exponential (EXP), and Uniform (UNI) were used to determine the most suitable distributions for the nine stations. The method of L-moments was used for estimating parameters of the distributions. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test, Anderson-Darling (AD) test, Minimum L-Kurtosis (ML-K) Difference Criterion, and L-moment ratio diagram (L-ratio diagram) showed that four distributions, namely GEV, GNO, GPA, and GLO were the most suitable distributions for different stations and were superior to the two-parameter distributions. The quantile estimates (design estimates) from multiparameter PDs provide information on how fast the maximum wind will pass through a certain place and hence are important for policy makers and planners in the design and construction of different structures. The Multivariate Diebold–Mariano (DM) test was applied to check the accuracy of design estimates from the best fitted PDs and results indicated that they were significantly different.

Suggested Citation

  • Fawad, Muhammad & Yan, Ting & Chen, Lu & Huang, Kangdi & Singh, Vijay P., 2019. "Multiparameter probability distributions for at-site frequency analysis of annual maximum wind speed with L-Moments for parameter estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 724-737.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:724-737
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219310357
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariano, Roberto S. & Preve, Daniel, 2012. "Statistical tests for multiple forecast comparison," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 123-130.
    2. Raffaella Giacomini & Halbert White, 2006. "Tests of Conditional Predictive Ability," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(6), pages 1545-1578, November.
    3. Diks, Cees & Panchenko, Valentyn & van Dijk, Dick, 2010. "Out-of-sample comparison of copula specifications in multivariate density forecasts," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1596-1609, September.
    4. Felício Cassalho & Samuel Beskow & Carlos Rogério Mello & Maíra Martim Moura & Laura Kerstner & Leo Fernandes Ávila, 2018. "At-Site Flood Frequency Analysis Coupled with Multiparameter Probability Distributions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 285-300, January.
    5. Schwert, G William, 2002. "Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 5-17, January.
    6. Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-144, January.
    7. Touré, Siaka, 2005. "Investigations on the Eigen‐coordinates method for the 2‐parameter weibull distribution of wind speed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 511-521.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Haoling & Zhao, Tongtiegang, 2020. "Modeling power loss during blackouts in China using non-stationary generalized extreme value distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Andrea Gioia & Maria Francesca Bruno & Vincenzo Totaro & Vito Iacobellis, 2020. "Parametric Assessment of Trend Test Power in a Changing Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Longxia Qian & Yong Zhao & Jianhong Yang & Hanlin Li & Hongrui Wang & ChengZu Bai, 2022. "A New Estimation Method for Copula Parameters for Multivariate Hydrological Frequency Analysis With Small Sample Sizes," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(4), pages 1141-1157, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2024. "How to Compare Copula Forecasts?," Papers 2410.04165, arXiv.org.
    2. Diaa Noureldin & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard, 2012. "Multivariate high‐frequency‐based volatility (HEAVY) models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 907-933, September.
    3. Gregor Bäurle & Elizabeth Steiner & Gabriel Züllig, 2021. "Forecasting the production side of GDP," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 458-480, April.
    4. Krenar AVDULAJ & Jozef BARUNIK, 2013. "Can We Still Benefit from International Diversification? The Case of the Czech and German Stock Markets," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 63(5), pages 425-442, November.
    5. Avdulaj, Krenar & Barunik, Jozef, 2015. "Are benefits from oil–stocks diversification gone? New evidence from a dynamic copula and high frequency data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 31-44.
    6. Daniel Borup & Jonas N. Eriksen & Mads M. Kjær & Martin Thyrsgaard, 2024. "Predicting Bond Return Predictability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 931-951, February.
    7. Wilmer Osvaldo Martínez-Rivera & Manuel Dario Hernández-Bejarano & Juan Manuel Julio-Román, 2014. "On Forecast Evaluation," Borradores de Economia 825, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    8. Diks, Cees & Panchenko, Valentyn & Sokolinskiy, Oleg & van Dijk, Dick, 2014. "Comparing the accuracy of multivariate density forecasts in selected regions of the copula support," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 79-94.
    9. Diks, Cees & Fang, Hao, 2020. "Comparing density forecasts in a risk management context," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 531-551.
    10. Kruse, Robinson & Leschinski, Christian & Will, Michael, 2016. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy under Long Memory - With an Application to Volatility Forecasting," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-571, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    11. Cees Diks & Valentyn Panchenko & Oleg Sokolinskiy, & Dick van Dijk, 2013. "Comparing the Accuracy of Copula-Based Multivariate Density Forecasts in Selected Regions of Support," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-061/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Nathan Goldstein & Ben‐Zion Zilberfarb, 2023. "The closer we get, the better we are?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(2), pages 364-376, April.
    13. Liu, Xiaochun, 2015. "Modeling time-varying skewness via decomposition for out-of-sample forecast," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 296-311.
    14. Akgun, Oguzhan & Pirotte, Alain & Urga, Giovanni & Yang, Zhenlin, 2024. "Equal predictive ability tests based on panel data with applications to OECD and IMF forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 202-228.
    15. Daniel Borup & Martin Thyrsgaard, 2017. "Statistical tests for equal predictive ability across multiple forecasting methods," CREATES Research Papers 2017-19, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    16. Alexander, Carol & Han, Yang & Meng, Xiaochun, 2023. "Static and dynamic models for multivariate distribution forecasts: Proper scoring rule tests of factor-quantile versus multivariate GARCH models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1078-1096.
    17. João C. Claudio & Katja Heinisch & Oliver Holtemöller, 2020. "Nowcasting East German GDP growth: a MIDAS approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 29-54, January.
    18. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard, 2009. "Nuisance parameters, composite likelihoods and a panel of GARCH models," Economics Papers 2009-W12, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    19. Xilong Chen & Eric Ghysels, 2011. "News--Good or Bad--and Its Impact on Volatility Predictions over Multiple Horizons," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 46-81, October.
    20. Chen, Qitong & Hong, Yongmiao & Li, Haiqi, 2024. "Time-varying forecast combination for factor-augmented regressions with smooth structural changes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:724-737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.