IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v319y2024i2p384-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operations research approaches for improving coordination, cooperation, and collaboration in humanitarian relief chains: A framework and literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Adsanver, Birce
  • Balcik, Burcu
  • Bélanger, Valérie
  • Rancourt, Marie-Ève

Abstract

Given the considerable number of actors in the humanitarian space, coordination is essential for successful disaster response. Furthermore, the sheer size of challenges and limited resources increasingly highlight the need for improved cooperation and collaboration in humanitarian supply chains. A significant number of studies in the literature explore the 3Cs (coordination, cooperation and collaboration), using conceptual, empirical and analytical methods. This paper aims to provide an overview and analysis of the Operations Research (OR) approaches that support decision making for improved 3Cs in humanitarian relief chains and to identify future research directions. To achieve this aim, we first present a holistic view of the discussions in the literature and derive a conceptual framework for 3C mechanisms in humanitarian operations. Based on our framework, we analyse studies that develop OR methods to address the design and management of 3C mechanisms in humanitarian relief chains. We also identify current gaps and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Adsanver, Birce & Balcik, Burcu & Bélanger, Valérie & Rancourt, Marie-Ève, 2024. "Operations research approaches for improving coordination, cooperation, and collaboration in humanitarian relief chains: A framework and literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(2), pages 384-398.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:319:y:2024:i:2:p:384-398
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.11.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172300872X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.11.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:319:y:2024:i:2:p:384-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.