IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v133y2017icp99-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimates of GHG emissions by hydroelectric reservoirs: The Brazilian case

Author

Listed:
  • dos Santos, Marco Aurélio
  • Damázio, Jorge Machado
  • Rogério, Josiclea Pereira
  • Amorim, Marcelo Andrade
  • Medeiros, Alexandre Mollica
  • Abreu, Juliano Lucas Souza
  • Maceira, Maria Elvira Pineiro
  • Melo, Albert Cordeiro
  • Rosa, Luiz Pinguelli

Abstract

This article reports and discusses the application of an analysis of reservoir greenhouse gas (GHG) emission using the net emission approach (difference between post-impoundment and pre-impoundment emissions) to assessments of GHG emissions from hydropower reservoirs compared with GHG emissions from thermal plants producing electrical energy. Reservoirs were chosen from a representative set of different Brazilian biomes and climatic regimes. A field campaign program was performed between 2011 and 2013 to estimate net GHGs emissions from 8 Brazilian representative hydropower plants. Four field campaigns to each hydropower plant were scheduled within two-month intervals to measure CH4, CO2 and N2O diffusive fluxes on air-water interfaces (reservoir surface area and downstream river, CH4 and CO2 ebullitive fluxes on the air-water interfaces of the reservoir and degassing rates at powerhouse turbines). Permanent carbon burial rates were also measured in the reservoirs. Statistical analyses of the data were representative of post-impoundment annual values for GHG emissions for each pathway and for permanent carbon burial rates. Values for pre-impoundment representative annual GHG emission were calculated taking into account previous land cover mapping data from the period of the creation of the reservoir, and reference GHG flux values established by the literature for each land cover class. To compare with thermopower generation, annual values obtained were expressed as GHG intensity in g of CO2eq.kWh−1 considering a Global Warming Potential value for 100 years; the factor 44/12 was considered as the permanent carbon burial rate necessary to transform carbon into carbon dioxide; and production of plant firm energy was also considered. Annual net GHG emissions estimates were expressed as GHG intensity in g of CO2eq kWh−1.

Suggested Citation

  • dos Santos, Marco Aurélio & Damázio, Jorge Machado & Rogério, Josiclea Pereira & Amorim, Marcelo Andrade & Medeiros, Alexandre Mollica & Abreu, Juliano Lucas Souza & Maceira, Maria Elvira Pineiro & Me, 2017. "Estimates of GHG emissions by hydroelectric reservoirs: The Brazilian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 99-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:133:y:2017:i:c:p:99-107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217308393
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raupp, I. & Costa, F., 2021. "Hydropower expansion planning in Brazil - Environmental improvements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Cartelle Barros, Juan José & Lara Coira, Manuel & de la Cruz López, María Pilar & del Caño Gochi, Alfredo & Soares, Isabel, 2020. "Probabilistic multicriteria environmental assessment of power plants: A global approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:133:y:2017:i:c:p:99-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.