IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v63y2023ics2212041623000359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of the ecosystem services of marine zooplankton and the key threats to their provision

Author

Listed:
  • Botterell, Zara L.R.
  • Lindeque, Penelope K.
  • Thompson, Richard C.
  • Beaumont, Nicola J.

Abstract

Zooplankton are a key group of organisms at the base of the marine food web and are fundamental to providing a broad range of societal and economic benefits which have previously remained poorly defined. This research addresses this knowledge gap through the provision of a first full assessment of zooplankton ecosystem services and disservices. Anthropogenic stressors such as microplastic pollution, climate change, and fisheries, could negatively affect the marine ecosystem services provided to humans and therefore have a negative impact on human well-being through reduction in food security, livelihoods, income, and good health. Deploying a mixed methodology approach including a semi-systematic literature review and ecological impact assessment, we provide novel evidence of the effects of microplastic pollution (high and low concentrations), fisheries, and climate change on the ecosystem services of three important zooplankton groups (copepods, jellyfish, and krill). We show that the majority of impacts on ecosystem services are negative, with the exception of climate change on jellyfish ecosystem services. Climate change and high microplastic concentration are evidenced to have the most substantial negative impacts on copepods and krill, with accompanying implications for the ecosystem services of climate regulation, water conditions, other materials, science, and entertainment. High microplastic concentration also depressed ecosystem service provision for jellyfish, impacting the services of genetic materials, climate regulation, water conditions, education, and entertainment. Fisheries are also evidenced to have negative impacts on all three zooplankton groups. In the case of jellyfish, climate change is evidenced to have a positive impact on the group’s ecosystem service provision in every category except experiential experiences, which is inversely related to increasing population, owing to their negative perception due to sting injuries. The evidence presented in this study shows that by maintaining sustainable fisheries, reducing plastic pollution, and minimising climate change, we will be actively investing in the current and future provision of marine ecosystem services and the human well-being benefits that they provide.

Suggested Citation

  • Botterell, Zara L.R. & Lindeque, Penelope K. & Thompson, Richard C. & Beaumont, Nicola J., 2023. "An assessment of the ecosystem services of marine zooplankton and the key threats to their provision," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:63:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000359
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000359
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joy N. Smith & Glenn De’ath & Claudio Richter & Astrid Cornils & Jason M. Hall-Spencer & Katharina E. Fabricius, 2016. "Ocean acidification reduces demersal zooplankton that reside in tropical coral reefs," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1124-1129, December.
    2. Abate, Tenaw G. & Börger, Tobias & Aanesen, Margrethe & Falk-Andersson, Jannike & Wyles, Kayleigh J. & Beaumont, Nicola, 2020. "Valuation of marine plastic pollution in the European Arctic: Applying an integrated choice and latent variable model to contingent valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Ghermandi, Andrea & Galil, Bella & Gowdy, John & Nunes, Paulo A.L.D., 2015. "Jellyfish outbreak impacts on recreation in the Mediterranean Sea: welfare estimates from a socioeconomic pilot survey in Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 140-147.
    4. William J. Chivers & Anthony W. Walne & Graeme C. Hays, 2017. "Mismatch between marine plankton range movements and the velocity of climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, April.
    5. Amanda L. Dawson & So Kawaguchi & Catherine K. King & Kathy A. Townsend & Robert King & Wilhelmina M. Huston & Susan M. Bengtson Nash, 2018. "Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Jay Abolofia & Frank Asche & James E. Wilen, 2017. "The Cost of Lice: Quantifying the Impacts of Parasitic Sea Lice on Farmed Salmon," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(3), pages 329-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Tyurina, Elena & Nagapetyan, Artur, 2022. "The economic value of the Glass Beach: Contingent valuation and life satisfaction approaches," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Malte Welling & Ewa Zawojska & Julian Sagebiel, 2022. "Information, Consequentiality and Credibility in Stated Preference Surveys: A Choice Experiment on Climate Adaptation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(1), pages 257-283, May.
    3. George Halkos & Panagiotis Stavros Aslanidis & Angelos Plataniotis & Phoebe Koundouri, 2024. "Global insights on Sustainable Development Goal 14: Reviewing willingness-to-pay levels for marine ecosystem protection and conservation," DEOS Working Papers 2416, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    4. Rahi, Joe El & Weeber, Marc P. & Serafy, Ghada El, 2020. "Modelling the effect of behavior on the distribution of the jellyfish Mauve stinger (Pelagia noctiluca) in the Balearic Sea using an individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 433(C).
    5. Yizheng Li & Yindan Zhang & Guanglong Chen & Kaihang Xu & Han Gong & Kai Huang & Muting Yan & Jun Wang, 2021. "Microplastics in Surface Waters and Sediments from Guangdong Coastal Areas, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Gaspard Philis & Friederike Ziegler & Mona Dverdal Jansen & Lars Christian Gansel & Sara Hornborg & Grete Hansen Aas & Anne Stene, 2022. "Quantifying environmental impacts of cleaner fish used as sea lice treatments in salmon aquaculture with life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1992-2005, December.
    7. Peled, Yoav & Zemah-Shamir, Shiri & Israel, Alvaro & Shechter, Mordechai & Ofir, Eyal & Gal, Gideon, 2020. "Incorporating insurance value into ecosystem services assessments: Mitigation of ecosystem users’ welfare uncertainty through biological control," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    8. Angelica Bianco & Monica Passananti, 2020. "Atmospheric Micro and Nanoplastics: An Enormous Microscopic Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Tobias Börger & Nick Hanley & Robert J. Johnston & Keila Meginnis & Tom Ndebele & Ghamz E. Ali Siyal & Frans de Vries, 2024. "Equity preferences and abatement cost sharing in international environmental agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 416-441, January.
    10. Murray, Alexander G & Moriarty, Meadhbh, 2021. "A simple modelling tool for assessing interaction with host and local infestation of sea lice from salmonid farms on wild salmonids based on processes operating at multiple scales in space and time," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
    11. Moritz A. Drupp & Zachary M. Turk & Ben Groom & Jonas Heckenhahn, 2023. "Limited substitutability, relative price changes and the uplifting of public natural capital values," Papers 2308.04400, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    12. Yu, Ying & Yamaguchi, Kensuke & Thuy, Truong Dang & Kittner, Noah, 2022. "Will the public in emerging economies support renewable energy? Evidence from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    14. S. R. Kahane-Rapport & M. F. Czapanskiy & J. A. Fahlbusch & A. S. Friedlaender & J. Calambokidis & E. L. Hazen & J. A. Goldbogen & M. S. Savoca, 2022. "Field measurements reveal exposure risk to microplastic ingestion by filter-feeding megafauna," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Bronnmann, Julia & Asche, Frank, 2017. "Sustainable Seafood From Aquaculture and Wild Fisheries: Insights From a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 113-119.
    16. Oglend, Atle & Asche, Frank & Straume, Hans-Martin, 2024. "Rent formation and distortions due to quotas in biological production processes," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Ingunn Y. Gudbrandsdottir & Nína M. Saviolidis & Gudrun Olafsdottir & Gudmundur V. Oddsson & Hlynur Stefansson & Sigurdur G. Bogason, 2021. "Transition Pathways for the Farmed Salmon Value Chain: Industry Perspectives and Sustainability Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Tobias Börger & Tenaw G. Abate & Margrethe Aanesen & Ewa Zawojska, 2021. "Payment and Policy Consequentiality in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation: Experimental Design Effects on Self-Reported Perceptions," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 97(2), pages 407-424.
    19. Börger, Tobias & Ngoc, Quach Thi Khanh & Kuhfuss, Laure & Hien, Tang Thi & Hanley, Nick & Campbell, Danny, 2021. "Preferences for coastal and marine conservation in Vietnam: Accounting for differences in individual choice set formation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Haarstad, Aleksander H. & Lavrutich, Maria & Strypet, Kristian & Strøm, Eivind, 2022. "Multi-commodity price risk hedging in the Atlantic salmon farming industry," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:63:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.