IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i15p2642-2650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating dyad association probability under imperfect and heterogeneous detection

Author

Listed:
  • Klaich, M. Javier
  • Kinas, Paul G.
  • Pedraza, Susana N.
  • Coscarella, Mariano A.
  • Crespo, Enrique A.

Abstract

In animal behaviour studies, association indices estimate the proportion of time two individuals (i.e. a dyad) spend in association. In terms of dyads, all association indices can be interpreted as estimators of the probability that a dyad is associated. However, traditional indices rely on the assumptions that the probability to detect a particular individual (p) is either approximately one and/or homogeneous between associated and not associated individuals. Based on marked individuals we develop a likelihood based model to estimate the probability a dyad is associated (ψ) accounting for p<1 and possibly varying between associated and not associated individuals. The proposed likelihood based model allows for both individual and dyadic missing observations. In addition, the model can easily be extended to incorporate covariate information for modeling p and ψ. A simulation study showed that the likelihood based model approach yield reasonably unbiased estimates, even for low and heterogeneous individual detection probabilities, while, in contrast, traditional indices showed moderate to strong biases. The application of the proposed approach is illustrated using a real data set collected from a population of Commerson's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus commersonii) in Patagonia Argentina. Finally, we discuss possible extensions of the proposed model and its applicability in animal behaviour and ecological studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaich, M. Javier & Kinas, Paul G. & Pedraza, Susana N. & Coscarella, Mariano A. & Crespo, Enrique A., 2011. "Estimating dyad association probability under imperfect and heterogeneous detection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2642-2650.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:15:p:2642-2650
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.03.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011001645
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.03.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Chao & Robin L. Chazdon & Robert K. Colwell & Tsung-Jen Shen, 2006. "Abundance-Based Similarity Indices and Their Estimation When There Are Unseen Species in Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 361-371, June.
    2. William A. Link, 2003. "Nonidentifiability of Population Size from Capture-Recapture Data with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1123-1130, December.
    3. László Zsolt Garamszegi & Sara Calhim & Ned Dochtermann & Gergely Hegyi & Peter L. Hurd & Christian Jørgensen & Nobuyuki Kutsukake & Marc J. Lajeunesse & Kimberly A. Pollard & Holger Schielzeth & Matt, 2009. "Changing philosophies and tools for statistical inferences in behavioral ecology," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1363-1375.
    4. Shirley Pledger, 2000. "Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 434-442, June.
    5. Corkrey, Ross & Brooks, Steve & Lusseau, David & Parsons, Kim & Durban, John W & Hammond, Philip S & Thompson, Paul M, 2008. "A Bayesian Capture–Recapture Population Model With Simultaneous Estimation of Heterogeneity," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 948-960.
    6. Roger Pradel, 2005. "Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 442-447, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gimenez, Olivier & Mansilla, Lorena & Klaich, M. Javier & Coscarella, Mariano A. & Pedraza, Susana N. & Crespo, Enrique A., 2019. "Inferring animal social networks with imperfect detection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 69-74.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah Worthington & Rachel S. McCrea & Ruth King & Richard A. Griffiths, 2019. "Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probability Depends on Individual States," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 154-172, March.
    2. Paul S. F. Yip & Hua-Zhen Lin & Liqun Xi, 2005. "A Semiparametric Method for Estimating Population Size for Capture–Recapture Experiments with Random Covariates in Continuous Time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1085-1092, December.
    3. Chang Xuan Mao & Na You, 2009. "On Comparison of Mixture Models for Closed Population Capture–Recapture Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 547-553, June.
    4. Hajo Holzmann & Axel Munk & Walter Zucchini, 2006. "On Identifiability in Capture–Recapture Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 934-936, September.
    5. Louis-Paul Rivest & Sophie Baillargeon, 2007. "Applications and Extensions of Chao's Moment Estimator for the Size of a Closed Population," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 999-1006, December.
    6. J. Andrew Royle, 2006. "Site Occupancy Models with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 97-102, March.
    7. B. J. T. Morgan & M. S. Ridout, 2008. "A new mixture model for capture heterogeneity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(4), pages 433-446, September.
    8. Riki Herliansyah & Ruth King & Stuart King, 2022. "Laplace Approximations for Capture–Recapture Models in the Presence of Individual Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 401-418, September.
    9. Jakub Stoklosa & Wen-Han Hwang & Sheng-Hai Wu & Richard Huggins, 2011. "Heterogeneous Capture–Recapture Models with Covariates: A Partial Likelihood Approach for Closed Populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1659-1665, December.
    10. Fodé Tounkara & Louis‐Paul Rivest, 2015. "Mixture regression models for closed population capture–recapture data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 721-730, September.
    11. Richard Arnold & Yu Hayakawa & Paul Yip, 2010. "Capture–Recapture Estimation Using Finite Mixtures of Arbitrary Dimension," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 644-655, June.
    12. Chang Xuan Mao & Robert K. Colwell & Jing Chang, 2005. "Estimating the Species Accumulation Curve Using Mixtures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 433-441, June.
    13. Dankmar Böhning, 2010. "Some General Comparative Points on Chao's and Zelterman's Estimators of the Population Size," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 221-236, June.
    14. Robert M. Dorazio & J. Andrew Royle, 2005. "Rejoinder to "The Performance of Mixture Models in Heterogeneous Closed Population Capture-Recapture"," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 874-876, September.
    15. Chang Xuan Mao & Jun Li, 2009. "Comparing Species Assemblages Via Species Accumulation Curves," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1063-1067, December.
    16. Shirley Pledger & Kenneth H. Pollock & James L. Norris, 2010. "Open Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: II. Jolly–Seber Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 883-890, September.
    17. Shirley Pledger & Edward Baker & Kim Scribner, 2013. "Breeding Return Times and Abundance in Capture–Recapture Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 991-1001, December.
    18. Shirley Pledger, 2005. "The Performance of Mixture Models in Heterogeneous Closed Population Capture–Recapture," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 868-873, September.
    19. R. King & S. P. Brooks, 2008. "On the Bayesian Estimation of a Closed Population Size in the Presence of Heterogeneity and Model Uncertainty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 816-824, September.
    20. Dankmar Böhning & Ronny Kuhnert, 2006. "Equivalence of Truncated Count Mixture Distributions and Mixtures of Truncated Count Distributions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1207-1215, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:15:p:2642-2650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.