IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v184y2024ics0301421523004950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enabling coordination in energy communities: A Digital Twin model

Author

Listed:
  • Bâra, Adela
  • Oprea, Simona-Vasilica

Abstract

Starting from the EU vision for Energy Communities (EC), our purpose is to support them by proposing a Digital Twin (DT) that includes a bi-level optimization model to deliver coordination, economic, social, and environmental benefits to its members that can be quantified as Key Performance Indicators (KPI). The diversity of EC members from the size and interest perspectives leads us to consider a bi-level optimization model. It offers support to individual consumers/prosumers (first level) and coordination for EC (second level). This model is embedded into a DT that replicates the EC and the operation of individual entities such as consumers/prosumers and public assets. The DT is created as an automatic assistant with two components: iEMS – as a member's assistant and eEMS – as an EC assistant. These components optimize the schedule, generate bids for the Local Electricity Market (LEM) and control the flexible appliances of the participants to deal with deficits and surpluses. The DT receives input from EC members, LEM, metering system and improves the operation of the EC in a two-way continuous exchange data flow. Furthermore, it is a reliable framework to test and improve models, regulations and policies in emergent EC as DT provides alternatives regarding its functionalities: optimization, market operation, setting the clearing price, settlement, value sharing for distributing benefits, etc. It can be extended to support grid operators to design tariffs, testing regulation and offer additional energy services. The proposed DT model is tested within an EC case study, both on a seasonal and an annual basis. The average trading index on LEM is 0.6 during the summer and 0.3 during the winter months, while the Degree of Local Sufficiency (DLS) for the EC is 0.45 in summer and 0.28 in winter. Moreover, the proposed LFM model reduces the exchanges with the main grid by an average of 45 kW in summer, that represents almost 15% of the average exchange at peak hours.

Suggested Citation

  • Bâra, Adela & Oprea, Simona-Vasilica, 2024. "Enabling coordination in energy communities: A Digital Twin model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523004950
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523004950
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Wei & Patros, Panos & Young, Brent & Klinac, Elsa & Walmsley, Timothy Gordon, 2022. "Energy digital twin technology for industrial energy management: Classification, challenges and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Ibrahim Abada, Andreas Ehrenmann, and Xavier Lambin, 2020. "On the Viability of Energy Communities," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    3. Vernay, Anne-Lorène & Sebi, Carine, 2020. "Energy communities and their ecosystems: A comparison of France and the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Di Silvestre, Maria Luisa & Ippolito, Mariano Giuseppe & Sanseverino, Eleonora Riva & Sciumè, Giuseppe & Vasile, Antony, 2021. "Energy self-consumers and renewable energy communities in Italy: New actors of the electric power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Joanna Henzel & Łukasz Wróbel & Marcin Fice & Marek Sikora, 2022. "Energy Consumption Forecasting for the Digital-Twin Model of the Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Lv, Zhihan & Cheng, Chen & Lv, Haibin, 2023. "Digital twins for secure thermal energy storage in building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    7. Gjorgievski, Vladimir Z. & Cundeva, Snezana & Georghiou, George E., 2021. "Social arrangements, technical designs and impacts of energy communities: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1138-1156.
    8. Heldeweg, Michiel A. & Séverine Saintier,, 2020. "Renewable energy communities as ‘socio-legal institutions’: A normative frame for energy decentralization?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Agustín Zaballos & Alan Briones & Alba Massa & Pol Centelles & Víctor Caballero, 2020. "A Smart Campus’ Digital Twin for Sustainable Comfort Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, November.
    10. Anne-Lorene Vernay & Carine Sebi, 2020. "Energy communities and their ecosystems A comparison of France and the Netherlands," Post-Print hal-02987790, HAL.
    11. Qin, Jun & Jiang, Hou & Lu, Ning & Yao, Ling & Zhou, Chenghu, 2022. "Enhancing solar PV output forecast by integrating ground and satellite observations with deep learning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Boulogiorgou, D. & Ktenidis, P., 2020. "TILOS local scale Technology Innovation enabling low carbon energy transition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 397-403.
    13. Oprea, Simona-Vasilica & Bâra, Adela, 2021. "Devising a trading mechanism with a joint price adjustment for local electricity markets using blockchain. Insights for policy makers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Siddharth Sareen & Douglas Baillie & Jürgen Kleinwächter, 2018. "Transitions to Future Energy Systems: Learning from a Community Test Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, November.
    15. You, Minglei & Wang, Qian & Sun, Hongjian & Castro, Iván & Jiang, Jing, 2022. "Digital twins based day-ahead integrated energy system scheduling under load and renewable energy uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    16. Roby, Helen & Dibb, Sally, 2019. "Future pathways to mainstreaming community energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Spinti, Jennifer P. & Smith, Philip J. & Smith, Sean T., 2022. "Atikokan Digital Twin: Machine learning in a biomass energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    18. Gährs, Swantje & Knoefel, Jan, 2020. "Stakeholder demands and regulatory framework for community energy storage with a focus on Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Özgür Yildiz & Boris Gotchev & Lars Holstenkamp & Jakob R. Müller & Jörg Radtke & Laura Welle, 2019. "Consumer (Co-)Ownership in Renewables in Germany," Springer Books, in: Jens Lowitzsch (ed.), Energy Transition, chapter 13, pages 271-293, Springer.
    20. Lüth, Alexandra & Zepter, Jan Martin & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging, Ruud, 2018. "Local electricity market designs for peer-to-peer trading: The role of battery flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1233-1243.
    21. Abada, Ibrahim & Ehrenmann, Andreas & Lambin, Xavier, 2020. "Unintended consequences: The snowball effect of energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    22. Brummer, Vasco, 2018. "Community energy – benefits and barriers: A comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 187-196.
    23. Rafaela Bortolini & Raul Rodrigues & Hamidreza Alavi & Luisa Felix Dalla Vecchia & Núria Forcada, 2022. "Digital Twins’ Applications for Building Energy Efficiency: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ning, Jiajun & Xiong, Lixin, 2024. "Analysis of the dynamic evolution process of the digital transformation of renewable energy enterprises based on the cooperative and evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Fioriti, Davide & Frangioni, Antonio & Poli, Davide, 2021. "Optimal sizing of energy communities with fair revenue sharing and exit clauses: Value, role and business model of aggregators and users," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    3. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu & Siyami Alp Limoncuoglu & Muhittin Hakan Demir & Johannes Reichl & Katrin Burgstaller & Alessandro Sciullo & Edoardo Ferrero, 2021. "Legal Provisions and Market Conditions for Energy Communities in Austria, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Turkey: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Neska, Ewa & Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna, 2022. "Conceptual design of energy market topologies for communities and their practical applications in EU: A comparison of three case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Vernay, Anne-Lorène & Olsthoorn, Mark & Sebi, Carine & Gauthier, Caroline, 2023. "The identity trap of community renewable energy in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Gjorgievski, Vladimir Z. & Cundeva, Snezana & Georghiou, George E., 2021. "Social arrangements, technical designs and impacts of energy communities: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1138-1156.
    7. Vernay, Anne-Lorène & Sebi, Carine & Arroyo, Fabrice, 2023. "Energy community business models and their impact on the energy transition: Lessons learnt from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Kemi Adeyeye & John Gallagher & Aonghus McNabola & Helena M. Ramos & Paul Coughlan, 2021. "Socio-Technical Viability Framework for Micro Hydropower in Group Water-Energy Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    9. do Amaral, J.V.S. & dos Santos, C.H. & Montevechi, J.A.B. & de Queiroz, A.R., 2023. "Energy Digital Twin applications: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Wainer, A. & Petrovics, D. & van der Grijp, N., 2022. "The grid access of energy communities a comparison of power grid governance in France and Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Heilmann, Jakob & Wensaas, Marthe & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hashemipour, Naser, 2022. "Trading algorithms to represent the wholesale market of energy communities in Norway and England," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1426-1437.
    12. Viktor Bukovszki & Ábel Magyari & Marina Kristina Braun & Kitti Párdi & András Reith, 2020. "Energy Modelling as a Trigger for Energy Communities: A Joint Socio-Technical Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-44, May.
    13. Maria Alessandra Ancona & Francesco Baldi & Lisa Branchini & Andrea De Pascale & Federico Gianaroli & Francesco Melino & Mattia Ricci, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy Community Designs for District Heating Networks: Case Study of Corticella (Italy)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Sima, Catalina Alexandra & Popescu, Claudia Laurenta & Popescu, Mihai Octavian & Roscia, Mariacristina & Seritan, George & Panait, Cornel, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of university energy communities with on/off microgrid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 538-553.
    15. Pariman Boostani & Giuseppe Pellegrini-Masini & Jørgen Klein, 2024. "The Role of Community Energy Schemes in Reducing Energy Poverty and Promoting Social Inclusion: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, July.
    16. Nuñez-Jimenez, Alejandro & Mehta, Prakhar & Griego, Danielle, 2023. "Let it grow: How community solar policy can increase PV adoption in cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim, 2024. "Empirical insights into enabling and impeding factors for increasing citizen investments in renewable energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Cortade, Thomas & Poudou, Jean-Christophe, 2022. "Peer-to-peer energy platforms: Incentives for prosuming," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Radtke, Jörg & Bohn, Nino S., 2023. "Mind the gap: Community member perceptions of shortcomings in diversity and inclusivity of local energy projects in Germany," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Kubli, Merla & Puranik, Sanket, 2023. "A typology of business models for energy communities: Current and emerging design options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523004950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.