IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v435y2020ics0304380020303367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors controlling long-term carbon dioxide exchange between a Douglas-fir stand and the atmosphere identified using an artificial neural network approach

Author

Listed:
  • Briegel, Ferdinand
  • Lee, Sung Ching
  • Black, T. Andrew
  • Jassal, Rachhpal S.
  • Christen, Andreas

Abstract

It is critical to have long-term carbon dioxide (CO2) flux observations in forest ecosystems to understand how changing climate can affect forest carbon (C) stocks and CO2 exchange between forests and the atmosphere. In this study, fifteen years (2002–2016) of continuous eddy-covariance flux and climate measurements in an intermediate-aged Douglas-fir stand on the east coast of Vancouver Island, Canada, were analyzed. First, the eddy covariance-measured CO2 fluxes were partitioned into gross primary production and ecosystem respiration using two artificial neural networks. Second, the responses of net ecosystem production, gross primary production and ecosystem respiration to interannual climate variability, including five El Niño-Southern Oscillation events, were determined. Three hyper-parameters (number of layers, hidden units, and batch size) of each artificial neural network were set by Bayesian optimization using sequential model-based optimization while the remaining hyper-parameters were taken from the literature. The first artificial neural network was fitted using only nighttime CO2 flux data and applied to estimate nighttime and daytime ecosystem respiration values, and the second one was used to gap-fill gross primary production values. In addition, a predictor analysis was done to investigate the most influential predictors (i.e., environmental variables) within seasons and years. When applied to half-hourly data, the ecosystem respiration model had an R2 of 0.43, whereas the gross primary production model had an R2 of 0.80. The stand was a moderate C sink (average net ecosystem production of 118 ± 404 g C m−2 year−1) during the entire study period, except for the years 2002–2006 when the stand was a moderate C source. The mean annual values of gross primary production and ecosystem respiration were 1649 ± 157 g C m−2 year−1 and 1531 ± 410 g C m−2 year−1, respectively. Our analysis showed that soil temperature was the most important predictor for the ecosystem respiration model, and photosynthetically active irradiance was the most important predictor for the gross primary production model. However, during dry periods in late summer, soil moisture became the most important predictor. Interannual variability of net ecosystem production was only slightly affected by annual total precipitation, mean soil temperature and mean air temperature. Instead, it depended on spring mean air temperature (start of the growing season), summer total precipitation (indicative of water deficiency) and mean summer air temperature. El Niño and La Niña events generally resulted in lower and higher annual net ecosystem production, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Briegel, Ferdinand & Lee, Sung Ching & Black, T. Andrew & Jassal, Rachhpal S. & Christen, Andreas, 2020. "Factors controlling long-term carbon dioxide exchange between a Douglas-fir stand and the atmosphere identified using an artificial neural network approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:435:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020303367
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020303367
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen, Xuding & Zhao, Zhonghui & Deng, Xiangwen & Xiang, Wenhua & Tian, Dalun & Yan, Wende & Zhou, Xiaolu & Peng, Changhui, 2014. "Applying an artificial neural network to simulate and predict Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation carbon flux in subtropical China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 19-26.
    2. Taweh Beysolow II, 2017. "Introduction to Deep Learning Using R," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4842-2734-3, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Jianchao & Xu, Kai & Zhu, Yanhui & Hu, Fang & Li, Liuhuan, 2020. "Prediction and analysis of net ecosystem carbon exchange based on gradient boosting regression and random forest," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Humberto Elias Garcia Lopes & Marlusa de Sevilha Gosling, 2021. "Cluster Analysis in Practice: Dealing with Outliers in Managerial Research," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(1), pages 200081-2000.
    3. Wan, Heyang & Qi, Hongwei & Shang, Songhao, 2023. "Estimating soil water and salt contents from field measurements with time domain reflectometry using machine learning algorithms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Silva, Gabriela Cristina Costa & Neves, Júlio César Lima & Marcatti, Gustavo Eduardo & Soares, Carlos Pedro Boechat & Calegario, Natalino & Júnior, Carlos Alberto Araújo & Gonzáles, Duberlí Geomar Ele, 2023. "Improving 3-PG calibration and parameterization using artificial neural networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:435:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020303367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.