IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v231y2013i1p242-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On ratio-based RTS determination: An extension

Author

Listed:
  • Korhonen, Pekka J.
  • Soleimani-damaneh, Majid
  • Wallenius, Jyrki

Abstract

This technical note extends the results of our recent paper [Korhonen, Soleimani-damaneh, Wallenius, EJOR 215 (2011) 431–438], for determining the RTS status of Decision Making Units in Weight-Restricted DEA models.

Suggested Citation

  • Korhonen, Pekka J. & Soleimani-damaneh, Majid & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2013. "On ratio-based RTS determination: An extension," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 242-243.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:231:y:2013:i:1:p:242-243
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221713004190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Korhonen, Pekka J. & Soleimani-damaneh, Majid & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2011. "Ratio-based RTS determination in weight-restricted DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 431-438, December.
    2. Foroughi, A.A. & Tamiz, M., 2005. "An effective total ranking model for a ranked voting system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 491-496, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alirezaee, Mohammadreza & Hajinezhad, Ensie & Paradi, Joseph C., 2018. "Objective identification of technological returns to scale for data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 678-688.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Ruchuan Zhang & Aijun Li, 2023. "Measuring and Analyzing Operational Efficiency and Returns to Scale in a Time Horizon: Assessment of China’s Electricity Generation & Transmission at Provincial Levels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Paolo Viappiani, 2024. "Volumetric Aggregation Methods for Scoring Rules with Unknown Weights," Post-Print hal-04440153, HAL.
    3. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    4. Llamazares, Bonifacio & Peña, Teresa, 2013. "Aggregating preferences rankings with variable weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 348-355.
    5. Ebrahimnejad, Ali & Tavana, Madjid & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J., 2016. "An integrated data envelopment analysis and simulation method for group consensus ranking," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-17.
    6. Victor V. Podinovski & Robert G. Chambers & Kazim Baris Atici & Iryna D. Deineko, 2016. "Marginal Values and Returns to Scale for Nonparametric Production Frontiers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 236-250, February.
    7. Soltanifar, Mehdi & Shahghobadi, Saeid, 2013. "Selecting a benevolent secondary goal model in data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation by a voting model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 65-74.
    8. Tüselmann, Heinz & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Pishchulov, Grigory, 2015. "Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings – A classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 11-23.
    9. Tavares, L. Valadares, 2012. "An acyclic outranking model to support group decision making within organizations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 782-790.
    10. Haelermans, Carla & Ruggiero, John, 2013. "Estimating technical and allocative efficiency in the public sector: A nonparametric analysis of Dutch schools," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 174-181.
    11. Amin Mostafaee & Majid Soleimani-Damaneh, 2016. "Some Conditions for Characterizing Anchor Points," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(02), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Llamazares, Bonifacio, 2024. "Ranking voting systems and surrogate weights: Explicit formulas for centroid weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 967-976.
    13. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2016. "Ranking Candidates Through Convex Sequences of Variable Weights," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 567-584, May.
    14. Y M Wang & K S Chin & J B Yang, 2007. "Three new models for preference voting and aggregation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(10), pages 1389-1393, October.
    15. Paolo Viappiani, 2020. "Robust winner determination in positional scoring rules with uncertain weights," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 323-367, April.
    16. Alirezaee, Mohammadreza & Hajinezhad, Ensie & Paradi, Joseph C., 2018. "Objective identification of technological returns to scale for data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 678-688.
    17. Mehdi Rhaiem, 2017. "Measurement and determinants of academic research efficiency: a systematic review of the evidence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 581-615, February.
    18. Ignacio Contreras, 2010. "A Distance-Based Consensus Model with Flexible Choice of Rank-Position Weights," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 441-456, September.
    19. Ramin Gharizadeh Beiragh & Reza Alizadeh & Saeid Shafiei Kaleibari & Fausto Cavallaro & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Romualdas Bausys & Abbas Mardani, 2020. "An integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainability Performance Assessment for Insurance Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Llamazares, Bonifacio & Pea, Teresa, 2009. "Preference aggregation and DEA: An analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 714-721, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:231:y:2013:i:1:p:242-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.