IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v381y2018icp46-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A beta distribution-based moment closure enhances the reliability of trait-based aggregate models for natural populations and communities

Author

Listed:
  • Klauschies, Toni
  • Coutinho, Renato Mendes
  • Gaedke, Ursula

Abstract

Ecological communities are complex adaptive systems that exhibit remarkable feedbacks between their biomass and trait dynamics. Trait-based aggregate models cope with this complexity by focusing on the temporal development of the community’s aggregate properties such as its total biomass, mean trait and trait variance. They are based on particular assumptions about the shape of the underlying trait distribution, which is commonly assumed to be normal. However, ecologically important traits are usually restricted to a finite range, and empirical trait distributions are often skewed or multimodal. As a result, normal distribution-based aggregate models may fail to adequately represent the biomass and trait dynamics of natural communities. We resolve this mismatch by developing a new moment closure approach assuming the trait values to be beta-distributed. We show that the beta distribution captures important shape properties of both observed and simulated trait distributions, which cannot be captured by a Gaussian. We further demonstrate that a beta distribution-based moment closure can strongly enhance the reliability of trait-based aggregate models. We compare the biomass, mean trait and variance dynamics of a full trait distribution (FD) model to the ones of beta (BA) and normal (NA) distribution-based aggregate models, under different selection regimes. This way, we demonstrate under which general conditions (stabilizing, fluctuating or disruptive selection) different aggregate models are reliable tools. All three models predicted very similar biomass and trait dynamics under stabilizing selection yielding unimodal trait distributions with small standing trait variation. We also obtained an almost perfect match between the results of the FD and BA models under fluctuating selection, promoting skewed trait distributions and ongoing oscillations in the biomass and trait dynamics. In contrast, the NA model showed unrealistic trait dynamics and exhibited different alternative stable states, and thus a high sensitivity to initial conditions under fluctuating selection. Under disruptive selection, both aggregate models failed to reproduce the results of the FD model with the mean trait values remaining within their ecologically feasible ranges in the BA model but not in the NA model. Overall, a beta distribution-based moment closure strongly improved the realism of trait-based aggregate models.

Suggested Citation

  • Klauschies, Toni & Coutinho, Renato Mendes & Gaedke, Ursula, 2018. "A beta distribution-based moment closure enhances the reliability of trait-based aggregate models for natural populations and communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 381(C), pages 46-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:381:y:2018:i:c:p:46-77
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018300425
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Norberg & Mark C. Urban & Mark Vellend & Christopher A. Klausmeier & Nicolas Loeuille, 2012. "Eco-evolutionary responses of biodiversity to climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(10), pages 747-751, October.
    2. Damian Clancy & Sang Taphou Mendy, 2011. "Approximating the Quasi-stationary Distribution of the SIS Model for Endemic Infection," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 603-618, September.
    3. William A. Nelson & Edward McCauley & Frederick J. Wrona, 2005. "Stage-structured cycles promote genetic diversity in a predator–prey system of Daphnia and algae," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7024), pages 413-417, January.
    4. U. Dieckmann & R. Law, 1996. "The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution: A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes," Working Papers wp96001, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    5. Merico, Agostino & Bruggeman, Jorn & Wirtz, Kai, 2009. "A trait-based approach for downscaling complexity in plankton ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 3001-3010.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graciá, Eva & Rodríguez-Caro, Roberto C. & Sanz-Aguilar, Ana & Anadón, José D. & Botella, Francisco & García-García, Angel Luis & Wiegand, Thorsten & Giménez, Andrés, 2020. "Assessment of the key evolutionary traits that prevent extinctions in human-altered habitats using a spatially explicit individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    2. Cropp, Roger & Norbury, John, 2020. "The potential for coral reefs to adapt to a changing climate - an eco-evolutionary modelling perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 426(C).
    3. Akihiko Mougi, 2019. "Rapid evolution of prey maintains predator diversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Åke Brännström & Jacob Johansson & Niels Von Festenberg, 2013. "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Adaptive Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Nonaka, Etsuko & Kuparinen, Anna, 2023. "Limited effects of size-selective harvesting and harvesting-induced life-history changes on the temporal variability of biomass dynamics in complex food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    3. Cressman, Ross & Hofbauer, Josef & Riedel, Frank, 2005. "Stability of the Replicator Equation for a Single-Species with a Multi-Dimensional Continuous Trait Space," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 12/2005, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    4. Peña, Jorge & González-Forero, Mauricio, 2020. "Eusociality through conflict dissolution via maternal reproductive specialization," IAST Working Papers 20-110, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    5. U. Dieckmann & M. Doebeli, 1999. "On the Origin of Species by Sympatric Speciation," Working Papers ir99013, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    6. Singer, Alexander & Johst, Karin & Banitz, Thomas & Fowler, Mike S. & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Gutiérrez, Alvaro G. & Hartig, Florian & Krug, Rainer M. & Liess, Matthias & Matlack, Glenn & Meyer, Katrin M, 2016. "Community dynamics under environmental change: How can next generation mechanistic models improve projections of species distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 63-74.
    7. Hammerstein, Peter & Leimar, Olof, 2015. "Evolutionary Game Theory in Biology," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    8. Gunnar Brandt & Agostino Merico & Björn Vollan & Achim Schlüter, 2012. "Human Adaptive Behavior in Common Pool Resource Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Hernán Darío Toro-Zapata & Gerard Olivar-Tost, 2018. "Mathematical Model For The Evolutionary Dynamic Of Innovation In City Public Transport Systems," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7(2), pages 77-98.
    10. Amit Vutha & Martin Golubitsky, 2015. "Normal Forms and Unfoldings of Singular Strategy Functions," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 180-213, June.
    11. Wan, Nian-Feng & Jiang, Jie-Xian & Li, Bo, 2014. "Modeling ecological two-sidedness for complex ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 287(C), pages 36-43.
    12. Meng, Xin-zhu & Zhao, Sheng-nan & Zhang, Wen-yan, 2015. "Adaptive dynamics analysis of a predator–prey model with selective disturbance," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 946-958.
    13. Dercole, Fabio & Della Rossa, Fabio, 2017. "A deterministic eco-genetic model for the short-term evolution of exploited fish stocks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 343(C), pages 80-100.
    14. Lindh, Magnus & Manzoni, Stefano, 2021. "Plant evolution along the ‘fast–slow’ growth economics spectrum under altered precipitation regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 448(C).
    15. Horan, Richard D. & Shogren, Jason F. & Bulte, Erwin H., 2011. "Joint determination of biological encephalization, economic specialization," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 426-439, May.
    16. M. Doebeli & U. Dieckmann, 2000. "Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions," Working Papers ir00040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    17. Ross Cressman, 2009. "Continuously stable strategies, neighborhood superiority and two-player games with continuous strategy space," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(2), pages 221-247, June.
    18. van Leeuwen, E. & Jansen, V.A.A., 2010. "Evolutionary consequences of a search image," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 49-55.
    19. Kortessis, Nicholas & Chesson, Peter, 2021. "Character displacement in the presence of multiple trait differences: Evolution of the storage effect in germination and growth," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 54-66.
    20. M. Ruijgrok & Th. Ruijgrok, 2015. "An Effective Replicator Equation for Games with a Continuous Strategy Set," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 157-179, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:381:y:2018:i:c:p:46-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.