IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v181y2023ics0301421523003038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unintended mitigation benefits of China's coal de-capacity policies on methane emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Jinling
  • Gao, Junlian
  • Yan, Kejia
  • Zhang, Bo

Abstract

Coal de-capacity policies are often used to promote the integration of coal resources and optimize the production structure in China. This study used a bottom-up approach to evaluate the unintended effect of China's coal de-capacity policies on methane emissions mitigation from 2011 to 2019. Under the effect of such policies, the closed coal capacity was 46% of the total coal capacity in 2011. A total of 9567 coal mines with 1610 Mt of capacity were closed. The capacity of low CH4-content coal mines accounted for 77% in 2019, and the capacity of high and outburst CH4-content coal mines decreased by 9% compared to 2011. The adjustment in coal production structure in turn affects coal mine methane emission intensity, hence the national average coal mine emission factor decreased from 9 m3/t in 2011 to 8 m3/t in 2019. The coal de-capacity policies generated a cumulative 10.70 Tg of methane emissions mitigation from 2011 to 2019, even with rebounded coal production. As the number of coal mine closures continues to increase, the priority phase-out of high and outburst CH4-content mines will further lead to greater methane mitigation. In the future, more attention should be paid to methane emissions from abandoned mines.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Jinling & Gao, Junlian & Yan, Kejia & Zhang, Bo, 2023. "Unintended mitigation benefits of China's coal de-capacity policies on methane emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:181:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523003038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Delu & Wan, Kaidi & Song, Xuefeng & Liu, Yun, 2019. "Provincial allocation of coal de-capacity targets in China in terms of cost, efficiency, and fairness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 109-128.
    2. Wang, Xiaofei & Miao, Chenglin & Wang, Chongmei & Yin, Dawei & Chen, Shaojie & Chen, Lei & Li, Ke, 2022. "Coal production capacity allocation based on efficiency perspective—taking production mines in Shandong Province as an example," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Wang, Xiaofei & Liu, Chuangeng & Chen, Shaojie & Chen, Lei & Li, Ke & Liu, Na, 2020. "Impact of coal sector’s de-capacity policy on coal price," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Anyu Zhu & Qifei Wang & Dongqiao Liu & Yihan Zhao, 2022. "Analysis of the Characteristics of CH 4 Emissions in China’s Coal Mining Industry and Research on Emission Reduction Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Wang, Peng & Yang, Muyi & Mamaril, Kristy & Shi, Xunpeng & Cheng, Beibei & Zhao, Daiqing, 2021. "Explaining the slow progress of coal phase-out: The case of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Wang, Delu & Wan, Kaidi & Song, Xuefeng, 2018. "Quota allocation of coal overcapacity reduction among provinces in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 170-181.
    7. Li, Xiaoyu & Yao, Xilong, 2020. "Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?--- A simulated study on China's coal capacity cut and carbon tax," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Delu & Shi, Xunpeng, 2022. "Exploring the multidimensional effects of China's coal de-capacity policy: A regression discontinuity design," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Yang, Qing & Hou, Xiaochao & Zhang, Lei, 2018. "Measurement of natural and cyclical excess capacity in China's coal industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 270-278.
    10. Shi, Xunpeng & Rioux, Bertrand & Galkin, Philipp, 2018. "Unintended consequences of China’s coal capacity cut policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 478-486.
    11. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2019. "Forecasting Methane Emissions from Hard Coal Mines Including the Methane Drainage Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Michieka, Nyakundi M. & Graziano, Marcello & Musso, Marta & Fouquet, Roger, 2022. "Energy transitions and labor market patterns in the U.S. coal industry," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 501-514.
    13. Yao, Xilong & Wang, Hualing & Shao, Shuai & Li, Xiaoyu & Guo, Zhi, 2022. "“Booster” or “obstacle”: Can coal capacity cut policies moderate the resource curse effect? Evidence from Shanxi (China)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Yang, Qing & Zhang, Lei & Zou, Shaohui & Zhang, Jinsuo, 2020. "Intertemporal optimization of the coal production capacity in China in terms of uncertain demand, economy, environment, and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei, Haoqiang & Yue, Guiling & Khan, Noor Ullah, 2024. "Uncovering the impact of Fintech, Natural Resources, Green Finance and Green Growth on Environment sustainability in BRICS: An MMQR analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Jiuping & Shu, Kejing & Wang, Fengjuan & Yang, Guocan, 2024. "Bi-level multi-objective distribution strategy integrating the permit trading scheme towards coal production capacity layout optimization: Case study from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Delu & Shi, Xunpeng, 2022. "Exploring the multidimensional effects of China's coal de-capacity policy: A regression discontinuity design," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Wang, Xiaofei & Miao, Chenglin & Wang, Chongmei & Yin, Dawei & Chen, Shaojie & Chen, Lei & Li, Ke, 2022. "Coal production capacity allocation based on efficiency perspective—taking production mines in Shandong Province as an example," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Delu & Shi, Xunpeng, 2021. "Exploring the dilemma of overcapacity governance in China's coal industry: A tripartite evolutionary game model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Zhang, Rui & Qie, Xiaotong & Hu, Yanyong & Chen, Xue, 2022. "Does de-capacity policy promote the efficient and green development of the coal industry? –Based on the evidence of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Wang, Delu & Liu, Yifei & Wang, Yadong & Shi, Xunpeng & Song, Xuefeng, 2020. "Allocation of coal de-capacity quota among provinces in China: A bi-level multi-objective combinatorial optimization approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Xia, Dan & Zhang, Ling, 2022. "Coupling coordination degree between coal production reduction and CO2 emission reduction in coal industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    8. Yang, Qing & Zhang, Lei & Zhang, Jinsuo & Zou, Shaohui, 2021. "System simulation and policy optimization of China's coal production capacity deviation in terms of the economy, environment, and energy security," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Wang, Di & Shen, Ye & Zhao, Yueying & He, Wei & Liu, Xue & Qian, Xiangyan & Lv, Tao, 2020. "Integrated assessment and obstacle factor diagnosis of China's scientific coal production capacity based on the PSR sustainability framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Zhang, Weike & Meng, Jia & Tian, Xiaoli, 2020. "Does de-capacity policy enhance the total factor productivity of China's coal companies? A Regression Discontinuity design," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Yang, Qing & Zhang, Lei & Zou, Shaohui & Zhang, Jinsuo, 2020. "Intertemporal optimization of the coal production capacity in China in terms of uncertain demand, economy, environment, and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Yihao Tian & Lijin Ding & Bin Yang & Feng Peng, 2022. "The Effects of De-Capacity Policy on Steel and Coal Firms’ Profitability: Evidence from China’s Listed Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Zhang, Yanfang & Shi, Xunpeng & Qian, Xiangyan & Chen, Sai & Nie, Rui, 2021. "Macroeconomic effect of energy transition to carbon neutrality: Evidence from China's coal capacity cut policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Xuguang Hao & Mei Song & Yunan Feng & Wen Zhang, 2019. "De-Capacity Policy Effect on China’s Coal Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Liu, Dandan & Wang, Delu, 2022. "Evaluation of the synergy degree of industrial de-capacity policies based on text mining: A case study of China's coal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Wang, Xiaolei & Deng, Renxin & Yang, Yufang, 2023. "The spatiotemporal effect of factor price distortion on capacity utilization in China’s iron and steel industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    17. Liu, Dandan & Wang, Delu & Mao, Jinqi, 2023. "Study on policy synergy strategy of the central government and local governments in the process of coal de-capacity: Based on a two-stage evolutionary game method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Feng Liu & Tao Lv & Yuan Meng & Xiaoran Hou & Jie Xu & Xu Deng, 2022. "Low-Carbon Transition Paths of Coal Power in China’s Provinces under the Context of the Carbon Trading Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Yao, Xilong & Wang, Hualing & Shao, Shuai & Li, Xiaoyu & Guo, Zhi, 2022. "“Booster” or “obstacle”: Can coal capacity cut policies moderate the resource curse effect? Evidence from Shanxi (China)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Wen, Shiyan & Jia, Zhijie, 2022. "The energy, environment and economy impact of coal resource tax, renewable investment, and total factor productivity growth," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:181:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.