IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v191y2008i2p517-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capability adjustment for gamma processes with mean shift consideration in implementing Six Sigma program

Author

Listed:
  • Hsu, Ya-Chen
  • Pearn, W.L.
  • Wu, Pei-Ching

Abstract

In the 1980s, Motorola, Inc. introduced its Six Sigma quality program to the world. Some quality practitioners questioned why the Six Sigma advocates claim it is necessary to add a 1.5[sigma] shift to the process mean when estimating process capability. Bothe [Bothe, D.R., 2002. Statistical reason for the 1.5[sigma] shift. Quality Engineering 14 (3), 479-487] provided a statistical reason for considering such a shift in the process mean for normal processes. In this paper, we consider gamma processes which cover a wide class of applications. For fixed sample size n, the detection power of the control chart can be computed. For small process mean shifts, it is beyond the control chart detection power, which results in overestimating process capability. To resolve the problem, we first examine Bothe's approach and find the detection power is less than 0.5 when data comes from gamma distribution, showing that Bothe's adjustments are inadequate when we have gamma processes. We then calculate adjustments under various sample sizes n and gamma parameter N, with power fixed to 0.5. At the end, we adjust the formula of process capability to accommodate those shifts which can not be detected. Consequently, our adjustments provide much more accurate capability calculation for gamma processes. For illustration purpose, an application example is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsu, Ya-Chen & Pearn, W.L. & Wu, Pei-Ching, 2008. "Capability adjustment for gamma processes with mean shift consideration in implementing Six Sigma program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 517-529, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:191:y:2008:i:2:p:517-529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)00865-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hassan, Jawad, 2015. "Six Sigma performance for non-normal processesAuthor-Name: Aldowaisan, Tariq," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 968-977.
    2. Wang, Xiaofei & Wang, Bing Xing & Hong, Yili & Jiang, Pei Hua, 2021. "Degradation data analysis based on gamma process with random effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1200-1208.
    3. V�ctor Leiva & Carolina Marchant & Helton Saulo & Muhammad Aslam & Fernando Rojas, 2014. "Capability indices for Birnbaum-Saunders processes applied to electronic and food industries," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1881-1902, September.
    4. CHEN, Piao & YE, Zhi-Sheng, 2018. "A systematic look at the gamma process capability indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 589-597.
    5. Jana Fabianová & Jaroslava Janeková & Daniela Onofrejová, 2017. "Cost Analysis of Poor Quality Using a Software Simulation," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 181-181, February.
    6. Mustapha Nourelfath & Tariq Aldowaisan & Jawad Hassan, 2016. "Evaluating Six Sigma failure rate for inverse Gaussian cycle times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 6092-6101, October.
    7. Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Fernández, Arturo J. & Kohansal, Akram, 2020. "Efficient truncated repetitive lot inspection using Poisson defect counts and prior information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 964-974.
    8. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:191:y:2008:i:2:p:517-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.