IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v129y2019icp907-917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No race for the Arctic? Examination of interconnections between legal regimes for offshore petroleum licensing and level of industry activity

Author

Listed:
  • Shapovalova, Daria
  • Stephen, Kathrin

Abstract

Despite the expectation of potentially vast petroleum resources in the offshore Arctic over the last decade, actual exploration and production rates are rather low. As of today, there are only two producing oil fields and one natural gas field in production. While technical challenges and a low oil price are among the explaining factors, the legal regimes for awarding licenses in Arctic waters may have a significant impact on industry interest as well. Offshore licensing regimes in Arctic countries range from State-centric in Russia to market-based in the United States. Further, some States developed additional requirements for companies wishing to operate in the Arctic waters. This paper examines the interconnections between the legal regimes for offshore licenses and the rates of industry activity in petroleum development in Arctic waters. It does so by devising an analytical comparative framework for the licensing regimes across five Arctic States. The results are then analysed in the context of actual exploration and production rates in Arctic waters. The analysis sheds light on the role of licensing regimes on the level of industry interest and corresponding exploration and production rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Shapovalova, Daria & Stephen, Kathrin, 2019. "No race for the Arctic? Examination of interconnections between legal regimes for offshore petroleum licensing and level of industry activity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 907-917.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:907-917
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421519300473
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Zhang & Pengfei Wang & Xiao Li & Dehua Shen, 2018. "Some stylized facts of the cryptocurrency market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(55), pages 5950-5965, November.
    2. Kenneth Clements & Yihui Lan & Jiawei Si, 2018. "Uncertainty in currency mispricing," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(20), pages 2297-2312, April.
    3. Fabio Di Vittorio & Delong Li & Hanlei Yun, 2018. "On Bank Consolidation in a Currency Union," IMF Working Papers 2018/092, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Shu-Fen Wu & Hong-Yi Tong & Yuen-Yee kan & Sheng-Hui Su & Meng-Chi Lee & Chia-Chan Kao & Yu-Hua Lin, 2017. "The Exploration of Health-Related Quality of Life," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 26(1), pages 114-131, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cillari, Azzurra & Stephens, Sian & Werner, Andrea, 2021. "Best practice in license allocation in the oil and gas industry: A review of five countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Shapovalova, Daria & Galimullin, Eduard & Grushevenko, Ekaterina, 2020. "Russian Arctic offshore petroleum governance: The effects of western sanctions and outlook for northern development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nocera, Silvio & Fabio, Alberto & Cavallaro, Federico, 2020. "The adoption of grid transit networks in non-metropolitan contexts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 256-272.
    2. Qi, Qi & Long, Chao & Wu, Jianzhong & Yu, James, 2018. "Impacts of a medium voltage direct current link on the performance of electrical distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 175-188.
    3. Alla A. Petukhina & Raphael C. G. Reule & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2021. "Rise of the machines? Intraday high-frequency trading patterns of cryptocurrencies," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1-2), pages 8-30, January.
    4. Chowdhury, Reaz & Rahman, M. Arifur & Rahman, M. Sohel & Mahdy, M.R.C., 2020. "An approach to predict and forecast the price of constituents and index of cryptocurrency using machine learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 551(C).
    5. Nie, Chun-Xiao, 2020. "Correlation dynamics in the cryptocurrency market based on dimensionality reduction analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 554(C).
    6. Flori, Andrea, 2019. "News and subjective beliefs: A Bayesian approach to Bitcoin investments," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 336-356.
    7. C. Vladimir Rodríguez-Caballero & Mauricio Villanueva-Domínguez, 2022. "Predicting cryptocurrency crash dates," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 2855-2873, December.
    8. Stefano Martinazzi & Daniele Regoli & Andrea Flori, 2020. "A Tale of Two Layers: The Mutual Relationship between Bitcoin and Lightning Network," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Konstantin Häusler & Hongyu Xia, 2022. "Indices on cryptocurrencies: an evaluation," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 149-167, September.
    10. Luis Lorenzo & Javier Arroyo, 2022. "Analysis of the cryptocurrency market using different prototype-based clustering techniques," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-46, December.
    11. Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Adewuyi, Adeolu O. & Albulescu, Claudiu T. & Wohar, Mark E., 2020. "Empirical evidence of extreme dependence and contagion risk between main cryptocurrencies," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    12. Borgards, Oliver & Czudaj, Robert L., 2021. "Features of overreactions in the cryptocurrency market," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 31-48.
    13. Andrew Phiri, 2022. "Can wavelets produce a clearer picture of weak-form market efficiency in Bitcoin?," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(3), pages 373-386, September.
    14. Yan, Kai & Zhang, Wei & Shen, Dehua, 2020. "Stylized facts of the carbon emission market in China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 555(C).
    15. Masuhr Andreas & Trede Mark, 2020. "Bayesian estimation of generalized partition of unity copulas," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 119-131, January.
    16. Garcia-Jorcano, Laura & Benito, Sonia, 2020. "Studying the properties of the Bitcoin as a diversifying and hedging asset through a copula analysis: Constant and time-varying," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Fulvia Pennoni & Francesco Bartolucci & Gianfranco Forte & Ferdinando Ametrano, 2022. "Exploring the dependencies among main cryptocurrency log‐returns: A hidden Markov model," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 51(1), February.
    18. Ramit Sawhney & Shivam Agarwal & Vivek Mittal & Paolo Rosso & Vikram Nanda & Sudheer Chava, 2022. "Cryptocurrency Bubble Detection: A New Stock Market Dataset, Financial Task & Hyperbolic Models," Papers 2206.06320, arXiv.org.
    19. Martin Waltz & Abhay Kumar Singh & Ostap Okhrin, 2022. "Vulnerability-CoVaR: investigating the crypto-market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(9), pages 1731-1745, September.
    20. López-Martín, Carmen & Arguedas-Sanz, Raquel & Muela, Sonia Benito, 2022. "A cryptocurrency empirical study focused on evaluating their distribution functions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 387-407.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:907-917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.