IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v177y2007i3p1363-1374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of emerging contexts in risky and complex decision settings

Author

Listed:
  • Gustav Lundberg, C.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustav Lundberg, C., 2007. "Models of emerging contexts in risky and complex decision settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1363-1374, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:177:y:2007:i:3:p:1363-1374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(05)00359-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, Elizabeth B. & Ashton, Robert H., 2002. "Threshold adjustment in response to asymmetric loss functions: The case of auditors' "substantial doubt" thresholds," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 1082-1099, November.
    2. Lundberg, C. Gustav, 2004. "Modeling and predicting emerging inference-based decisions in complex and ambiguous legal settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 417-432, March.
    3. Brezillon, Patrick & Pasquier, Laurent & Pomerol, Jean-Charles, 2002. "Reasoning with contextual graphs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 290-298, January.
    4. Lundberg, C. Gustav, 2000. "Made sense and remembered sense: Sensemaking through abduction," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 691-709, December.
    5. Lundberg, C. Gustav & Nagle, Brian M., 2002. "Post-decision inference editing of supportive and counterindicative signals among external auditors in a going concern judgment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 264-281, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hodges, Ron & Mellett, Howard, 2012. "The U.K. private finance initiative: An accounting retrospective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 235-247.
    2. Lundberg, C. Gustav, 2004. "Modeling and predicting emerging inference-based decisions in complex and ambiguous legal settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 417-432, March.
    3. Mu, Enrique & Chung, Tingting Rachel & Reed, Lawrence Ian, 2017. "Paradigm shift in criminal police lineups: Eyewitness identification as multicriteria decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 95-106.
    4. Johannes M. Lehner & David McMillan, 2015. "Making sense in asset markets: Strategies for Implicit Organizations," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1024022-102, December.
    5. Castellani, Marco & Di Giovinazzo, Viviana & Novarese, Marco, 2010. "Procedural rationality and happiness," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 376-383, June.
    6. Merlone, Ugo & Lupano, Matteo, 2022. "Third party funding: The minimum claim value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 738-747.
    7. Nora Muñoz-Izquierdo & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano & María-Jesús Segovia-Vargas & David Pascual-Ezama, 2019. "Is the External Audit Report Useful for Bankruptcy Prediction? Evidence Using Artificial Intelligence," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Gummerus, Johanna & Pihlström, Minna, 2011. "Context and mobile services' value-in-use," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 521-533.
    9. Garrett Grolemund & Hadley Wickham, 2014. "A Cognitive Interpretation of Data Analysis," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 184-204, August.
    10. Mark Schweizer, 2012. "Comparing Holistic and Atomistic Evaluation of Evidence," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2012_21, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    11. Rikke Amilde Løvlid & Solveig Bruvoll & Karsten Brathen & Avelino Gonzalez, 2018. "Modeling the behavior of a hierarchy of command agents with context-based reasoning," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 15(4), pages 369-381, October.
    12. Ittonen, Kim & Tronnes, Per C. & Wong, Leon, 2017. "Substantial doubt and the entropy of auditors’ going concern modifications," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 134-147.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:177:y:2007:i:3:p:1363-1374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.