IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v303y2022i1p159-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis for bottleneck assignment problems

Author

Listed:
  • Michael, Elad
  • Wood, Tony A.
  • Manzie, Chris
  • Shames, Iman

Abstract

In assignment problems, decision makers are often interested in not only the optimal assignment, but also the sensitivity of the optimal assignment to perturbations in the assignment weights. Typically, only perturbations to individual assignment weights are considered. We present a novel extension of the traditional sensitivity analysis by allowing for simultaneous variations in all assignment weights. Focusing on the bottleneck assignment problem, we provide two different methods of quantifying the sensitivity of the optimal assignment, and present algorithms for each. Numerical examples as well as a discussion of the complexity for all algorithms are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael, Elad & Wood, Tony A. & Manzie, Chris & Shames, Iman, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis for bottleneck assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 159-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:303:y:2022:i:1:p:159-167
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.02.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722001412
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.02.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chi-Jen Lin & Ue-Pyng Wen, 2007. "Sensitivity Analysis Of Objective Function Coefficients Of The Assignment Problem," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 203-221.
    2. Koltai, Tamas & Terlaky, Tamas, 2000. "The difference between the managerial and mathematical interpretation of sensitivity analysis results in linear programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 257-274, May.
    3. Pentico, David W., 2007. "Assignment problems: A golden anniversary survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 774-793, January.
    4. Jansen, B. & de Jong, J. J. & Roos, C. & Terlaky, T., 1997. "Sensitivity analysis in linear programming: just be careful!," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 15-28, August.
    5. Volgenant, A., 2006. "An addendum on sensitivity analysis of the optimal assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 338-339, February.
    6. Joseph Adams & Egon Balas & Daniel Zawack, 1988. "The Shifting Bottleneck Procedure for Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 391-401, March.
    7. Carraresi, P. & Gallo, G., 1984. "A multi-level bottleneck assignment approach to the bus drivers' rostering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 163-173, May.
    8. Yelin Fu & Jianshan Sun & K. Lai & John Leung, 2015. "A robust optimization solution to bottleneck generalized assignment problem under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 123-133, October.
    9. Lin, Chi-Jen & Wen, Ue-Pyng, 2003. "Sensitivity analysis of the optimal assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 35-46, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Kang-Ting & Lin, Chi-Jen & Wen, Ue-Pyng, 2013. "Type II sensitivity analysis of cost coefficients in the degenerate transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 293-300.
    2. Almoustafa, Samira & Hanafi, Said & Mladenović, Nenad, 2013. "New exact method for large asymmetric distance-constrained vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 386-394.
    3. Hadigheh, Alireza Ghaffari & Terlaky, Tamas, 2006. "Sensitivity analysis in linear optimization: Invariant support set intervals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 1158-1175, March.
    4. Marcel Turkensteen & Dmitry Malyshev & Boris Goldengorin & Panos M. Pardalos, 2017. "The reduction of computation times of upper and lower tolerances for selected combinatorial optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 601-622, July.
    5. Syed Abou Iltaf Hussain & Debasish Baruah & Bapi Dutta & Uttam Kumar Mandal & Sankar Prasad Mondal & Thuleswar Nath, 2019. "Evaluating the impact of service quality on the dynamics of customer satisfaction in the telecommunication industry of Jorhat, Assam," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 31-53, May.
    6. Koltai, Tamás & Tatay, Viola, 2011. "A practical approach to sensitivity analysis in linear programming under degeneracy for management decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 392-398, May.
    7. Illes, Tibor & Terlaky, Tamas, 2002. "Pivot versus interior point methods: Pros and cons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 170-190, July.
    8. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    9. A. Ghaffari Hadigheh & K. Mirnia & T. Terlaky, 2007. "Active Constraint Set Invariancy Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 303-315, June.
    10. Borgonovo, E. & Peccati, L., 2011. "Finite change comparative statics for risk-coherent inventories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 52-62, May.
    11. Lin, Chi-Jen & Wen, Ue-Pyng, 2003. "Sensitivity analysis of the optimal assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 35-46, August.
    12. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Buzzard, Gregery T. & Wendell, Richard E., 2018. "A global tolerance approach to sensitivity analysis in linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 321-337.
    13. Krokhmal, Pavlo A. & Pardalos, Panos M., 2009. "Random assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Ehsan Salari & H. Edwin Romeijn, 2012. "Quantifying the Trade-off Between IMRT Treatment Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Using Direct Aperture Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 518-533, November.
    15. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    16. Sels, Veronique & Craeymeersch, Kjeld & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2011. "A hybrid single and dual population search procedure for the job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 512-523, December.
    17. Pritibhushan Sinha, 2009. "Assignment problems with changeover cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 447-457, November.
    18. Ganesan, Viswanath Kumar & Sivakumar, Appa Iyer, 2006. "Scheduling in static jobshops for minimizing mean flowtime subject to minimum total deviation of job completion times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 633-647, October.
    19. Fowler, John W. & Mönch, Lars, 2022. "A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 1-24.
    20. Ramalhinho Lourenco, Helena, 1996. "Sevast'yanov's algorithm for the flow-shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 176-189, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:303:y:2022:i:1:p:159-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.