IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i18p3403-3412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of grain size on species–habitat models

Author

Listed:
  • Gottschalk, Thomas K.
  • Aue, Birgit
  • Hotes, Stefan
  • Ekschmitt, Klemens

Abstract

High resolution remote sensing data facilitate the use of small-scale habitat features such as trees or hedges in the analysis of species–habitat relationships. Such data potentially enable more accurate species–habitat mapping than lower resolution data. Here, for the first time, we systematically investigated this hypothesis by altering the spatial resolution from 1m up to 1000m grain size in species–habitat models of 13 bird species. The study area covered the Nidda river catchment in central Germany, a large heterogeneous landscape of 1620km2. A high resolution habitat map of the area was converted to coarser spatial and thematic resolutions in seven steps. We investigated how model performance responded to grain size, and we compared the differential effects of spatial resolution and thematic resolution on model performance. Explained deviance (D2) of the bird models generally decreased with coarser spatial resolution of the data, although it did not decrease monotonically in all species. On average across all species, model D2 decreased from 41.5 at 1m grain size to 15.9 at 1000m grain size. Ten species were best modelled at 1m, two species at 3m and one species at 32m grain size. Model performance degraded continuously with increasing grain size, both in habitat generalist and habitat specialist bird species, and was systematically lower in habitat generalists. The higher model performance observed at finer grain sizes was most likely caused by the combination of three factors: (1) high spatial accuracy of bird records and (2) a more precise location and delineation of habitat features and, (3) to a lesser degree, by more habitat types differentiated in maps of finer resolution. We conclude that higher spatial and thematic resolution data can be essential for deriving accurate predictions on bird distribution patterns from species–habitat models. Especially for bird species that are sensitive to specific land-use types or to small-scaled habitat features, a grain size of 1–3m seems most promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Gottschalk, Thomas K. & Aue, Birgit & Hotes, Stefan & Ekschmitt, Klemens, 2011. "Influence of grain size on species–habitat models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(18), pages 3403-3412.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:18:p:3403-3412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011003784
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van Eupen, Camille & Maes, Dirk & Herremans, Marc & Swinnen, Kristijn R.R. & Somers, Ben & Luca, Stijn, 2021. "The impact of data quality filtering of opportunistic citizen science data on species distribution model performance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 444(C).
    2. Syed Amir Manzoor & Aisha Malik & Muhammad Zubair & Geoffrey Griffiths & Martin Lukac, 2019. "Linking Social Perception and Provision of Ecosystem Services in a Sprawling Urban Landscape: A Case Study of Multan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Song, Wonkyong & Kim, Eunyoung & Lee, Dongkun & Lee, Moungjin & Jeon, Seong-Woo, 2013. "The sensitivity of species distribution modeling to scale differences," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 113-118.
    4. Abdulwahab, Umarfarooq A. & Hammill, Edd & Hawkins, Charles P., 2022. "Choice of climate data affects the performance and interpretation of species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:18:p:3403-3412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.