IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v471y2022ics0304380022001697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How more sophisticated leaf biomass simulations can increase the realism of modelled animal populations

Author

Listed:
  • Krause, Jens
  • Harfoot, Mike
  • Hoeks, Selwyn
  • Anthoni, Peter
  • Brown, Calum
  • Rounsevell, Mark
  • Arneth, Almut

Abstract

Animal biodiversity, and its key roles in ecosystem state and functioning, is facing critical challenges in the wake of anthropogenic activities. It is urgently necessary to improve understanding of the interconnections between animals and the vegetation within ecosystems. Process-based modelling has shown to be a mighty tool in making assessments on ecological processes. We assess the effect of different vegetation models on simulated animal biodiversity by replacing the vegetation module within Madingley, a multi-trophic model of functional diversity with LPJ-GUESS, a dynamic global vegetation model. We compare the output metrics of the model system to Madingley’s default version for four ecosystem types around the globe and analyse whether the realism of the simulation results increased as a result of the coupling between Madingley and LPJ-GUESS. Simulated animal populations react to the coupling by shifting towards smaller individuals with a higher abundance. General shifts in body mass and animal distributions can be traced back to ecological processes, allowing in-depth analysis of heterotrophic responses to changes in leaf biomass. We also derive power-law relationships for herbivory to NPP and herbivore biomass to NPP and conclude that the coupled model system simulates animal populations that follow reasonable power-laws which are similar to power-laws derived from empirical data. Our results indicate that developing process-based model systems is a viable way to assess multi-trophic interconnections between animal populations and the ecosystems vegetation.

Suggested Citation

  • Krause, Jens & Harfoot, Mike & Hoeks, Selwyn & Anthoni, Peter & Brown, Calum & Rounsevell, Mark & Arneth, Almut, 2022. "How more sophisticated leaf biomass simulations can increase the realism of modelled animal populations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:471:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001697
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022001697
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michela Pacifici & Wendy B. Foden & Piero Visconti & James E. M. Watson & Stuart H.M. Butchart & Kit M. Kovacs & Brett R. Scheffers & David G. Hole & Tara G. Martin & H. Resit Akçakaya & Richard T. Co, 2015. "Assessing species vulnerability to climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 215-224, March.
    2. Brian J. Enquist & Andrew J. Abraham & Michael B. J. Harfoot & Yadvinder Malhi & Christopher E. Doughty, 2020. "The megabiota are disproportionately important for biosphere functioning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Wramneby, Anna & Smith, Benjamin & Zaehle, Sönke & Sykes, Martin T., 2008. "Parameter uncertainties in the modelling of vegetation dynamics—Effects on tree community structure and ecosystem functioning in European forest biomes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 277-290.
    4. Bradley J. Cardinale & J. Emmett Duffy & Andrew Gonzalez & David U. Hooper & Charles Perrings & Patrick Venail & Anita Narwani & Georgina M. Mace & David Tilman & David A. Wardle & Ann P. Kinzig & Gre, 2012. "Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 59-67, June.
    5. David U. Hooper & E. Carol Adair & Bradley J. Cardinale & Jarrett E. K. Byrnes & Bruce A. Hungate & Kristin L. Matulich & Andrew Gonzalez & J. Emmett Duffy & Lars Gamfeldt & Mary I. O’Connor, 2012. "A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 105-108, June.
    6. Bradley J. Cardinale & J. Emmett Duffy & Andrew Gonzalez & David U. Hooper & Charles Perrings & Patrick Venail & Anita Narwani & Georgina M. Mace & David Tilman & David A.Wardle & Ann P. Kinzig & Gret, 2012. "Correction: Corrigendum: Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 326-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah R. Weiskopf & Forest Isbell & Maria Isabel Arce-Plata & Moreno Di Marco & Mike Harfoot & Justin Johnson & Susannah B. Lerman & Brian W. Miller & Toni Lyn Morelli & Akira S. Mori & Ensheng Weng &, 2024. "Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Jonathan S. Lefcheck & Graham J. Edgar & Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Amanda E. Bates & Conor Waldock & Simon J. Brandl & Stuart Kininmonth & Scott D. Ling & J. Emmett Duffy & Douglas B. Rasher & Aneil F. A, 2021. "Species richness and identity both determine the biomass of global reef fish communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Wang Tian & Huayong Zhang & Lei Zhao & Feifan Zhang & Hai Huang, 2017. "Phytoplankton Diversity Effects on Community Biomass and Stability along Nutrient Gradients in a Eutrophic Lake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Chun-Wei Chang & Takeshi Miki & Hao Ye & Sami Souissi & Rita Adrian & Orlane Anneville & Helen Agasild & Syuhei Ban & Yaron Be’eri-Shlevin & Yin-Ru Chiang & Heidrun Feuchtmayr & Gideon Gal & Satoshi I, 2022. "Causal networks of phytoplankton diversity and biomass are modulated by environmental context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Frank, Eyal G. & Sudarshan, Anant, 2022. "The Social Costs of Keystone Species Collapse : Evidence From The Decline of Vultures in India," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1433, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    6. Yang Liu & Jing Zhao & Xi Zheng & Xiaoyang Ou & Yaru Zhang & Jiaying Li, 2023. "Evaluation of Biodiversity Maintenance Capacity in Forest Landscapes: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Nibedita Mukherjee & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam, 2014. "Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217963, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Yiwei Lian & Yang Bai & Zhongde Huang & Maroof Ali & Jie Wang & Haoran Chen, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Changes and Habitats of Rare and Endangered Species in Yunnan Province Based on MaxEnt Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Eva M. Murgado-Armenteros & María Gutierrez-Salcedo & Francisco José Torres-Ruiz, 2020. "The Concern about Biodiversity as a Criterion for the Classification of the Sustainable Consumer: A Cross-Cultural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & James E. M. Watson & Siao Sun & Wei Qi & Zhenbo Wang & Jianguo Liu, 2024. "Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Shuangshuang Liu & Qipeng Liao & Mingzhu Xiao & Dengyue Zhao & Chunbo Huang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Its Response of Landscape Dynamic in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Jennifer M. H. Loch & Linda J. Walters & Melinda L. Donnelly & Geoffrey S. Cook, 2021. "Restored Coastal Habitat Can “Reel In” Juvenile Sportfish: Population and Community Responses in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Jessica Chavez & Vincent Nijman & Desak Ketut Tristiana Sukmadewi & Made Dwi Sadnyana & Sophie Manson & Marco Campera, 2024. "Impact of Farm Management on Soil Fertility in Agroforestry Systems in Bali, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Guangzi Li & Jun Cai, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Mountain Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies: A Case Study of Jieshi Mountain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Qiujin Chen & Yuqi Zhang & Yin Zhang & Mingliang Kong, 2022. "Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas: Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Huixin Wang & Jing Xie & Shixian Luo & Duy Thong Ta & Qian Wang & Jiao Zhang & Daer Su & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay between Landscape Planning and Human Well-Being: A Scientometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Pedro Daleo & Juan Alberti & Enrique J. Chaneton & Oscar Iribarne & Pedro M. Tognetti & Jonathan D. Bakker & Elizabeth T. Borer & Martín Bruschetti & Andrew S. MacDougall & Jesús Pascual & Mahesh Sank, 2023. "Environmental heterogeneity modulates the effect of plant diversity on the spatial variability of grassland biomass," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Gackstetter, David & von Bloh, Malte & Hannus, Veronika & Meyer, Sebastian T. & Weisser, Wolfgang & Luksch, Claudia & Asseng, Senthold, 2023. "Autonomous field management – An enabler of sustainable future in agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    19. Antonia Katharina Ruckli & Sabine Dippel & Nora Durec & Monika Gebska & Jonathan Guy & Juliane Helmerichs & Christine Leeb & Herman Vermeer & Stefan Hörtenhuber, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Pig Farms in Selected European Countries: Combining LCA and Key Performance Indicators for Biodiversity Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Danish A. Ahmed & Sergei V. Petrovskii & Paulo F. C. Tilles, 2018. "The “Lévy or Diffusion” Controversy: How Important Is the Movement Pattern in the Context of Trapping?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:471:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.