IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i4p982-992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling interactions between scavenger behaviour and farming practices: Impacts on scavenger population and ecosystem service efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Dupont, H.
  • Mihoub, J.B.
  • Becu, N.
  • Sarrazin, F.

Abstract

Long term conservation of ecosystem services requires a deep understanding of their basic processes and the development of tools to assess the effects of human practices on their efficiency. As an example of recycling service, we focus on the consumption of livestock carcasses by obligate scavengers, taking the case of vultures which face a dramatic decline worldwide. We investigate whether maintaining this recycling service through individual feeding stations called light feeding stations in contrast to aggregated resource on heavy feeding stations can meet the double objectives of vulture conservation and service efficiency. We built a spatially explicit multi-agent model to investigate the long term effects of livestock farmers practices on both the recycling service efficiency for farmers and vulture population carrying capacity including: (i) carcass disposal practices that drive the quantity and spatial distribution of resources for vultures and (ii) temporal distribution of livestock mortality due to economic choices that drive the dynamics of resources for vultures. In addition, we examine various scenarios related to vulture feeding behaviour – i.e. central place vs. random foraging and contest vs. scramble intraspecific competition – that may play a role in the vulture carrying capacity and recycling service efficiency. When accounting for vulture central place foraging, we found that favouring the use of light feeding stations instead of heavy feeding station does not affect vulture population carrying capacity and increases the number of farmer for which vulture service is optimal. The increase of light feeding station users poorly affects the number of farmers for which vulture service is optimal in contrast to results obtained with a vulture random foraging behaviour. Both of the recycling service efficiency and the vulture carrying capacity vary with the kind of intraspecific competition and with the seasonal distribution of livestock mortality. Livestock mortality distributions with a seasonal peak of mortality result in a mismatch between vulture food requirement and farmers needs for carcass removal. Finally we raise several points on the relevance of light feeding stations as a sustainable management for vulture conservation and for the recycling service and discuss the potential implications of seasonal scarcity of resources due to farming economic constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Dupont, H. & Mihoub, J.B. & Becu, N. & Sarrazin, F., 2011. "Modelling interactions between scavenger behaviour and farming practices: Impacts on scavenger population and ecosystem service efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 982-992.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:4:p:982-992
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380010006381
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jose L. Tella, 2001. "Action is needed now, or BSE crisis could wipe out endangered birds of prey," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6827), pages 408-408, March.
    2. Arrignon, Florent & Deconchat, Marc & Sarthou, Jean-Pierre & Balent, Gérard & Monteil, Claude, 2007. "Modelling the overwintering strategy of a beneficial insect in a heterogeneous landscape using a multi-agent system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 423-436.
    3. Chloé Deygout & Agnès Gault & Olivier Duriez & François Sarrazin & Carmen Bessa-Gomes, 2010. "Impact of food predictability on social facilitation by foraging scavengers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1131-1139.
    4. Markandya, Anil & Taylor, Tim & Longo, Alberto & Murty, M.N. & Murty, S. & Dhavala, K., 2008. "Counting the cost of vulture decline--An appraisal of the human health and other benefits of vultures in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 194-204, September.
    5. Deygout, C. & Gault, A. & Sarrazin, F. & Bessa-Gomes, C., 2009. "Modeling the impact of feeding stations on vulture scavenging service efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1826-1835.
    6. Sable, Shaye E. & Rose, Kenneth A., 2008. "A comparison of individual-based and matrix projection models for simulating yellow perch population dynamics in Oneida Lake, New York, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 105-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haythorne, Sean & Skabar, Andrew, 2013. "An improved pattern-guided evolution approach for the development of adaptive individual-based ecological models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 72-82.
    2. Plaza, Pablo Ignacio & Lambertucci, Sergio Agustín, 2022. "Mitigating GHG emissions: A global ecosystem service provided by obligate scavenging birds," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Ficker, Harald & Mazzucco, Rupert & Gassner, Hubert & Wanzenböck, Josef & Dieckmann, Ulf, 2016. "Stocking strategies for a pre-alpine whitefish population under temperature stress," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 170-176.
    4. Mintram, Kate S. & Brown, A. Ross & Maynard, Samuel K. & Liu, Chun & Parker, Sarah-Jane & Tyler, Charles R. & Thorbek, Pernille, 2018. "Assessing population impacts of toxicant-induced disruption of breeding behaviours using an individual-based model for the three-spined stickleback," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 107-117.
    5. Radchuk, Viktoriia & Oppel, Steffen & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Grimm, Volker & Schtickzelle, Nicolas, 2016. "Simple or complex: Relative impact of data availability and model purpose on the choice of model types for population viability analyses," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 87-95.
    6. Pahl, Cameron C. & Ruedas, Luis A., 2021. "Carnosaurs as Apex Scavengers: Agent-based simulations reveal possible vulture analogues in late Jurassic Dinosaurs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 458(C).
    7. Vinatier, Fabrice & Tixier, Philippe & Le Page, Christophe & Duyck, Pierre-François & Lescourret, Françoise, 2009. "COSMOS, a spatially explicit model to simulate the epidemiology of Cosmopolites sordidus in banana fields," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(18), pages 2244-2254.
    8. Nicolas Treich, 2021. "Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(1), pages 33-61, May.
    9. Farley, Joshua, 2012. "Ecosystem services: The economics debate," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 40-49.
    10. Grilli, Maricel Graña & Bildstein, Keith L. & Lambertucci, Sergio A., 2019. "Nature’s clean-up crew: Quantifying ecosystem services offered by a migratory avian scavenger on a continental scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    11. Radchuk, Viktoriia & Johst, Karin & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Grimm, Volker & Schtickzelle, Nicolas, 2013. "Behind the scenes of population viability modeling: Predicting butterfly metapopulation dynamics under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 62-73.
    12. Andréa Thiebault & Ralf H.E. Mullers & Pierre A. Pistorius & Yann Tremblay, 2014. "Editor's choice Local enhancement in a seabird: reaction distances and foraging consequence of predator aggregations," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1302-1310.
    13. Cody S. Clements & Zoe A. Pratte & Frank J. Stewart & Mark E. Hay, 2024. "Removal of detritivore sea cucumbers from reefs increases coral disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. García-Jiménez, Ruth & Morales-Reyes, Zebensui & Pérez-García, Juan M. & Margalida, Antoni, 2021. "Economic valuation of non-material contributions to people provided by avian scavengers: Harmonizing conservation and wildlife-based tourism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Daniel Oro & Antoni Margalida & Martina Carrete & Rafael Heredia & José Antonio Donázar, 2008. "Testing the Goodness of Supplementary Feeding to Enhance Population Viability in an Endangered Vulture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Deygout, C. & Gault, A. & Sarrazin, F. & Bessa-Gomes, C., 2009. "Modeling the impact of feeding stations on vulture scavenging service efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1826-1835.
    17. Liukkonen, Lauri & Ayllón, Daniel & Kunnasranta, Mervi & Niemi, Marja & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Grimm, Volker & Nyman, Anna-Maija, 2018. "Modelling movements of Saimaa ringed seals using an individual-based approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 321-335.
    18. Eyal Frank & Anant Sudarshan, 2024. "The Social Costs of Keystone Species Collapse: Evidence from the Decline of Vultures in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(10), pages 3007-3040, October.
    19. Collard, B. & Tixier, P. & Carval, D. & Lavigne, C. & Delattre, T., 2018. "Spatial organisation of habitats in agricultural plots affects per-capita predator effect on conservation biological control: An individual based modelling study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 124-135.
    20. Gupta, Urvi & Qureshi, Qamar & Kumar, Nishant, 2020. "Folk perceptions for avian scavengers in a tropical megacity: implications for biocultural conservation," SocArXiv tmdv4, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:4:p:982-992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.