IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v385y2018icp58-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partial exclusion of spawning Cyprinus carpio to improve coastal marsh habitat may come at the cost of increased carp population growth

Author

Listed:
  • Caskenette, Amanda
  • Enders, Eva C.
  • Watkinson, Doug
  • Wrubleski, Dale

Abstract

Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) feeding and spawning behaviours, when abundant, negatively impact shallow water habitats essential for marsh ecosystem functioning. A common coastal marsh restoration practice is to create barriers to carp movement into a marsh from connected lakes. These barriers often do not exclude all carp from a marsh, and the lower adult density and improved habitat may increase overall carp recruitment success. A population model was created for Delta Marsh on Lake Manitoba, Canada. Varying the proportion of the total carp population spawning in the marsh indicates that, with partial carp exclusion, the improvement in spawning conditions increases carp population growth rate and decreases generation time. Increasing fishing mortality can help mitigate this effect, indicating that a multi-tiered management approach is best. It is important that fish exclusion programs be implemented with awareness of this unanticipated result.

Suggested Citation

  • Caskenette, Amanda & Enders, Eva C. & Watkinson, Doug & Wrubleski, Dale, 2018. "Partial exclusion of spawning Cyprinus carpio to improve coastal marsh habitat may come at the cost of increased carp population growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 58-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:385:y:2018:i:c:p:58-64
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018302400
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stubben, Chris & Milligan, Brook, 2007. "Estimating and Analyzing Demographic Models Using the popbio Package in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i11).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graciá, Eva & Rodríguez-Caro, Roberto C. & Sanz-Aguilar, Ana & Anadón, José D. & Botella, Francisco & García-García, Angel Luis & Wiegand, Thorsten & Giménez, Andrés, 2020. "Assessment of the key evolutionary traits that prevent extinctions in human-altered habitats using a spatially explicit individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    2. Hsien-Yung Lin & Eduardo G. Martins & Michael Power & James A. Crossman & Alf J. Leake & Steven J. Cooke, 2022. "An assessment tool for estimating effects of entrainment at hydropower facilities on adfluvial fish populations," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 556-571, December.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:22:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Tremblay, Raymond L. & Tyre, Andrew J. & Pérez, Maria-Eglée & Ackerman, James D., 2021. "Population projections from holey matrices: Using prior information to estimate rare transition events," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 447(C).
    5. Kneib, Thomas & Petzoldt, Thomas, 2007. "Introduction to the Special Volume on "Ecology and Ecological Modeling in R"," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i01).
    6. Davison, Raziel & Stadman, Marc & Jongejans, Eelke, 2019. "Stochastic effects contribute to population fitness differences," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Lewis, Dakota M. & Vardi, Tali & Maher, Rebecca L. & Correa, Adrienne M.S. & Cook, Geoffrey S., 2022. "Predicting shifts in demography of Orbicella franksi following simulated disturbance and restoration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    8. Clinton Stipek & Rolando Santos & Elizabeth Babcock & Diego Lirman, 2020. "Modelling the resilience of seagrass communities exposed to pulsed freshwater discharges: A seascape approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Otjacques, W. & De Laender, F. & Kestemont, P., 2016. "Discerning the causes of a decline in a common European fish, the roach (Rutilus rutilus L.): A modelling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 322(C), pages 92-100.
    10. Romanov, Michael S. & Masterov, Vladimir B., 2020. "Low breeding performance of the Steller’s sea eagle (Haliaeetus pelagicus) causes the populations to decline," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    11. Kendall, Bruce E. & Fujiwara, Masami & Diaz-Lopez, Jasmin & Schneider, Sandra & Voigt, Jakob & Wiesner, Sören, 2019. "Persistent problems in the construction of matrix population models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 33-43.
    12. Lewis, D.L. & Breck, S.W. & Wilson, K.R. & Webb, C.T., 2014. "Modeling black bear population dynamics in a human-dominated stochastic environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 51-58.
    13. Anaïs Gibert & Danièle Magda & Laurent Hazard, 2015. "Interplay between Endophyte Prevalence, Effects and Transmission: Insights from a Natural Grass Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:385:y:2018:i:c:p:58-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.