IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v43y2012icp145-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing the national nuclear legacy at the local level: Implications for the future of federal facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Morrone, Michele
  • Basta, Tania B.
  • Somerville, Jennifer

Abstract

There are several major federal nuclear facilities located in small towns and rural areas of the United States. While many of these facilities were developed in the 1950s to support national defense, in the 1960s and 1970s, some of these shifted their mission to focus on national energy infrastructure. Now, many of these facilities are in a clean-up phase, and local communities are becoming increasingly engaged in influencing decisions about the future of the sites. Communicating with the public in rural communities is challenging when it involves a complicated environmental issue that could have widespread economic impacts. The local media reflect public understanding, so getting a sense of how these media frame issues can be a crucial first step to developing an effective community engagement strategy. A media content analysis of one local newspaper was completed in relation to a major federal nuclear facility. The content analysis is compared to the results of a telephone survey in the region served by the paper and the results suggest that there is a relationship between how the facility is portrayed in local media and public concern. This study has important implications for other nuclear facilities because of the role of local citizens in decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Morrone, Michele & Basta, Tania B. & Somerville, Jennifer, 2012. "Framing the national nuclear legacy at the local level: Implications for the future of federal facilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 145-152.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:43:y:2012:i:c:p:145-152
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511010482
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenberg, Michael & Truelove, Heather, 2010. "Right answers and right-wrong answers: Sources of information influencing knowledge of nuclear-related information," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 130-140, September.
    2. Lund, P.D., 2010. "Fast market penetration of energy technologies in retrospect with application to clean energy futures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3575-3583, November.
    3. Michael Greenberg, 2009. "How much do people who live near major nuclear facilities worry about those facilities? Analysis of national and site-specific data," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 919-937.
    4. William C. Metz, 1994. "Potential Negative Impacts of Nuclear Activities on Local Economies: Rethinking the Issue," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(5), pages 763-770, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nachatter Singh Garha & Ricardo Garcia Mira & Fernando González-Laxe, 2022. "Energy Transition Narratives in Spain: A Case Study of As Pontes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Michele Morrone & Tania B. Basta, 2013. "Public opinion, local pollution havens, and environmental justice: a case study of a community visioning project in Appalachian Ohio," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 350-363, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frantál, Bohumil & Malý, Jiří, 2017. "Close or renew? Factors affecting local community support for rebuilding nuclear power plants in the Czech Republic," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 134-143.
    2. Felix Richter & Malte Steenbeck & Markus Wilhelm, 2013. "Nuclear Accidents and Policy: Notes on Public Perception," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 590, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    3. Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "The history and politics of energy transitions: Comparing contested views and finding common ground," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-81, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. William C. Metz, 1996. "Historical Application of a Social Amplification of Risk Model: Economic Impacts of Risk Events at Nuclear Weapons Facilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 185-193, April.
    5. Albino, Vito & Ardito, Lorenzo & Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2014. "Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 836-854.
    6. Robert Olszewski & Piotr Pałka & Agnieszka Wendland & Jacek Kamiński, 2019. "A Multi-Agent Social Gamification Model to Guide Sustainable Urban Photovoltaic Panels Installation Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Sawhney, Rapinder & Thakur, Kaveri & Venkatesan, Bharadwaj & Ji, Shuguang & Upreti, Girish & Sanseverino, John, 2014. "Empirical analysis of the solar incentive policy for Tennessee solar value chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 368-376.
    8. Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "The history and politics of energy transitions: Comparing contested views and finding common ground," WIDER Working Paper Series 081, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Ando, Michihito, 2013. "Estimating the effects of nuclear power facilities on local income levels: A quasi-experimental approach," Working Paper Series 2013:3, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    10. Sinha, Avik, 2017. "Inequality of renewable energy generation across OECD countries: A note," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 9-14.
    11. Lund, Peter D., 2014. "How fast can businesses in the new energy sector grow? An analysis of critical factors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 33-40.
    12. William C. Metz & David E. Clark, 1997. "The Effect of Decisions About Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage on Residential Property Values," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(5), pages 571-582, October.
    13. Aguilera, Roberto F. & Ripple, Ronald D., 2013. "Modeling primary energy substitution in the Asia Pacific," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 219-224.
    14. Adolfo Maza & José Villaverde & María Hierro, 2015. "Non- $$\hbox {CO}_2$$ CO 2 Generating Energy Shares in the World: Cross-Country Differences and Polarization," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(3), pages 319-343, July.
    15. Dincer, Ibrahim & Acar, Canan, 2017. "Smart energy systems for a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 225-235.
    16. Niemi, R. & Mikkola, J. & Lund, P.D., 2012. "Urban energy systems with smart multi-carrier energy networks and renewable energy generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 524-536.
    17. Michael R. Greenberg & Marc D. Weiner, 2014. "Keeping Surveys Valid, Reliable, and Useful: A Tutorial," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(8), pages 1362-1375, August.
    18. He, Guizhen & Mol, Arthur P.J. & Zhang, Lei & Lu, Yonglong, 2013. "Public participation and trust in nuclear power development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Sjöberg, Lennart, 2002. "Perceived information technology risks and attitudes," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2002:5, Stockholm School of Economics.
    20. Michael Greenberg & Heather Barnes Truelove, 2011. "Energy Choices and Risk Beliefs: Is It Just Global Warming and Fear of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 819-831, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:43:y:2012:i:c:p:145-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.