IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v159y2021ics0301421521004663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining community solar programs to understand accessibility and investment: Evidence from the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Hirsh Bar Gai, Dor
  • Shittu, Ekundayo
  • Attanasio, Donna
  • Weigelt, Carmen
  • LeBlanc, Saniya
  • Dehghanian, Payman
  • Sklar, Scott

Abstract

This paper examines barriers and drivers to investment in community solar programs in the U.S. The paper addresses two key questions: (i) What barriers and drivers influence community solar adoption, including in low- and middle-income households? (ii) How can the market potential for community solar be further unlocked beyond the group of early adopter utilities and developers? The research team used a three-phased methodology consisting of stakeholder interviews, a survey, and a stakeholder engagement workshop. The main findings of the paper are: First, leading barriers to adoption are the absence of state and federal policies and standards, difficulties in subscribing customers, and lack of education, financial viability and suitable location sites; Second, the major drivers for adoption are enhancing community benefits and resiliency and grid modernization efforts. Improving financial viability is possible through, for example, the use of anchor tenants to mitigate financial risk and improve value-stack and sustainability efforts. To unlock the market potential for community solar programs requires addressing six categories of issues: (i) increasing community solar programs’ generation limits and use of a portfolio approach to development and financing to achieve economies of scale through multiple projects, (ii) community education, project coordination and site selection, (iii) incorporating community solar programs in grid modernization and resiliency efforts, (iv) standardizing community solar programs policies, (v) mitigating interconnection financial burden, and (vi) designing dynamic contracts with anchor tenants that mitigate subscription issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirsh Bar Gai, Dor & Shittu, Ekundayo & Attanasio, Donna & Weigelt, Carmen & LeBlanc, Saniya & Dehghanian, Payman & Sklar, Scott, 2021. "Examining community solar programs to understand accessibility and investment: Evidence from the U.S," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:159:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521004663
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521004663
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shittu, Ekundayo & Kamdem, Bruno G. & Weigelt, Carmen, 2019. "Heterogeneities in energy technological learning: Evidence from the U.S. electricity industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1034-1049.
    2. Chen, Kaihua & Ren, Zhipeng & Mu, Shijun & Sun, Tara Qian & Mu, Rongping, 2020. "Integrating the Delphi survey into scenario planning for China's renewable energy development strategy towards 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Jed J. Cohen & Levan Elbakidze & Randall Jackson, 2020. "Solar Bait: How U.S. States Attract Solar Investments from Large Corporations," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(2), pages 167-190, March.
    4. Burke, Paul J. & Widnyana, Jinnie & Anjum, Zeba & Aisbett, Emma & Resosudarmo, Budy & Baldwin, Kenneth G.H., 2019. "Overcoming barriers to solar and wind energy adoption in two Asian giants: India and Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1216-1228.
    5. Urpelainen, Johannes, 2016. "Energy poverty and perceptions of solar power in marginalized communities: Survey evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 534-539.
    6. Ekundayo Shittu & Erin Baker, 2009. "A control model of policy uncertainty and energy R&D investments," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(4), pages 307-327.
    7. Lukanov, Boris R. & Krieger, Elena M., 2019. "Distributed solar and environmental justice: Exploring the demographic and socio-economic trends of residential PV adoption in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Lam, Patrick T.I. & Law, Angel O.K., 2018. "Financing for renewable energy projects: A decision guide by developmental stages with case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 937-944.
    9. Angelopoulos, Dimitrios & Doukas, Haris & Psarras, John & Stamtsis, Giorgos, 2017. "Risk-based analysis and policy implications for renewable energy investments in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 512-523.
    10. Baker, Erin & Shittu, Ekundayo, 2008. "Uncertainty and endogenous technical change in climate policy models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 2817-2828, November.
    11. Hess, David J. & Lee, Dasom, 2020. "Energy decentralization in California and New York: Conflicts in the politics of shared solar and community choice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. O'Shaughnessy, Eric & Nemet, Gregory F. & Pless, Jacquelyn & Margolis, Robert, 2019. "Addressing the soft cost challenge in U.S. small-scale solar PV system pricing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Sinitskaya, Ekaterina & Gomez, Kelley J. & Bao, Qifang & Yang, Maria C. & MacDonald, Erin F., 2020. "Designing linked journey maps to understand the complexities of the residential solar energy market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1910-1922.
    14. Mensour, O. Nait & El Ghazzani, B. & Hlimi, B. & Ihlal, A., 2019. "A geographical information system-based multi-criteria method for the evaluation of solar farms locations: A case study in Souss-Massa area, southern Morocco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 900-919.
    15. Asmus, Peter, 2008. "Exploring New Models of Solar Energy Development," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 61-70, April.
    16. Meredith Fowlie & Michael Greenstone & Catherine Wolfram, 2018. "Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(3), pages 1597-1644.
    17. Li, Hui & Yi, Hongtao, 2014. "Multilevel governance and deployment of solar PV panels in U.S. cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 19-27.
    18. Baker, T.E. & Epiney, A.S. & Rabiti, C. & Shittu, E., 2018. "Optimal sizing of flexible nuclear hybrid energy system components considering wind volatility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 498-508.
    19. Kevin B. Jones & Mark James, 2017. "Distributed renewables in the new economy: lessons from community solar development in Vermont," Chapters, in: Melissa K. Scanlan (ed.), Law and Policy for a New Economy, chapter 9, pages 189-210, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Simpson, Genevieve & Clifton, Julian, 2015. "The emperor and the cowboys: The role of government policy and industry in the adoption of domestic solar microgeneration systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 141-151.
    21. O'Shaughnessy, Eric & Heeter, Jenny & Gattaciecca, Julien & Sauer, Jenny & Trumbull, Kelly & Chen, Emily, 2019. "Empowered communities: The rise of community choice aggregation in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1110-1119.
    22. Noll, Daniel & Dawes, Colleen & Rai, Varun, 2014. "Solar Community Organizations and active peer effects in the adoption of residential PV," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 330-343.
    23. Ekundayo Shittu & Geoffrey Parker & Xiaoyue Jiang, 2015. "Energy technology investments in competitive and regulatory environments," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 453-471, December.
    24. Setyawati, Dinita, 2020. "Analysis of perceptions towards the rooftop photovoltaic solar system policy in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    25. Subtil Lacerda, Juliana & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2020. "Effectiveness of an ‘open innovation’ approach in renewable energy: Empirical evidence from a survey on solar and wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    26. Mirzania, Pegah & Ford, Andy & Andrews, Deborah & Ofori, George & Maidment, Graeme, 2019. "The impact of policy changes: The opportunities of Community Renewable Energy projects in the UK and the barriers they face," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1282-1296.
    27. Ilka Deluque & Ekundayo Shittu & Jonathan Deason, 2018. "Evaluating the reliability of efficient energy technology portfolios," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 115-138, June.
    28. Brandoni, Caterina & Polonara, Fabio, 2012. "The role of municipal energy planning in the regional energy-planning process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 323-338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Burlinson, Andrew & Davillas, Apostolos & Giulietti, Monica, 2023. "Socioeconomic Inequality in Low-Carbon Technology Adoption," IZA Discussion Papers 16114, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Shittu, Ekundayo & Weigelt, Carmen, 2022. "Accessibility in sustainability transitions: U.S. electric utilities’ deployment of solar," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ogunrinde, Olawale & Shittu, Ekundayo, 2023. "Efficiency and productivity of renewable energy technologies: Evidence from U.S. investor-owned utilities across regional markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Shittu, Ekundayo & Kamdem, Bruno G. & Weigelt, Carmen, 2019. "Heterogeneities in energy technological learning: Evidence from the U.S. electricity industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1034-1049.
    3. Shittu, Ekundayo & Weigelt, Carmen, 2022. "Accessibility in sustainability transitions: U.S. electric utilities’ deployment of solar," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Stewart, Fraser, 2021. "All for sun, sun for all: Can community energy help to overcome socioeconomic inequalities in low-carbon technology subsidies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Ekundayo Shittu & Geoffrey Parker & Nancy Mock, 2018. "Improving communication resilience for effective disaster relief operations," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 379-397, September.
    6. Stewart, Fraser, 2022. "Friends with benefits: How income and peer diffusion combine to create an inequality “trap” in the uptake of low-carbon technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Neij, Lena & Heiskanen, Eva & Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "The deployment of new energy technologies and the need for local learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 274-283.
    8. Rigo, Paula D. & Siluk, Julio Cezar M. & Lacerda, Daniel P. & Spellmeier, Júlia P., 2022. "Competitive business model of photovoltaic solar energy installers in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 39-50.
    9. Simpson, Genevieve & Clifton, Julian, 2016. "Subsidies for residential solar photovoltaic energy systems in Western Australia: Distributional, procedural and outcome justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 262-273.
    10. Emily Schulte & Fabian Scheller & Daniel Sloot & Thomas Bruckner, 2021. "A meta-analysis of residential PV adoption: the important role of perceived benefits, intentions and antecedents in solar energy acceptance," Papers 2112.12464, arXiv.org.
    11. Rakeshkumar Mahto & Deepak Sharma & Reshma John & Chandrasekhar Putcha, 2021. "Agrivoltaics: A Climate-Smart Agriculture Approach for Indian Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
    12. Neij, Lena & Nemet, Gregory, 2022. "Accelerating the low-carbon transition will require policy to enhance local learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Gürkan Kumbaroğlu & Cansu Canaz & Jonathan Deason & Ekundayo Shittu, 2020. "Profitable Decarbonization through E-Mobility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Maren Springsklee & Fabian Scheller, 2022. "Exploring non-residential technology adoption: an empirical analysis of factors associated with the adoption of photovoltaic systems by municipal authorities in Germany," Papers 2212.05281, arXiv.org.
    15. Wichsinee Wibulpolprasert & Umnouy Ponsukcharoen & Siripha Junlakarn & Sopitsuda Tongsopit, 2021. "Preliminarily Screening Geographical Hotspots for New Rooftop PV Installation: A Case Study in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, June.
    16. Alipour, M. & Salim, H. & Stewart, Rodney A. & Sahin, Oz, 2020. "Predictors, taxonomy of predictors, and correlations of predictors with the decision behaviour of residential solar photovoltaics adoption: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. A. K. Pandey & B. Kalidasan & R. Reji Kumar & Saidur Rahman & V. V. Tyagi & Krismadinata & Zafar Said & P. Abdul Salam & Dranreb Earl Juanico & Jamal Uddin Ahamed & Kamal Sharma & M. Samykano & S. K. , 2022. "Solar Energy Utilization Techniques, Policies, Potentials, Progresses, Challenges and Recommendations in ASEAN Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    18. Ilka Deluque & Ekundayo Shittu & Jonathan Deason, 2018. "Evaluating the reliability of efficient energy technology portfolios," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 115-138, June.
    19. Wang, Jianjun & Liu, Fang & Li, Li & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "More than innovativeness: Comparing residents’ motivations for participating renewable energy communities in different innovation segments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 552-563.
    20. Epiney, A. & Rabiti, C. & Talbot, P. & Alfonsi, A., 2020. "Economic analysis of a nuclear hybrid energy system in a stochastic environment including wind turbines in an electricity grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:159:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521004663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.