IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v360y2017icp27-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A road map for developing and applying object-oriented bayesian networks to “WICKED” problems

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin-Fink, Nicole
  • Reilly, Brian K.

Abstract

Wildlife managers, conservation-based authorities and NGOS are often tasked to provide management guidelines concerning “wicked” problems and Ecosystem Services (ESS) with scarce data and limited resources. More often than not, this dilemma is further intensified by competing objectives and the need for economic profitability. A range of quantitative and qualitative models are often applied to model ecosystem services. However, lack of quantifiable data remains an obstacle. We provide a brief overview of Bayesian Networks (BNs), Object Oriented Bayesian Networks (OOBNs), Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs), and Dynamic Object Oriented Bayesian Networks (DOOBNs) construction and a flow chart highlights their utility. OOBNs are a semi-quantitative modelling approach that uses Bayes probability theorem to represent ecological complexities and conservation concerns. Its transparency allows it to act as a conceptual system and a decision support tool. And yet, Bayesian networks are not commonly applied to the ecological discipline because they are computationally expensive. We promote the notion that sustainable management is advanced by providing biology-based decision-making networks to address wicked problems. First, we provide a brief reasoning for the applicability of Bayes theorem to wicked challenges. Then, we demonstrate the efficiency of Bayesian modelling by applying it to the case study of the black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) and blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) hybridization concern in South Africa. Empirical data, in addition to expert explicit understanding of uncertainties was utilized to infer the probability that specific ecological, biological, and economic parameters, and their relationships, facilitate hybridization. We found the following management variables to be key to impact the probability of hybridization: (i) blue wildebeest male to black wildebeest male ratio, (ii) land cover (tree savanna vs. grassland), and (iii) spatial connectivity (i.e., fences). By quantifying ecological uncertainty, OOBN illuminates decision-making tradeoffs and serves to promote informed decision making either during the risk assessment stage or the management impact analysis stage. We offer a SWOT analysis (Strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) and put forth a step-by-step user friendly roadmap by which OOBNs may be applied to solve similar “wicked” problems. We identify three primary phases: phases: (1) a priori data generation, (2) model development, and (3) model validation and verification. Our suggested step-by-step framework of OOBN construction and validation is of global relevance; it is designed to model similar “wicked” problems worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin-Fink, Nicole & Reilly, Brian K., 2017. "A road map for developing and applying object-oriented bayesian networks to “WICKED” problems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 27-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:360:y:2017:i:c:p:27-44
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016307955
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guido Vonk & Stan Geertman & Paul Schot, 2007. "A SWOT Analysis of Planning Support Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1699-1714, July.
    2. Cai, Baoping & Liu, Yonghong & Fan, Qian & Zhang, Yunwei & Liu, Zengkai & Yu, Shilin & Ji, Renjie, 2014. "Multi-source information fusion based fault diagnosis of ground-source heat pump using Bayesian network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Kjaerulff, Uffe, 1995. "dHugin: a computational system for dynamic time-sliced Bayesian networks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 89-111, March.
    4. Barton, D.N. & Saloranta, T. & Moe, S.J. & Eggestad, H.O. & Kuikka, S., 2008. "Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management -- Pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 91-104, May.
    5. Chris J Needham & James R Bradford & Andrew J Bulpitt & David R Westhead, 2007. "A Primer on Learning in Bayesian Networks for Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-8, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jumeniyaz Seydehmet & Guang Hui Lv & Ilyas Nurmemet & Tayierjiang Aishan & Abdulla Abliz & Mamat Sawut & Abdugheni Abliz & Mamattursun Eziz, 2018. "Model Prediction of Secondary Soil Salinization in the Keriya Oasis, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Maria Elena De Giuli & Alessandro Greppi & Marina Resta, 2019. "An Object-Oriented Bayesian Framework for the Detection of Market Drivers," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moe, S. Jannicke & Haande, Sigrid & Couture, Raoul-Marie, 2016. "Climate change, cyanobacteria blooms and ecological status of lakes: A Bayesian network approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 330-347.
    2. Michail Tsagris, 2021. "A New Scalable Bayesian Network Learning Algorithm with Applications to Economics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 341-367, January.
    3. Abbas Roozbahani & Ebrahim Ebrahimi & Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, 2018. "A Framework for Ground Water Management Based on Bayesian Network and MCDM Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 4985-5005, December.
    4. McVittie, Alistair & Norton, Lisa & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Siameti, Ioanna & Glenk, Klaus & Aalders, Inge, 2015. "Operationalizing an ecosystem services-based approach using Bayesian Belief Networks: An application to riparian buffer strips," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 15-27.
    5. Liu, Zengkai & Liu, Yonghong & Zhang, Dawei & Cai, Baoping & Zheng, Chao, 2015. "Fault diagnosis for a solar assisted heat pump system under incomplete data and expert knowledge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 41-48.
    6. Garshasbi, Mohammad Sadeq, 2016. "Fault localization based on combines active and passive measurements in computer networks by ant colony optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 205-212.
    7. Bode, Gerrit & Thul, Simon & Baranski, Marc & Müller, Dirk, 2020. "Real-world application of machine-learning-based fault detection trained with experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Chunwang Xiaogeng LiRen & Xiaojun Ma & Fuxiang Chen & Zhicheng Yang & Sandeep Panchal, 2022. "Simulation and inspection of fault arc in building energy-saving distribution system," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 331-339, March.
    9. Wang, Shunke & Chang, Jingjing & Xue, Jie & Sun, Huaiwei & Zeng, Fanjiang & Liu, Lei & Liu, Xin & Li, Xinxin, 2024. "Coupling behavioral economics and water management policies for agricultural land-use planning in basin irrigation districts: Agent-based socio-hydrological modeling and application," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    10. Alessandro Ambrosi & Claudia Cattoglio & Clelia Di Serio, 2008. "Retroviral Integration Process in the Human Genome: Is It Really Non-Random? A New Statistical Approach," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-6, August.
    11. Ksenija Lalović & Jelena Živković & Uroš Radosavljević & Zoran Đukanović, 2019. "An Integral Approach to the Modeling of Information Support for Local Sustainable Development—Experiences of a Serbian Enabling Leadership Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Dellink, Rob & Brouwer, Roy & Linderhof, Vincent & Stone, Karin, 2011. "Bio-economic modeling of water quality improvements using a dynamic applied general equilibrium approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-79.
    13. Corrado Zoppi, 2018. "Integration of Conservation Measures Concerning Natura 2000 Sites into Marine Protected Areas Regulations: A Study Related to Sardinia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Silva, Cecília & Patatas, Tiago & Amante, Ana, 2017. "Evaluating the usefulness of the structural accessibility layer for planning practice – Planning practitioners’ perception," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 137-149.
    15. Moglia, Magnus & Alexander, Kim S. & Thephavanh, Manithaythip & Thammavong, Phomma & Sodahak, Viengkham & Khounsy, Bountom & Vorlasan, Sysavanh & Larson, Silva & Connell, John & Case, Peter, 2018. "A Bayesian network model to explore practice change by smallholder rice farmers in Lao PDR," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 84-94.
    16. Chen, Liwei & Gao, Yansan & Dui, Hongyan & Xing, Liudong, 2021. "Importance measure-based maintenance optimization strategy for pod slewing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Li, Tingting & Zhou, Yangze & Zhao, Yang & Zhang, Chaobo & Zhang, Xuejun, 2022. "A hierarchical object oriented Bayesian network-based fault diagnosis method for building energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    18. J. H. Smid & A. N. Swart & A. H. Havelaar & A. Pielaat, 2011. "A Practical Framework for the Construction of a Biotracing Model: Application to Salmonella in the Pork Slaughter Chain," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(9), pages 1434-1450, September.
    19. Özkan Uğurlu & Serdar Yıldız & Sean Loughney & Jin Wang & Shota Kuntchulia & Irakli Sharabidze, 2020. "Analyzing Collision, Grounding, and Sinking Accidents Occurring in the Black Sea Utilizing HFACS and Bayesian Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2610-2638, December.
    20. Barton, D.N. & Rusch, G. & May, P. & Ring, I. & Unnerstall, H. & Santos, R. & Antunes, P. & Brouwer, R. & Grieg-Gran, M. & Similä, J. & Primmer, E. & Romeiro, A. & DeClerck, F. & Ibrahim, M., 2009. "Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision: a review of some methodological challenges," MPRA Paper 15554, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:360:y:2017:i:c:p:27-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.