IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v312y2015icp77-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling abundance hotspots for data-poor Irish Sea rays

Author

Listed:
  • Dedman, Simon
  • Officer, Rick
  • Brophy, Deirdre
  • Clarke, Maurice
  • Reid, David G.

Abstract

Skates and rays represent one of the most vulnerable components of fish communities in temperate demersal fisheries such as the Irish Sea. They also tend to be data poor in comparison to commercially exploited teleost fish. Spatial management has been suggested as an important tool to protect these species, but requires an understanding of the abundance distribution, and the relationship the abundance distribution has with the environment at both adult and juvenile life history stages. Here we modelled bottom trawl survey data using delta log-normal boosted regression trees to derive rays’ spatial abundance, and environmental links. The modelling approach allowed the development of high resolution predictive maps of abundance of four skate and ray species targeted by fishing activity: thornback, spotted, cuckoo and blonde rays. The distributions of these species were driven by a general preference for sand and coarser substrates as well as higher salinities, temperatures and currents speeds. Spatial comparisons between abundance distributions and locations of skate and ray commercial landings indicated that the main hotspots for the investigated species are outside of the main commercial fishing areas and overlap with potential MPAs proposed for wider ecosystem protection. The method offers a useful tool for selecting potential MPAs to assist the management and conservation of data-poor species.

Suggested Citation

  • Dedman, Simon & Officer, Rick & Brophy, Deirdre & Clarke, Maurice & Reid, David G., 2015. "Modelling abundance hotspots for data-poor Irish Sea rays," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 77-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:312:y:2015:i:c:p:77-90
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015002070
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stelzenmüller, Vanessa & Breen, Patricia & Stamford, Tammy & Thomsen, Frank & Badalamenti, Fabio & Borja, Ángel & Buhl-Mortensen, Lene & Carlstöm, Julia & D’Anna, Giovanni & Dankers, Norbert & Degraer, 2013. "Monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas: A generic framework for implementation of ecosystem based marine management and its application," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 149-164.
    2. Agardy, Tundi & di Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo & Christie, Patrick, 2011. "Mind the gap: Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 226-232, March.
    3. Graham J. Edgar & Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Trevor J. Willis & Stuart Kininmonth & Susan C. Baker & Stuart Banks & Neville S. Barrett & Mikel A. Becerro & Anthony T. F. Bernard & Just Berkhout & Colin D., 2014. "Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 216-220, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dolder, Paul J. & Minto, Cóilín & Guarini, Jean-Marc & Poos, Jan Jaap, 2020. "Highly resolved spatiotemporal simulations for exploring mixed fishery dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    2. Melo-Merino, Sara M. & Reyes-Bonilla, Héctor & Lira-Noriega, Andrés, 2020. "Ecological niche models and species distribution models in marine environments: A literature review and spatial analysis of evidence," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Voyer, Michelle & Gollan, Natalie & Barclay, Kate & Gladstone, William, 2015. "‘It׳s part of me’; understanding the values, images and principles of coastal users and their influence on the social acceptability of MPAs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 93-102.
    2. Jeneen Hadj-Hammou & Joshua E. Cinner & Diego R. Barneche & Iain R. Caldwell & David Mouillot & James P. W. Robinson & Nina M. D. Schiettekatte & Alexandre C. Siqueira & Brett M. Taylor & Nicholas A. , 2024. "Global patterns and drivers of fish reproductive potential on coral reefs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Raphael Seguin & David Mouillot & Joshua E. Cinner & Rick D. Stuart Smith & Eva Maire & Nicholas A. J. Graham & Matthew McLean & Laurent Vigliola & Nicolas Loiseau, 2023. "Towards process-oriented management of tropical reefs in the anthropocene," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 148-157, February.
    4. Carlo Pipitone & Davide Agnetta & Arturo Zenone & Vincenzo Maximiliano Giacalone & Fabio Badalamenti & Fabio Fiorentino & Paola Rinelli & Mauro Sinopoli & Tomás Vega Fernández & Giovanni D’Anna, 2023. "When the Trawl Ban Is a Good Option: Opportunities to Restore Fish Biomass and Size Structure in a Mediterranean Fisheries Restricted Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Portman, Michelle E. & Notarbartolo-di-Sciara, Giuseppe & Agardy, Tundi & Katsanevakis, Stelios & Possingham, Hugh P. & Di-Carlo, Giuseppe, 2013. "He who hesitates is lost: Why conservation in the Mediterranean Sea is necessary and possible now," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 270-279.
    6. Venetia Alexa Hargreaves-Allen & Susana Mourato & Eleanor Jane Milner-Gulland, 2017. "Drivers of coral reef marine protected area performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Bennett, Nathan James & Dearden, Philip, 2014. "From measuring outcomes to providing inputs: Governance, management, and local development for more effective marine protected areas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 96-110.
    8. Merrie, Andrew & Olsson, Per, 2014. "An innovation and agency perspective on the emergence and spread of Marine Spatial Planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 366-374.
    9. Tonin, Stefania, 2018. "Citizens’ perspectives on marine protected areas as a governance strategy to effectively preserve marine ecosystem services and biodiversity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 189-200.
    10. Pécastaing, Nicolas & Salavarriga, Juan, 2022. "The potential impact of fishing in peruvian marine protected areas (MPAs) on artisanal fishery poverty during El Niño events," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. David M Keith & Jessica A Sameoto & Freya M Keyser & Christine A Ward-Paige, 2020. "Evaluating socio-economic and conservation impacts of management: A case study of time-area closures on Georges Bank," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, October.
    12. D. Alieva & D. Holgado & S. Juan & A. Ruiz-Frau & S. Villasante & I. Maya-Jariego, 2022. "Assessing landscape features and ecosystem services of marine protected areas through photographs on social media: comparison of two archipelagos in Spain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9623-9641, July.
    13. Zimmerhackel, Johanna S & Pannell, David J & Meekan, Mark & Kragt, Marit E & Rogers, Abbie, 2016. "Diving Tourism and Fisheries in Marine Protected Areas: Market Values and New Approaches to Improve Compliance in the Maldives Shark Sanctuary," Working Papers 243921, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Rachel Nichols & Satoshi Yamazaki & Sarah Jennings, 2021. "How did a network of marine protected areas impact adjacent fisheries? Evidence from Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(1), pages 119-142, January.
    15. Rojas-Nazar, U.A. & Cullen, R. & Gardner, J.P.A. & Bell, J.J., 2015. "Marine reserve establishment and on-going management costs: A case study from New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 216-224.
    16. Fourriére, Manon & Alvarado, Juan José & Cortés, Jorge & Taylor, Marc H. & Ayala-Bocos, Arturo & Azofeifa-Solano, Juan Carlos & Arauz, Randall & Heidemeyer, Maike & López-Garro, Andrés & Zanella, Ilen, 2019. "Energy flow structure and role of keystone groups in shallow water environments in Isla del Coco, Costa Rica, Eastern Tropical Pacific," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 74-85.
    17. Delord, Karine & Barbraud, Christophe & Bost, Charles-André & Deceuninck, Bernard & Lefebvre, Thierry & Lutz, Rose & Micol, Thierry & Phillips, Richard A. & Trathan, Phil N. & Weimerskirch, Henri, 2014. "Areas of importance for seabirds tracked from French southern territories, and recommendations for conservation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-13.
    18. Watson, G.J. & Murray, J.M. & Schaefer, M. & Bonner, A., 2015. "Successful local marine conservation requires appropriate educational methods and adequate enforcement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 59-67.
    19. Evan Artis & Noella J Gray & Lisa M Campbell & Rebecca L Gruby & Leslie Acton & Sarah Bess Zigler & Lillian Mitchell, 2020. "Stakeholder perspectives on large-scale marine protected areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Nichols, Rachel & Yamazaki, Satoshi & Jennings, Sarah, 2018. "The Role of Precaution in Stock Recovery Plans in a Fishery with Habitat Effect," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 359-369.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:312:y:2015:i:c:p:77-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.