IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v111y2016icp126-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparatively study between single-phase and two-phase modes of energy extraction in a salinity-gradient solar pond power plant

Author

Listed:
  • Ziapour, Behrooz M.
  • Shokrnia, Mehdi
  • Naseri, Mohammad

Abstract

The common process in all applications of a salinity-gradient solar pond (SGSP) is the energy extraction process using single-phase mode heat transfer with some limitations such as pumping the large amount of mass flow rate, and need for big size of heat exchanger. In every respect, two-phase mode heat transfer can be selected as an advantage due to its passive case of operation and comparatively high heat transfer capacity with rational system size. In this paper, an enhanced design of a large scale SGSP power plant using some two-phase closed thermosyphons has been simulated and compared with the single-phase mode heat transfer. The simulation results showed that the overall thermal efficiency of the solar pond power plant was the highest using both thermosyphons and heat exchangers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziapour, Behrooz M. & Shokrnia, Mehdi & Naseri, Mohammad, 2016. "Comparatively study between single-phase and two-phase modes of energy extraction in a salinity-gradient solar pond power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 126-136.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:126-136
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216307423
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cho, Soo-Yong & Cho, Chong-Hyun & Ahn, Kook-Young & Lee, Young Duk, 2014. "A study of the optimal operating conditions in the organic Rankine cycle using a turbo-expander for fluctuations of the available thermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 900-911.
    2. Quoilin, Sylvain & Lemort, Vincent & Lebrun, Jean, 2010. "Experimental study and modeling of an Organic Rankine Cycle using scroll expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1260-1268, April.
    3. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    4. Ziapour, B.M., 2009. "Performance analysis of an enhanced thermosyphon Rankine cycle using impulse turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1636-1641.
    5. Clemente, Stefano & Micheli, Diego & Reini, Mauro & Taccani, Rodolfo, 2012. "Energy efficiency analysis of Organic Rankine Cycles with scroll expanders for cogenerative applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 792-801.
    6. Velmurugan, V. & Srithar, K., 2008. "Prospects and scopes of solar pond: A detailed review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(8), pages 2253-2263, October.
    7. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    8. El-Sebaii, A.A. & Ramadan, M.R.I. & Aboul-Enein, S. & Khallaf, A.M., 2011. "History of the solar ponds: A review study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 3319-3325, August.
    9. Sureshkumar, R. & Mohideen, S. Tharves & Nethaji, N., 2013. "Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids in heat pipes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 397-410.
    10. Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    12. Tsilingiris, P.T., 1991. "Large scale solar cooling design using salt gradient solar ponds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 309-314.
    13. Ranjan, K.R. & Kaushik, S.C., 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic feasibility of solar ponds for various thermal applications: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 123-139.
    14. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loni, Reyhaneh & Mahian, Omid & Markides, Christos N. & Bellos, Evangelos & le Roux, Willem G. & Kasaeian, Ailbakhsh & Najafi, Gholamhassan & Rajaee, Fatemeh, 2021. "A review of solar-driven organic Rankine cycles: Recent challenges and future outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Al-Nimr, Moh'd A. & Dawahdeh, Ahmad I. & Ali, Hussain A., 2022. "Power generation by integrating a thermally regenerative electrochemical cycle (TREC) with a solar pond and underground heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 663-675.
    3. Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Nourani, Pejman, 2019. "Investigating potential benefits of a salinity gradient solar pond for ejector refrigeration cycle coupled with a thermoelectric generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 675-690.
    4. Feng Zhen & Yuwan Pang & Tao Xing & Hongqiong Zhang & Yonghua Xu & Wenzhe Li & Yong Sun, 2022. "Effect of Phase Change Materials and Phase Change Temperature on Optimization of Design Parameters of Anaerobic Reactor Thermal Insulation Structure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Ghaebi, Hadi & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "Performance comparison of two new cogeneration systems for freshwater and power production based on organic Rankine and Kalina cycles driven by salinity-gradient solar pond," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 748-767.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ziviani, Davide & Beyene, Asfaw & Venturini, Mauro, 2014. "Advances and challenges in ORC systems modeling for low grade thermal energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 79-95.
    2. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Karvountzis-Kontakiotis & Apostolos Pesyridis & Muhammad Usman, 2018. "Expander Technologies for Automotive Engine Organic Rankine Cycle Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-36, July.
    3. Yu-Ting Wu & Biao Lei & Chong-Fang Ma & Lei Zhao & Jing-Fu Wang & Hang Guo & Yuan-Wei Lu, 2014. "Study on the Characteristics of Expander Power Output Used for Offsetting Pumping Work Consumption in Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    5. Lei, Biao & Wang, Wei & Wu, Yu-Ting & Ma, Chong-Fang & Wang, Jing-Fu & Zhang, Lei & Li, Chuang & Zhao, Ying-Kun & Zhi, Rui-Ping, 2016. "Development and experimental study on a single screw expander integrated into an Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 43-52.
    6. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    7. Lei, Biao & Wu, Yu-Ting & Wang, Wei & Wang, Jing-Fu & Ma, Chong-Fang, 2014. "A study on lubricant oil supply for positive-displacement expanders in small-scale organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 846-853.
    8. Imran, Muhammad & Usman, Muhammad & Park, Byung-Sik & Lee, Dong-Hyun, 2016. "Volumetric expanders for low grade heat and waste heat recovery applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1090-1109.
    9. Peris, Bernardo & Navarro-Esbrí, Joaquín & Molés, Francisco & Mota-Babiloni, Adrián, 2015. "Experimental study of an ORC (organic Rankine cycle) for low grade waste heat recovery in a ceramic industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 534-542.
    10. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    11. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    12. White, Martin & Sayma, Abdulnaser I., 2016. "Improving the economy-of-scale of small organic rankine cycle systems through appropriate working fluid selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1227-1239.
    13. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    14. Cho, Soo-Yong & Cho, Chong-Hyun, 2015. "An experimental study on the organic Rankine cycle to determine as to how efficiently utilize fluctuating thermal energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 73-79.
    15. Cho, Soo-Yong & Cho, Chong-Hyun & Choi, Sang-Kyu, 2015. "Experiment and cycle analysis on a partially admitted axial-type turbine used in the organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 643-651.
    16. Giuffrida, Antonio, 2017. "Improving the semi-empirical modelling of a single-screw expander for small organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 356-368.
    17. Francesco Calise & Davide Capuano & Laura Vanoli, 2015. "Dynamic Simulation and Exergo-Economic Optimization of a Hybrid Solar–Geothermal Cogeneration Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-41, April.
    18. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Kaindl, Johannes & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 946-963.
    19. Shao, Long & Ma, Xinling & Wei, Xinli & Hou, Zhonglan & Meng, Xiangrui, 2017. "Design and experimental study of a small-sized organic Rankine cycle system under various cooling conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 236-245.
    20. Xu, Bin & Rathod, Dhruvang & Yebi, Adamu & Filipi, Zoran & Onori, Simona & Hoffman, Mark, 2019. "A comprehensive review of organic rankine cycle waste heat recovery systems in heavy-duty diesel engine applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:126-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.