IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v462y2021ics0304380021003380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative roles of fundamental processes underpinning PEG dynamics in dimictic lakes as revealed by a self-organizing, multi-population plankton model

Author

Listed:
  • Sierra E, Cagle
  • Daniel L, Roelke

Abstract

The longstanding PEG (Phytoplankton Ecology Group) qualitative/conceptual model describes generalized seasonal phytoplankton dynamics in temperate lakes and suggests important mechanisms driving these processes. In the research presented here, we re-created the conceptual PEG dynamics using a novel mechanistic numerical plankton model. The numerical model incorporates only a handful of interacting factors and biological rules. Key model features include seasonally variable temperature, mixing depth, and light, dynamic zooplankton and phytoplankton populations, and multiple dynamic nutrient concentrations. The model design is unique in that it incorporates a population-rich phytoplankton assemblage where life-history traits of members are based on ecological principles (trade-offs between traits), allowing the assemblage to organize over time based on nutrient competition and grazing. Using 50th year solutions to the model solved with fourth-order Runge-Kutta methods, i.e., a period when the dynamics had reached stable non-equilibrium states, sensitivity analyses were run by individually varying model parameters +/- 50% and comparing the effect on model responses of interest. Simulation analyses revealed the important role light and temperature limitation played both early and late in the year controlling plankton biomass. Trade-offs in phytoplankton life-history characteristics determined the composition of the spring bloom under non-nutrient limiting conditions (fast-growing, edible populations dominated) and the post clear-water phase assemblage under low nutrient conditions (slower-growing, less-edible populations dominated). Grazer characteristics, specifically rate of grazing and spring “emergence”, determined the occurrence of the clear-water phase and influenced the post assemblage composition, where a clear-water phase was absent when the grazing rate was low or spring emergence absent, and the highly inedible populations were lost from the assemblage. Hydraulic flushing also played an important role where diminished inflow led to higher richness, evenness and diversity due to greater overwintering of less-edible taxa, which influenced phytoplankton composition during spring bloom, diminishing secondary productivity. These results increase understanding of the relative roles of fundamental mechanisms structuring natural aquatic ecosystems and reinforce the significance of key biotic and abiotic system components of temperate lakes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sierra E, Cagle & Daniel L, Roelke, 2021. "Relative roles of fundamental processes underpinning PEG dynamics in dimictic lakes as revealed by a self-organizing, multi-population plankton model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 462(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:462:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021003380
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021003380
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Withrow, Frances G. & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Bhattacharyya, Joydeb, 2018. "Water column processes differentially influence richness and diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 22-32.
    2. Daniel L Roelke & Sofie Spatharis, 2015. "Phytoplankton Assemblage Characteristics in Recurrently Fluctuating Environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Snortheim, Craig A. & Hanson, Paul C. & McMahon, Katherine D. & Read, Jordan S. & Carey, Cayelan C. & Dugan, Hilary A., 2017. "Meteorological drivers of hypolimnetic anoxia in a eutrophic, north temperate lake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 343(C), pages 39-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhattacharyya, Joydeb & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Withrow, Frances G., 2018. "Exploitative competition of invaders differentially influences the diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages in spatially heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 59-66.
    2. Qi Wang & Leon Boegman, 2021. "Multi-Year Simulation of Western Lake Erie Hydrodynamics and Biogeochemistry to Evaluate Nutrient Management Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Weng, Weizhe & Boyle, Kevin J. & Farrell, Kaitlin J. & Carey, Cayelan C. & Cobourn, Kelly M. & Dugan, Hilary A. & Hanson, Paul C. & Ward, Nicole K. & Weathers, Kathleen C., 2020. "Coupling Natural and Human Models in the Context of a Lake Ecosystem: Lake Mendota, Wisconsin, USA," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Cagle, Sierra E. & Roelke, Daniel L., 2024. "Chaotic mixotroph dynamics arise with nutrient loading: Implications for mixotrophy as a harmful bloom forming mechanism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    5. Farrell, Kaitlin J. & Ward, Nicole K. & Krinos, Arianna I. & Hanson, Paul C. & Daneshmand, Vahid & Figueiredo, Renato J. & Carey, Cayelan C., 2020. "Ecosystem-scale nutrient cycling responses to increasing air temperatures vary with lake trophic state," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    6. Laura Melo Vieira Soares & Maria Calijuri & Talita Fernanda Silva & Evlyn Marcia Leão Novo, 2021. "Climate change enhances deepwater warming of subtropical reservoirs: evidence from hydrodynamic modelling," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Soares, L.M.V. & Calijuri, M.C., 2021. "Sensitivity and identifiability analyses of parameters for water quality modeling of subtropical reservoirs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 458(C).
    8. Wen-Cheng Liu & Hong-Ming Liu & Rita Sau-Wai Yam, 2021. "A Three-Dimensional Coupled Hydrodynamic-Ecological Modeling to Assess the Planktonic Biomass in a Subalpine Lake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Smeti, Evangelia & Roelke, Daniel L. & Tsirtsis, George & Spatharis, Sofie, 2018. "Species extinctions strengthen the relationship between biodiversity and resource use efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 75-86.
    10. Weng, Weizhe & Boyle, Kevin J. & Carey, Cayelan & Cobourn, Kelly M. & Dugan, Hilary & Farrell, Kaitlin & Hanson, Paul & Brahma, Sreeya Brahma & Ward, Nicole & Weathers, Kathleen, 2018. "Coupling Water Quality Numerical Simulation and Hedonic Models to Evaluate Impact of Changes in Nutrient Loading," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274030, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Zakharova, L. & Meyer, K.M. & Seifan, M., 2019. "Trait-based modelling in ecology: A review of two decades of research," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Fenocchi, Andrea & Rogora, Michela & Morabito, Giuseppe & Marchetto, Aldo & Sibilla, Stefano & Dresti, Claudia, 2019. "Applicability of a one-dimensional coupled ecological-hydrodynamic numerical model to future projections in a very deep large lake (Lake Maggiore, Northern Italy/Southern Switzerland)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 38-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:462:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021003380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.