IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v44y2012icp235-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation in three selected communities of northwestern Ontario, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Upadhyay, Thakur Prasad
  • Shahi, Chander
  • Leitch, Mathew
  • Pulkki, Reino

Abstract

Biomass gasification is expected to be an attractive option among other competitive applications of biomass conversion for bio-energy. This study analyzes economic feasibility of biomass gasification power generating plants in three selected communities (Ignace, Nipigon and Kenora) of northwestern Ontario. The major variables considered in the model are harvesting and handling costs, logistic costs for biomass feedstock delivery and storage, capital costs of power plant by scales, operation and maintenance costs, labor costs, capital financing costs and other regulatory costs. GIS analysis was undertaken to estimate the distance class matrix to apportion the biomass feedstock supply side from different forest management units. Total cost per MWh power production at a 50MW scale ranges from CAD 61.89 to CAD 63.79. Total cost per unit of electricity production decreases significantly as plant capacity increases due to economy of scale in the production system. Further, the locations of plants explained the cost variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Upadhyay, Thakur Prasad & Shahi, Chander & Leitch, Mathew & Pulkki, Reino, 2012. "Economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation in three selected communities of northwestern Ontario, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 235-244.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:44:y:2012:i:c:p:235-244
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512000730
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Amit & Flynn, Peter & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2008. "Biopower generation from mountain pine infested wood in Canada: An economical opportunity for greenhouse gas mitigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1354-1363.
    2. Berndes, Goran & Hansson, Julia, 2007. "Bioenergy expansion in the EU: Cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5965-5979, December.
    3. Klimantos, P. & Koukouzas, N. & Katsiadakis, A. & Kakaras, E., 2009. "Air-blown biomass gasification combined cycles (BGCC): System analysis and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 708-714.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi, Yi & Huang, Yidan & Xu, Jiuping, 2024. "A clean optimization approach for sustainable waste-to-energy using integrated technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Okkonen, Lasse & Lehtonen, Olli, 2017. "Local, regional and national level of the socioeconomic impacts of a bio-oil production system – A case in Lieksa, Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 103-111.
    3. Shafie, S.M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H. & Ahmad-Yazid, A., 2012. "A review on electricity generation based on biomass residue in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5879-5889.
    4. Blair, M. Jean & Mabee, Warren E., 2020. "Evaluation of technology, economics and emissions impacts of community-scale bioenergy systems for a forest-based community in Ontario," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 715-730.
    5. Amro M. Elshurafa & Mohammad H. Aldubyan, 2019. "State-of-Charge Effects on Standalone Solar-Storage Systems in Hot Climates: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2014. "Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives – A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-73.
    7. Cambero, Claudia & Hans Alexandre, Mariane & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2015. "Life cycle greenhouse gas analysis of bioenergy generation alternatives using forest and wood residues in remote locations: A case study in British Columbia, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 59-72.
    8. Sajid, Muhammad & Raheem, Abdul & Ullah, Naeem & Asim, Muhammad & Ur Rehman, Muhammad Saif & Ali, Nisar, 2022. "Gasification of municipal solid waste: Progress, challenges, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Shafie, S.M., 2016. "A review on paddy residue based power generation: Energy, environment and economic perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1089-1100.
    10. Shi, Yi & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "A multi-objective approach to kitchen waste and excess sludge co-digestion for biomethane production with anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    11. Fioranelli, Anselmo & Bizzo, Waldir A., 2023. "Generation of surplus electricity in sugarcane mills from sugarcane bagasse and straw: Challenges, failures and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. M. Jean Blair & Bruno Gagnon & Andrew Klain & Biljana Kulišić, 2021. "Contribution of Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy to Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lechón, Y. & de la Rúa, C. & Rodríguez, I. & Caldés, N., 2019. "Socioeconomic implications of biofuels deployment through an Input-Output approach. A case study in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 178-191.
    2. Batidzirai, B. & Smeets, E.M.W. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Harmonising bioenergy resource potentials—Methodological lessons from review of state of the art bioenergy potential assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6598-6630.
    3. Athari, Hassan & Soltani, Saeed & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A. & Morosuk, Tatiana, 2014. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass post-firing combined-cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 553-561.
    4. Mobini, Mahdi & Sowlati, Taraneh & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2011. "Forest biomass supply logistics for a power plant using the discrete-event simulation approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1241-1250, April.
    5. Bentsen, Niclas Scott & Jack, Michael W. & Felby, Claus & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2014. "Allocation of biomass resources for minimising energy system greenhouse gas emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 506-515.
    6. G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2013. "Economic analysis of feed-in tariffs for generating electricity from renewable energy sources," Chapters, in: Roger Fouquet (ed.), Handbook on Energy and Climate Change, chapter 9, pages 224-253, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    8. Viccaro, Mauro & Rocchi, Benedetto & Cozzi, Mario & Egging, Rudolf G. & Perez-Valdes, Gerardo A. & Romano, Severino, 2017. "Promoting the Bioelectricity Sector at the Regional Level: an Impact Analysis of Energy Tax Policy," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261158, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Pätäri, Satu & Kyläheiko, Kalevi & Sandström, Jaana, 2011. "Opening up new strategic options in the pulp and paper industry: Case biorefineries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 456-464, July.
    10. Vamvuka, D. & Pitharoulis, M. & Alevizos, G. & Repouskou, E. & Pentari, D., 2009. "Ash effects during combustion of lignite/biomass blends in fluidized bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2662-2671.
    11. Martinsen, Dag & Funk, Carolin & Linssen, Jochen, 2010. "Biomass for transportation fuels--A cost-effective option for the German energy supply?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 128-140, January.
    12. Papa Stefano, 2008. "Il sistema internazionale delle emissioni, gli strumenti di flessibilità e le forme di incentivazione in Italia," wp.comunite 0046, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    13. Dries Haeseldonckx & William D’haeseleer, 2010. "Hydrogen from Renewables," Chapters, in: François Lévêque & Jean-Michel Glachant & Julián Barquín & Christian von Hirschhausen & Franziska Ho (ed.), Security of Energy Supply in Europe, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Ma, Zhongqing & Zhang, Yimeng & Zhang, Qisheng & Qu, Yongbiao & Zhou, Jianbin & Qin, Hengfei, 2012. "Design and experimental investigation of a 190 kWe biomass fixed bed gasification and polygeneration pilot plant using a double air stage downdraft approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 140-147.
    15. Jeong, Dawoon & Tyner, Wallace E. & Meilan, Richard & Brown, Tristan R. & Doering, Otto C., 2020. "Stochastic techno-economic analysis of electricity produced from poplar plantations in Indiana," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 189-197.
    16. Qu, Mei & Lin, Ying & Liu, Can & Yao, Shunbo & Cao, Yang, 2016. "Farmers׳ perceptions of developing forest based bioenergy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 581-589.
    17. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    18. Wang, Jiangjiang & Mao, Tianzhi & Wu, Jing, 2017. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling and analysis of combined cooling heating and power system integrated with biomass-steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 871-882.
    19. Tim Bogle & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2011. "What Makes Mountain Pine Beetle a Tricky Pest? Difficult Decisions when Facing Beetle Attack in a Mixed Species Forest," Working Papers 2011-07, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    20. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Schmid, Erwin, 2011. "Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3261-3280, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:44:y:2012:i:c:p:235-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.