IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v264y2018i3p813-829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time traps in supply chains: Is optimal still good enough?

Author

Listed:
  • Dunke, Fabian
  • Heckmann, Iris
  • Nickel, Stefan
  • Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco

Abstract

Operations Researchers support Supply Chain Management and Supply Chain Planning by developing adequate mathematical optimization models and providing suitable solution procedures. In this paper we discuss what adequate could mean. Therefore, we may ask several questions concerning “optimality” in Supply Chain Planning under causal and temporal uncertainty: What is an optimal solution? When is it optimal? For how long is it optimal? How should the design of a supply chain be changed when conditions and requirements ask for new structures? In particular, we discuss new approaches to Supply Chain Planning in order to give an optimal transformation from an initial solution over multiple periods to a desired one rather than just specifying an optimal snapshot solution. Time and uncertainty are the factors triggering the whole discussion. In particular, several flaws often found when dealing with these factors result in so-called “time traps”. We look at the impact of recent technological developments like the Internet of Things or Industry 4.0 on operational supply chain planning and control, and we show how online optimization can help to cope with real-time challenges. Moreover, we re-coin the concept of risk in the realm of Supply Chain Planning. Here the question is how to measure supply chain specific risks and how to incorporate them “adequately” into mathematical models.

Suggested Citation

  • Dunke, Fabian & Heckmann, Iris & Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2018. "Time traps in supply chains: Is optimal still good enough?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 813-829.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:264:y:2018:i:3:p:813-829
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716305537
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-François Cordeau & Federico Pasin & Marius Solomon, 2006. "An integrated model for logistics network design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 59-82, April.
    2. Bernhard Fleischmann & Achim Koberstein, 2015. "Strategic Network Design," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Hartmut Stadtler & Christoph Kilger & Herbert Meyr (ed.), Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, edition 5, chapter 6, pages 107-123, Springer.
    3. Patrick Jaillet & Michael R. Wagner, 2006. "Online Routing Problems: Value of Advanced Information as Improved Competitive Ratios," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 200-210, May.
    4. Justo Puerto & Antonio M. Rodríguez-Chía, 1999. "Location of a moving service facility," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 49(3), pages 373-393, July.
    5. Bjørn Egil Asbjørnslett, 2009. "Assessing the Vulnerability of Supply Chains," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: George A. Zsidisin & Bob Ritchie (ed.), Supply Chain Risk, chapter 2, pages 15-33, Springer.
    6. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2015. "On the fair optimization of cost and customer service level in a supply chain under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 58-66.
    7. Tang, Christopher & Tomlin, Brian, 2008. "The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 12-27, November.
    8. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    9. Li, Suhong & Ragu-Nathan, Bhanu & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. & Subba Rao, S., 2006. "The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 107-124, April.
    10. Alumur, Sibel A. & Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Verter, Vedat, 2012. "Multi-period reverse logistics network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 67-78.
    11. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    12. Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2016. "A general modeling approach to online optimization with lookahead," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 134-153.
    13. Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Ziegler, Hans-Peter, 2012. "A multi-stage stochastic supply network design problem with financial decisions and risk management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 511-524.
    14. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    15. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    16. Reza Farahani & Zvi Drezner & Nasrin Asgari, 2009. "Single facility location and relocation problem with time dependent weights and discrete planning horizon," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 353-368, March.
    17. Sibel A. Alumur & Bahar Y. Kara & M. Teresa Melo, 2015. "Location and Logistics," Springer Books, in: Gilbert Laporte & Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha da Gama (ed.), Location Science, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 419-441, Springer.
    18. Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha Gama, 2015. "Multi-Period Facility Location," Springer Books, in: Gilbert Laporte & Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha da Gama (ed.), Location Science, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 289-310, Springer.
    19. Gregory Tassey, 2014. "Competing in Advanced Manufacturing: The Need for Improved Growth Models and Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(1), pages 27-48, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Savastano & Carlo Amendola & Francesco Bellini & Fabrizio D’Ascenzo, 2019. "Contextual Impacts on Industrial Processes Brought by the Digital Transformation of Manufacturing: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Fabian Dunke & Stefan Nickel, 2021. "Online optimization with gradual look-ahead," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2489-2523, December.
    3. Yasaman Mashayekhy & Amir Babaei & Xue-Ming Yuan & Anrong Xue, 2022. "Impact of Internet of Things (IoT) on Inventory Management: A Literature Survey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Dönmez, Zehranaz & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karsu, Özlem & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2022. "Facility Location in Logistics and Transportation: An enduring relationship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil, 2017. "Responsive and resilient supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks with delivery lead-time sensitive customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 176-200.
    2. Clemons, Rebecca & Slotnick, Susan A., 2016. "The effect of supply-chain disruption, quality and knowledge transfer on firm strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 169-186.
    3. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    4. Sahling, Florian & Kayser, Ariane, 2016. "Strategic supply network planning with vendor selection under consideration of risk and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 201-214.
    5. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    6. Govindan, Kannan & Fattahi, Mohammad, 2017. "Investigating risk and robustness measures for supply chain network design under demand uncertainty: A case study of glass supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 680-699.
    7. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    8. Jin Sung Rha, 2020. "Trends of Research on Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Review Using Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    10. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    11. Tianyi Ding & Zongsheng Huang, 2024. "Uncovering the Research Hotspots in Supply Chain Risk Management from 2004 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Ali, Syed Mithun & Rahman, Md. Hafizur & Tumpa, Tasmia Jannat & Moghul Rifat, Abid Ali & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar, 2018. "Examining price and service competition among retailers in a supply chain under potential demand disruption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 40-47.
    13. Yongxi (Eric) Huang & Yueyue Fan & Chien-Wei Chen, 2014. "An Integrated Biofuel Supply Chain to Cope with Feedstock Seasonality and Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 540-554, November.
    14. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2015. "A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh☆,☆☆☆This manuscript was pro," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 5-21.
    15. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.
    16. Snoeck, André & Udenio, Maximiliano & Fransoo, Jan C., 2019. "A stochastic program to evaluate disruption mitigation investments in the supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 516-530.
    17. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    18. Shashi & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Myriam Ertz, 2020. "Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1215-1246, March.
    19. René Y. Glogg & Anna Timonina-Farkas & Ralf W. Seifert, 2022. "Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 395-423, July.
    20. Mohammad Fattahi, 2020. "A data-driven approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty with consideration of social concerns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 265-284, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:264:y:2018:i:3:p:813-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.